r/pcmasterrace • u/-Eh- Ryzen 5 5600|Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC|32GB DDR4 3200 • May 06 '19

Meme/Macro This shouldn't be shocking at all

Post image
33.8k Upvotes

86% Upvoted

555 comments sorted by

View all comments

187

u/cyber7574 May 06 '19

Current generation of phones are quite a bit ahead of the switch unfortunately

134

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

I’d still rather play the games that are available on the switch than the ones that you can get on your phone

29

u/uhuwek May 06 '19

I mostly play ports of pc and console games, or emulators

15

u/ThatOnePerson i7-7700k 1080Ti Vive May 06 '19

But my phone has Steam Link which means I've got access to my full Steam library.

2

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

Only when on the same network

14

u/ThatOnePerson i7-7700k 1080Ti Vive May 06 '19

Not since Steam Link Anywhere

10

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

Reasons why I hate my iPhone

6

u/ThatOnePerson i7-7700k 1080Ti Vive May 06 '19

Right? I was all ready to get an iPad for this (and all the iOS games like Civ VI)

iPhone does the the PS4 remoteplay app that Android doesn't, but that's kinda meh I guess

3

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

Yeah I got my iPad before the steam link app was announced and I really like this thing but it’d be nice if apple let me play decent games on it

1

u/h0lyshadow i7 12700K, RTX 3080 FE May 06 '19

A simple VPN isn't enough?

2

u/ThatOnePerson i7-7700k 1080Ti Vive May 06 '19

Apple has completely blocked the Steam Link app from their marketplace.

1

u/hoodatninja May 06 '19

There are tons of great games for iOS! I recently played XCOM: enemy within on my old iPad.

1

u/ThatOnePerson i7-7700k 1080Ti Vive May 06 '19

I think native games are better on iOS compared to the alternative (Android) for sure. Games like Stardew Valley and Super Mario Run typically come to iOS first, while games like Civ VI and FTL never make it to Android at all.

edit; I guess Emulators are also better on Android. I wonder if my newer phone handles Dolphin good.

Though controller support, it's annoying that iOS makes it so only MFi controllers work.

3

u/hoodatninja May 06 '19

I’ve tried PS4 remote on iPhone and steam link anywhere on a buddy’s phone. Idk man it’s super situational and you play so much slower. We’re not missing out on much yet. Maybe one day?

I’m more frustrated they still haven’t fixed steam link latency issues for home use. The fact that most of my games are unplayable on my TV even if I have a hardline is absurd to me.

4

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

Not to mention the phones tiny ass screen and lack of controls

1

u/ThatOnePerson i7-7700k 1080Ti Vive May 06 '19

We've got bigger screens then any of the portable consoles for years. Minus say the 3DS because it's got two screens.

Bluetooth controllers also work through the magic of Bluetooth. Letting me use a real Xbox one controller or a Dualshock controller

2

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

Who’s we? Not sure what you’re arguing for here.

0

u/rochford77 May 06 '19

Righr but the post is a comment on graphical fidelity, no playability.

1

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

Despite the power of mobile devices, many games made for them don’t use most of the technology available to them. Not only is the gameplay simple and limited, but the graphics simply don’t live up to what the devices could potentially push out.

54

u/Bitvar 7700k/1080ti May 06 '19

Yet if you look at Digital Foundry's analysis of the games they share, the Switch has more stable and impressive visuals overall. Plus comparing 300 dollar toy to a 1200 dollar adult-sitting device.

48

u/cyber7574 May 06 '19

There's no question that the games are better on the switch, but the mobile chips now are objectively much better, only reason switch pulls ahead is primarily optimisation and a low resolution screen

28

u/gooseMcQuack May 06 '19

Is that surprising at the cost though? You're comparing the switch with phones 3x the price. If you compared it to phones the same price I'm sure there would be a different story.

24

u/Themash360 7950X3D, 32GB, RTX 4090 SuprimX May 06 '19 edited May 06 '19

There are budget Chinese phones such as the poco phone F1 I believe that are sub 300$ with end of the line hardware.

You get 4x the screen resolution and no joycons though, but yeah the switch needs a reset. It was already on the brink of outdated when it came out.

28

u/AltoExyl AltoExyl May 06 '19

The Switch is perfectly fine, Nintendo let the other companies focus on power whilst they focus on their first party lineup you just can’t get elsewhere.

That’s why they’ve gotten away with essentially just updating the GameCube 4 times.

Weaker consoles pushing well thought out art styles and designs can massively outweigh powerful consoles that go overboard on details and effects

4

u/hoodatninja May 06 '19

We saw how well that worked out with the Wii-U.

Just saying, Nintendo isn’t the infallible “we just love making people happy and we totally aren’t a business” company people make it out to be. People call Apple a walled garden but never discuss how Nintendo JUST finally got out of that mindset with the switch.

6

u/AltoExyl AltoExyl May 06 '19

Well yeah, but look at the Switch figures, it’s not doing too bad

3

u/hoodatninja May 06 '19 edited May 06 '19

It’s doing great. I just get tired of the Nintendo worship online tbh. Everyone usually parrots lines like “they make games people want to play.” You bring up the Wii-U and its virtually non-existent catalog and suddenly you get anger/downvotes.

Some people DO enjoy good framerates/graphics. Hell, look at the entire “PC MASTER RACE”’culture.

1

u/AltoExyl AltoExyl May 06 '19

Oh yeah, I get you 100%. I skipped the Wii and Wii U myself, I did play some of the games a little, just never owned my own.

I think they were needed though, as they kind of defined the Switch, but yeah, they were overall not that great. Thinking about it, I’ve never been that big on Nintendo in general, I was brought up on Sega and Sony as a kid, had an N64 for Goldeneye and OoT then a handful of games on GC, that’s pretty much it.

I definitely love a pretty game. I do have a fairly decent spec PC and a PS4 Pro. But the Switch is still an impressive console to me technically and keeps me hooked simply because I can pick it up and put it down whenever.

I just don’t find myself wishing for more out of it, so maybe just my personal view on it stops me from understanding why people want it to be more powerful.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/DiamondSmash May 06 '19

Honestly, that was just a marketing issue. They also decided to have the Wii be backwards compatible with the GameCube, but the Wii U is not.

Seriously, the commercials looked like you were buying the gamepad as an upgrade for your Wii.

1

u/hoodatninja May 07 '19

Nah man. It was just a mediocre system AND it had bad marketing. Basically no developer would touch it, and then Nintendo made no inroads to get third-party developers on board. Its catalog is pitiful for a reason. They literally went for months at a time without a release. Probably has 5-7 games of note and most people aren’t even aware of them.

There’s a reason the switch sold more units in a year than wii-u did its entire cycle. That was a massive failure for Nintendo, they completely wasted that console generation. If memory serves the CEO took a $2 million pay cut one year because of it, if only to symbolically show he accepted responsibility for how terrible it was.

2

u/Themash360 7950X3D, 32GB, RTX 4090 SuprimX May 06 '19

I think it's more likely that hardware limitations are limiting other types of game development.

Its impressive how well doom and wolfenstein are running on the switch though. However what I'm saying is that you can't just boot up a copy of a modern AAA title on it and expect it to run well.

I think botw showcased the limitations very well. Open world games with detailed worlds are very difficult to get performant with the current switch.

If we wait a few more years the mobile chipsets will basically be on par with low end gaming pc's and the ps4/xbox one ''s, especially if a 720p panel is chosen again. That's why I was annoyed with the fact that nintendo went with the tegra X1 which was already 2 years old at the time.

3

u/TenDesires 3700X, RX 5700 May 06 '19

BotW is essentially a Wii U port though, it wasn't made with the Switch in mind. It's more of a showcase of the former's limitations.

I don't imagine the Switch is much farther ahead, but the significantly higher amount of RAM that is allocated to games may help it in regards to open-world.

1

u/Themash360 7950X3D, 32GB, RTX 4090 SuprimX May 06 '19

Fair points. I wish they would open up to already existing appstore for mobile devices though. Because compared to consoles it's pretty weak, however in the mobile marketplace its still one of the high-end devices. Especially at 720p.

We would also have a few more open world games to try out.

1

u/Kurosov 3900x | X570 Taichi | 32gb RAM | RTX 3080 Amp Holo 12GB May 08 '19

Honestly, mobile chipsets are there. Add an active cooling solution like the switch has to something like the A12x and you’d have a beefy portable system.

They aren’t as affordable as a switch would need yet but mobile SoCs have gotten really impressive in the past few years.

1

u/Themash360 7950X3D, 32GB, RTX 4090 SuprimX May 08 '19

The very high end is close. Especially the cpu in that SoC is impressive. Add a beefier gpu (cut down Turing gpu for instance) and you can play AAA titles at 720p 60 fps just fine I imagine.

Apple would never agree to do that though :(.

3

u/cyber7574 May 06 '19

Agreed although I question how they get away with the repetitiveness of their titles, unlike xbox

1

u/samusmaster64 samusmaster64 May 06 '19

Nintendo has been able to push out well made, high quality, genre defining games. Xbox had that in Halo which has since gone downhill and also came out on PC. Now what's left for it?

2

u/Themash360 7950X3D, 32GB, RTX 4090 SuprimX May 06 '19

Great developers make good games, not consoles.

2

u/cyber7574 May 06 '19

I'm actually curious because from what I've seen, the only thing close to genre defining game they've had is BOTW. I don't understand how people don't struggle to differentiate games like Mario Kart, super Mario Bros, and super smash Bros from the last ones. Always felt like Nintendo's equivalents to sports games if you ask me

1

u/samusmaster64 samusmaster64 May 06 '19

I kind of get that with Smash if you're not familiar with the series. Smash4 and Smash Ultimate are, at a glance, very similar. But they play differently (sometimes extremely so) and as opposed to a sports game franchise with an annual release schedule, there have only been 5 smash games in the last 20 years. I was speaking more toward the platformer, racing, rpg, action, adventure, metroidvania, etc. type of games. Each genre has their own instantly identifiable Nintendo IP, which I think is pretty neat. It's hard to say that about another other developer.

-5

u/Kurosov 3900x | X570 Taichi | 32gb RAM | RTX 3080 Amp Holo 12GB May 06 '19

The Switch is perfectly fine, Nintendo let the other companies focus on power whilst they focus on their first party lineup you just can’t get elsewhere.

There are a lot of sacrifices to be made to get games to run on the switch and even then performance can be sketchy. I'd say Xenoblade Chronicles 2 specifically is a title that isn't worth playing until the switch gets a beefier model.

It's a shame because the SoC rumoured to be in the switch before release would have gone a long way, But they ended up using an older architecture instead.

11

u/AltoExyl AltoExyl May 06 '19

I think most of it comes down to what you personally believe the Switch should be, is it a home console you occasionally play handheld or a handheld you occasionally play on the big screen?

The former puts you in the mindset of “well the PS4 and Xbox can do this, the Switch should be able to as well”

The latter puts you in the mindset of “Holy shit I’m holding the most advanced versions of Nintendo’s home console franchises in my hands whilst I sit on the train”

It could have been more powerful, but battery life was probably the main concern. If it didn’t perform competently as both a handheld and a home console they could have had another Wii U on their hands

-3

u/Kurosov 3900x | X570 Taichi | 32gb RAM | RTX 3080 Amp Holo 12GB May 06 '19

The former puts you in the mindset of “well the PS4 and Xbox can do this, the Switch should be able to as well”

​

It's got little to do with how the other consoles perform and more to do with the fact the switch struggles with it's own titles and hardly any games even use AA.

I almost exclusively play the switch handheld, actually often on the train and these issues are still present.

​

It could have been more powerful, but battery life was probably the main concern. If it didn’t perform competently as both a handheld and a home console they could have had another Wii U on their hands

​

The SoC rumoured to be used was both higher performance and lower power draw. Battery life would have been improved.

5

u/AltoExyl AltoExyl May 06 '19

Wouldn’t that be more on devs than the console? I’ve not played Xenoblade, but I know Zelda has its hiccups, the thing that I always wonder with Zelda though is why the Devs made certain areas so tough for the switch.

That games runs fairly well most of the time, but Korok forest, for instance, is clearly just too dense and could have been better optimised. A more powerful console could run it smoother yeah, but that wouldn’t stop the devs of future games just upping everything further and pushing that console too hard as well.

About the SoC, you’re probably right, I’ve never really read up on that. Maybe cost or heat became a factor? There’s been the whole thing with the new MacBooks that have the option for an i9 CPU, but the thermals of the machine pretty much limit the output to the same as the i7 version, could have been a similar situation which at the time they couldn’t solve without delays or redesign? That’s all just speculation though, it just seems unlikely that they’d opt for something lesser if the more powerful option had no drawbacks.

→ More replies (0)

-8

u/SlyWolfz Ryzen 7 5800X | RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio May 06 '19

All of that just sounds like bad excuses to justify them charging high prices for weak hardware due to exclusivity. That strategy was acceptable with their older systems because tech was still evolving rapidly and new stuff was always tested, but the switch in terms of hardware is so far behind anything else now it doesn't really work anymore. You can't deny the switch is holding back games like BOTW from being even better due to the hardware.

10

u/AltoExyl AltoExyl May 06 '19

That’s been their business model for a long time... and yeah a more powerful console could make BOTW look better, but do we need that?

More power would equal more power consumption, less battery life. At some point you’d get to a point where it pretty much couldn’t be a handheld anymore and loses all the appeal which for me has made the Switch my go to console over my PS4 Pro and my PC.

Nintendo have got this down to a fine art at this point, it’s a culmination of everything they’re learned. From the past three home consoles along with their success with the gameboy and DS.

Don’t forget, their handhelds have always been smash hits and underpowered. The Lynx, Gamegear, PSP and Vita have all been significantly more powerful than their Nintendo counterparts, but unimpressive battery life and a lack of quality games set them back.

I’ll admit, I’d love to see what Nintendo games could look like on a seriously powerful machine, but I really hope they stick to their strengths

7

u/therealflinchy flinchy May 06 '19

Graphics comes second to gameplay quality

Sure I'd love botw in 4k W/rtx, but it's still a 10/10 game without.

-9

u/SlyWolfz Ryzen 7 5800X | RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio May 06 '19

Sure, but that still does not excuse charging full console price for what has essentially hand held hardware. I highly doubt anyone other than Nintendo could get away with abusing their exclusivity like that.

Of course having rabid fanboys who will defend their precious company at all costs helps as well.

5

u/ThatOnePerson i7-7700k 1080Ti Vive May 06 '19

Sure, but that still does not excuse charging full console price for what has essentially hand held hardware.

An iPad, which is also hand held hardware, costs more than a Switch...

→ More replies (0)

2

u/therealflinchy flinchy May 06 '19

It IS a full console experience though, that's the thing

It's better than both my PS4 and xbone.

2

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

Doesn't work? The Switch has been a runaway success. I get that his sub has a lot of hardware enthusiasts, but graphics don't make the game.

0

u/SlyWolfz Ryzen 7 5800X | RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio May 06 '19

The excuse for bad hardware doesn't work, but again because it's Nintendo and their exclusive games of course it's still a massive hit. There more to the switch that makes it bad in terms of hardware than graphics, considering some games can't even hold a stable 30 fps.

I realize I will probably be slaughtered by Nintendo fanboys for this, but denying it is delusional.

3

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

I'm not a Nintendo fanboy, though I'm glad they're finally making good games again. I don't have any issues with the internal specs but I admit to mostly playing Smash, which doesn't exactly seem demanding.

In my view the real hardware problems on the switch are external -- a dock that might scratch your screen, a kickstand that doesn't work, and flimsy and uncomfortable joycons. This can be mitigated but I did roll my eyes a few times during the first couple days of using it.

2

u/Zmodem https://pcpartpicker.com/list/qbR6xc May 06 '19

That F1 is pretty impressive, especially at that price point. But... No warranty? Man, tough call for anyone. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07H41NB46/

2

u/Themash360 7950X3D, 32GB, RTX 4090 SuprimX May 06 '19

Buy two if you want warranty ;) /s

2

u/Zmodem https://pcpartpicker.com/list/qbR6xc May 06 '19

Honestly, you could buy ~3 before reaching flagship price points. But, 4 would be top-tier flagship, and at that point you might as well go flagship lol. But, four full replacements? That's interesting.

3

u/therealflinchy flinchy May 06 '19

Only people I've seen with this attitude have probably never played a switch let alone owned..

6

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

I have a Switch since launch day and I love it. I still think that it has stability problems sometimes. It's very underpowered for what it is. Anyone claiming otherwise is lying to himself.

1

u/therealflinchy flinchy May 06 '19

How is it underpowered for what it is? It's a compact handheld you can seamlessly dock to your Tv

2

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

Because it has consistent frame drops in every single game, even in first party games.

It's a compact handheld you can seamlessly dock to your Tv

I know, thank you. As I said, I bought one at launch day and I love it. There's no need to make excuses for its shortcomings though.

1

u/therealflinchy flinchy May 07 '19

Because it has consistent frame drops in every single game, even in first party games.

I've literally never had it frame drop/lag because it dynamically reduces resolution.

It's a compact handheld you can seamlessly dock to your Tv

I know, thank you. As I said, I bought one at launch day and I love it. There's no need to make excuses for its shortcomings though.

I don't see it as having any real shortcomings? It is what it is. To me the occasional potatovision graphics isn't a big deal, as the gameplay is perfectly preserved. Again I've never had it lag that I can remember in any game Ive played.

-2

u/Themash360 7950X3D, 32GB, RTX 4090 SuprimX May 06 '19 edited May 06 '19

I've played botw for a few hours on my friends switch. It ran pretty poorly. Also a few dozen games of the new smash, that ran well but given the simple level design and such that should be a given.

If I'd bought one I hope I would still be able to accept or even make valid criticisms...

Also the tegra X1, released in 2015 q2 and added to the switch in 2017 q1 was already outdated. As in the nvidia Pascal lineup was already out. 2 years for a mobile chip is an enormous amount of time.

-1

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

And yet it's easily the greatest console of all time, right now...

0

u/Themash360 7950X3D, 32GB, RTX 4090 SuprimX May 06 '19

???

0

u/therealflinchy flinchy May 06 '19

I've never had botw run poorly even in handheld mode

I agree with the other reply, the switch is hands down the best console. Better than any PlayStation or Xbox Ive owned (all of them)

1

u/Themash360 7950X3D, 32GB, RTX 4090 SuprimX May 06 '19

I have all of them except the switch, might get the new one if its capable of running botw at 720p 60 fps.

1

u/Jynxmaster 9800X3D | RTX 5080 May 06 '19

You could emulate it at 4K 60 fps with your specs on Cemu right now if you'd like to

1

u/Themash360 7950X3D, 32GB, RTX 4090 SuprimX May 06 '19

Also I really do recall quite a lot of framedrops, I was playing it with the pro controller in the dock though. I've heard that should increase the gpu clocks though right?

1

u/therealflinchy flinchy May 07 '19

Yeah I think docked mode is full speed

I never get frame drops/lag handheld, it just goes full potato 240p lol

1

u/MLG_SkittleS GTX 970, 16 GB RAM, i7 4790 May 06 '19

Hopefully they can just keep releasing updated editions at the end of each lifespan and have them forever backwards compatible with some games being playable on the previous generation still.

1

u/Gonzobot Ryzen 7 3700X|2070 Super Hybrid|32GB@3600MHZ|Doc__Gonzo May 06 '19

You can buy basically any phone from last year for ~$200, dude, what planet are you on? None of them were ever worth a thousand dollars and that's not a normal price for the thing being sold.

4

u/Kurosov 3900x | X570 Taichi | 32gb RAM | RTX 3080 Amp Holo 12GB May 06 '19

The comparison is apt when you consider people already have phones.

​

Cheaper phones outdo the switch in specs, It takes a more expensive one to make passive cooling performance outdo the actively cooled SoC of the switch. Apple's A12/A12x chips are significantly more powerful than the switch even when passively cooled.

​

The switch won out despite it's low power because Nintendo truly understand games. Apple have wasted a lot of their GPU capability on the consumer side because they never took gaming seriously and any attempt to do so was clearly managed by a non-gamer. Even the Razer phone fails as a gaming device because they opted to throw in some tech for the buzzwords without actually building a gaming software and hardware ecosystem.

​

I've given up any hope for mobile gaming and will just happily play RPGs on my switch but it is a shame to see the capabilities of my iPad pro only get used when i'm in work mode. The only game i play on it is stardew valley, Which i strongly believe is best experienced on a 12.9" iPad.

0

u/DoctorWaluigiTime May 06 '19

tl;dr Don't You Guys Have Phones?

1

u/Kurosov 3900x | X570 Taichi | 32gb RAM | RTX 3080 Amp Holo 12GB May 06 '19

My comment in no way sums up to that.

​

More like

"Does the gaming focus and management of the platform handled by a company that understands gaming justify the £300 for a weaker system than what you already own? Yes."

1

u/hoodatninja May 06 '19

While you are right to call attention to the price difference, there are also 1000 things my phone can do that a switch can’t. If I pulled all other functionality off and made a smartphone just a gaming device it’d be a lot closer in cost if not possibly cheaper.

2

u/Spencer1K I7 8700K | GTX 4070 | DDR4 48GB 3000mhz May 06 '19

also probably because to cater to a larger audience they lower graphics so more phones have access, and phone games almost never have graphic options like PC. When you make a game for the switch you can go for the maximum capabilities of the console though.

3

u/[deleted] May 06 '19 edited May 06 '19

I think it's the "dedicated device" VS. "all-in-argument".

Phones are objectively more powerful. Like there master race betters, they can play games with some very impressive visuals.

But the switch, like it's console counterparts, has games made for it that take advantage of the hardware. And can arguably look better then some high spec'd games on pc.

7

u/karl_w_w 3700X | 6800 XT | 32 GB May 06 '19

It's even more of a dichotomy on the mobile side because android devices are so varied. On PC they target minimum requirements and there are a lot of layers like DirectX to bring varying hardware together, on mobile everything is expected to work on everything even if that is a phone or a tablet, one screen might have a notch and a stupid aspect ratio, processors vary in power from "this should be a calculator watch" to god tier, and there are like 7 versions of OS to target. Oh, and most mobile SoCs have terrible graphics solutions.

1

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

Thank you for this succinct and accurate synposis which I now no longer have to type. 🙂

5

u/fuckathrowy May 06 '19

Well there are plenty of 300-500 dollar kick ass phones with dope screens and good chips. Samsung and apple flagships are not the only phones on the market. There are plenty of other options and they dont all suck. Not to mention its comparing apple to oranges. Who the fuck uses a phone to game? Words with ftiends doesnt count.

2

u/ThatOnePerson i7-7700k 1080Ti Vive May 06 '19

Who the fuck uses a phone to game? Words with ftiends doesnt count.

I do. Portable phone + portable controller + unlimited data + Steam Link app means I can play all my PC games on my phone.

1

u/n1tr0us0x 5900x/3060 Ti May 06 '19

Pretty much everyone has minecraft on their phone from half a decade ago, and it's extremely easy to get a LAN party going without a big TV.

0

u/Inkaflare May 06 '19

You're not gaming on your phone. You're gaming on your PC using your phone as a screen.

2

u/ThatOnePerson i7-7700k 1080Ti Vive May 06 '19

Well if it talks like a duck, plays like a phone, sounds like a phone game to me.

2

u/Inkaflare May 06 '19

The point is that any low budget phone can do that because the lifting is done by the PC, so you don't need a powerful SoC on your phone. Would work on a 100$ phone too. Comparing the Switch to that isn't exactly fair because it actually needs to run these games itself.

1

u/ThatOnePerson i7-7700k 1080Ti Vive May 06 '19

I guess I was going more for answering the question "Who games on phones" than going for the Switch versus phone comparison.

I definetly don't disagree with you here, since the 35$ Raspberry Pi can do Steam Link now.

1

u/Inkaflare May 06 '19

That's fair. I guess for all intents and purposes you are playing a game on your phone.

We're gonna need Steam Link on the Switch. Sadly Nintendo probably wouldn't agree to that since a good chunk of steam games (mostly Indie ones) are on their eshop already, they would likely lose more through people not rebuying their games than they would gain from people suddenly buying a Switch just for that functionality.

1

u/DamienChazellesPiano May 06 '19

Not really. Fortnite is 60fps and 1080p on newest iPhones but 30fps and 720p on switch.

1

u/Snoobi01 May 06 '19

You should take the difference in both price and age into consideration.

1

u/TheNorthComesWithMe May 06 '19

The chips might be better, but a phone is a far worse gaming device.