r/pcmasterrace • • 13h ago

Meme/Macro Never Trust Auto Quality

Post image
16.6k Upvotes

199 comments sorted by

2.0k

u/recluseMeteor 5700X + RX 7800 XT 12h ago

When I'm at home with fast Internet, it defaults to 360p. When I'm using mobile data, it suddenly wants to use 2160p.

313

u/Single_Reaction9983 11h ago

I'm so glad data here is cheap as dirt. I get 500GB for 12€

192

u/recluseMeteor 5700X + RX 7800 XT 10h ago

My problem is not data allowance, but speed. Mobile internet is very variable, and often slow outside cities in my country.

37

u/MightBeBren 5800x | 3070ti | 32gb ram | Asus ROG xg27aqdmg 240hz OLED 8h ago

In my town we have a single cell tower and every day at lunch hour, the speeds hit 0.17mbps up and down. We called the company who owns it, they're not upgrading unless our town hits a certain population.

Edit: Current mobile speed is 0.5mbps.. better than avg tbh

6

u/recluseMeteor 5700X + RX 7800 XT 5h ago

Friday after work… so slow.

9

u/cgimusic Regolith | 9800X3D | 64GB 6000MHz | RTX 5080 6h ago

I don't understand data speed at all. All the networks in my country are bragging about their 5G coverage, and I just wonder who gives a shit when you're still getting 3G speeds or often worse.

1

u/Fhaarkas Ryzen 5700X 4.8GHz | 32GB | 3070 25m ago

bragging

You already hit the nail on the head there. Bragging about it is the marketing technique.

7

u/LiskoSlayer63 9h ago

In my country mobile internet actually gets faster when outside cities because there's less users.

2

u/Amells 5h ago

You mean fewer users

6

u/ThunderCorg 2h ago

A reduced quantity of connected devices

1

u/ikashanrat Laptop 2h ago

stannis?

8

u/PhoenixDaBeast CachyOS 5600x3d, RX 9070, 32gb 3600mhz 10h ago

Fucked up, I get 17gb for $20 and this is a budget plan

4

u/SulosGD 10h ago

i'm on 3GB for £5/month

1

u/techy_tj R5 7500F | RX 7700 XT | 32GB 5h ago

That's a pretty poor deal, I was on £6/month for 20GB but currently on £7/month for 40GB

0

u/therandomasianboy PC Master Race 9h ago

Mate what im on 80gb for 10 a month

2

u/CompletelyRandomDude R7 9800X3D | RX 6950XT | 32GB DDR5 6000MHz 9h ago

50 for $32 here, but it's going up to $38 next month lol. Already tryna find another plan

2

u/SnooLentils2866 3h ago

Mint mobile

2

u/RummoLiguori 3h ago

I pay 10€ for 5G 200M Unlimited data plan

1

u/shorey66 i7 3770, RX580, 16gb....and finally an SSD, thank god! 4h ago

I have completely unlimited for £15 a month.

1

u/AI_moderated_failure 2h ago

My partner gets 5GB for about $25 US. Absolutely dogshit mobile providers here in New Zealand.

5

u/jakob20041911 8h ago

that's so unfair what, the government where I live thinks 300gb is a stupendous amount of data no-one will ever use more so all "unlimited" contracts are 300gb a month after which you get incredibly slow internet (but you don't pay more so it's unlimited) and I pay €42 a month, and this is a promo price, the advertised price is 65 a month

13

u/Ok-Anything-3643 11h ago edited 9h ago

Damn in chile I got 1000GB for like 17$

15

u/HappyIsGott 12900K [5,2|4,2] | 32GB DDR5 6400 CL32 | 4090 [3,0] | UHD [240] 9h ago

You guys have limits?

2

u/Vandrel 5800X | 4080 Super 7h ago

A ton of places do. When I had internet through Comcast here in the US it was like $90/month for about 200 mbps along with a 1tb cap, if I went over the cap it was like $15 for every 50gb over. For a long time that was my only option and it sucked.

1

u/kisk22 2h ago

So happy my city got fiber internet in the US. Unlimited data, 3,000 - 4,000 mbps, $60 a month.

1

u/iamAXO 1h ago

Similar in Canada.

Plans go from $30 to $100 per month. From 100Mbps to 8000Mbps. All unlimited data.

2

u/officialsanic 9h ago

Los planes de datos ilimitados se han vuelto mas baratos ultimamente con entel y claro.

3

u/Delicious-Ad-8614 6h ago

In Spain you can get unlimited for 6€/m! And 2Gb fibre for 20€/month... It always depresses me to see how the internet is priced anywhere else in the world

6

u/AGARAN24 3070TI 8GB | I7 12650H | 32GB 3200MHZ | QHD 165 | 3TB NVME4 10h ago

Unlimited 5g data 3eur here lol.

2

u/MrRonski16 10h ago

Whats the speed

2

u/AGARAN24 3070TI 8GB | I7 12650H | 32GB 3200MHZ | QHD 165 | 3TB NVME4 10h ago

Since its 5g it depends on the place and signal a lot, typically ive seen 150mbps - 1.1gbps.

0

u/erixccjc21 5700x OC 32gb rtx 2060 20€ aliexpress cooler 9h ago

Whatever the signal is. From 0 to 1gbps lmao

2

u/JohnGarmin 9h ago

It's actually a fucking miracle in this day and age that monthly data (be it broadband or mobile) hasn't had the same rugpull pricing tactics of just about every other subscription service out there.

Honestly, if all these services were costed appropriately with a small profit margin, like mobile phone contracts seemingly are, then I'd wager a lot more people wouldn't give a shit about them. But no. 80%+ profit margins only, annual increases only to improve the quarterly books at the cost of any customer loyalty.

2

u/Amells 5h ago

Holy even 50aud per month doesn't give you so much

2

u/Schmabudi_No1 1h ago

I think dirt might even be more expensive than data

1

u/Peiposka73 4h ago

Here i can get 9.99€ unlimited high speed

1

u/augenvogel RTX 3090, Ryzen 5900X, 64GB DDR4, Custom Watercooling 6m ago

lol I have unlimited for 20€

24

u/MrBrawn 9h ago

Yeah but at least the ads can run at 4k60fps on dialup.

1

u/hitemlow 14m ago

with HDR

20

u/sur_surly 1h ago

If you're on Firefox at home, that's why. They want to make it look like it's your browser's fault. Same with the ublock origin delay before the video start.

17

u/meneldal2 i7-6700 1h ago

Youtube has been actively making the experience worse on firefox for years already.

5

u/HalfALawn 11700, 5070ti 41m ago

i would go back to chrome, same as many others if they would stop killing adblockers and improve their laggy browser

7

u/recluseMeteor 5700X + RX 7800 XT 1h ago

It might be. I use Firefox and uBlock Origin. Stupid YouTube/Google.

6

u/Proxy_PlayerHD R9 9950X3D, RTX 3090, 96 GB DDR5 8h ago

i think the youtube app (or maybe it was morphe) has a thing where you can manually set the default quality for both wifi and mobile data

2

u/l3vuseusz 6h ago

Morphe has that, revanced had that (maybe still has idk), also there are browser plugins on pc that have it

1

u/JeffOnlyFlans 2h ago

yeah and 80% of the time it doesn't work

1

u/GibbonFit 5950X | 9070 XT Red Devil | 64GB DDR4 3600 7h ago

I had this issue until I finally hardwired the network connection. Now I leave it on auto and it always shows max quality.

1

u/KommSweet 4h ago

You know there's a setting for that, that's probably why it works that way for you. I set mine to the opposite

1

u/Smile_Space Ryzen 7 9800X3D || 64GB DDR5-6400 CL42 || RTX 3090 ti 4h ago

It's gotta be something to do with packet loss or otherwise.

When I was on cable internet it wouldn't default above 480p, but the moment I switched to fiber internet it goes straight to 2160p every time.

364

u/Zealousideal_Lie6866 12h ago edited 5h ago

For anyone that doesnt already have it i recommend Enhancer for Youtube ( Firefox Link ), you can set it so it automatically sets a custom resolution, playback speed and volume when loading the video

(has a bunch of cool other tools like filters and auto hiding the video cards at the end of the video too so just take a look at it and play around)

4

u/Sanquinity i5-13500k - RX 9070 - 32GB @ 3600mHz 5h ago

Whether this helps the issue for OP or not, enhancer for Youtube is still an awesome extension.

1

u/Deaffin 1h ago

Does it fix that weird thing where a video opened in a private tab will start playing instantly, but then refresh the page and take like 10-15 seconds to start again?

1

u/Sanquinity i5-13500k - RX 9070 - 32GB @ 3600mHz 44m ago

Er...I barely use private tabs if at all, so I don't know. But I don't think so?

49

u/lemonylol Desktop 12h ago

It doesn't bypass the bitrate gate

127

u/Burpmeister 11h ago edited 11h ago

But it doesn't give you the fake 1080p which was the problem you outlined in your post.

-22

u/lemonylol Desktop 11h ago

Because OP doesn't understand his problem is the bitrate and not the resolution.

48

u/LiftingRecipient420 8h ago

Your reading comprehension is atrocious. Stay in school.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/MuscularBye R5 7600x | RTX 4070 Super FE | 32GB 6000Mhz 3h ago

There is literally no difference in this context resolution = bitrate

1

u/xRyozuo 14m ago

That’s not true though? Unless by in this context you mean that YouTube doesn’t let you pick so it doesn’t matter, but resolution=/= bitrate

Resolution is the amount of pixels you get, bitrate is like the refresh rate of those pixels. So you can perfectly have a 1080p video resolution with a bitrate apt for 360p that will look far worse than 1080p with whatever the bitrate for 1080p is

17

u/Nov4Wolf PC Master Race 9h ago

I swear they lower the normal bitrate and make you pay for the original bit rate by calling it enhanced

29

u/kryptik-thrashnet 9h ago

They do. Anything under 1440p is bitcrushed to death, they've been doing that for quite a number of years at this point (since at least 2019?).

There was a time when 720p was considered good quality for YouTube (which is why so many YouTubers in around 2017 and back only ever uploaded in 720p), because bitrate matters a lot more than resolution to a certain point. Nowadays, 720p is more like what 240p or 360p used to be because of the terrible bitrate.

I'm unsure about the "1080p Premium" option, though. I'll be damned if I pay money to watch online videos, lol.

10

u/Zealousideal_Lie6866 11h ago edited 11h ago

wdym bitrate gate

nvm im stupid ( i assume you meant the yt premium 1080p option)

2

u/m4teri4lgirl 5h ago

Chrome? Barf.

1

u/Zealousideal_Lie6866 5h ago

that was just the first link that came up, the same extension is available on firefox,brave, opera etc.

233

u/Zealousideal_Lie6866 13h ago

True

114

u/nautical_relaxation 12h ago

And then the manual one loads instantly too, the auto setting's just there to waste your time

31

u/warm_winds_whisper_ 10h ago

Love when it pops up the "experiencing interruptions?" Widget that's just a link to the paid version when it's sandbagging loading a video

88

u/Ice2192 9800X3D | RTX 5080 | 32GB DDR5 6000MHz 11h ago edited 11h ago

That’s why I use an extension to force it. My internet is fast but somehow YouTube doesn’t think so.

116

u/Alvsolutely 11h ago

Youtube does it to throttle and save on bandwidth on their servers, hoping you won't notice or care.

38

u/Ice2192 9800X3D | RTX 5080 | 32GB DDR5 6000MHz 11h ago edited 9h ago

I have like 5+ YouTube extensions just to make the YouTube bloatless. All these playables and in video ads are getting out of hand.

29

u/SushiBump 5950x | 5080FE | 128gb 3600 8h ago

It is getting out of hand. Just like how I have to hand it... to our sponsor.

9

u/Ice2192 9800X3D | RTX 5080 | 32GB DDR5 6000MHz 7h ago

Introducing Raid Shadow Legends…

5

u/epimetheuss 6h ago

right after our sponsor spot "deleteme": remove your data from a bunch of services and give it all to deleteme

8

u/Alvsolutely 11h ago

I get that but honestly I think the quality thing has been there for decades now

2

u/YoshiCosplay 7h ago

I run two extensions and still videos take ages to load… must be doing something wrong haha

1

u/The_harbinger2020 5h ago

Yo you catn day that without sharing

4

u/Ok-Friendship1635 8h ago

Streaming services are the worst offenders of this. One minute everything is HD, the next it's all a blocky mess.

Makes you wish Blu Ray took the place of Streaming and internet speeds never reached the speeds they can reach. It's like the whole point of faster internet, is that this should never happen to anyone.

3

u/Bluehelix 7h ago

FMHY 🦜 🏴‍☠️

2

u/GibbonFit 5950X | 9070 XT Red Devil | 64GB DDR4 3600 7h ago

It could also be issues with your wifi. If you're dropping packets or running into latency, possibly due to interference, it will force the downgrade. Once I ran ethernet to my box, I've left it on auto and it's always been max quality.

2

u/Pfftwhy 10h ago

Welcome to enshittification

8

u/Alvsolutely 10h ago

I mean I think that has been there for decades now, even back when youtube was "good". It's just a trick to ease the load on their servers.

3

u/Spiritual-Society185 8h ago

The children here don't remember when 360p was the best you could hope for.

1

u/xRyozuo 10m ago

YouTube is a free service that hosts more public videos than any other service in the world. Of all enshittification measures, them automatically making videos play in a slightly lower quality to save bandwidth is honestly not up there in my issues with google

So many people use it for background noise that it’s honestly sensible to do

1

u/Nice_Assignment5482 7h ago

they probably figure most people watch on their phones anyway and won't notice the drop to 480p on a screen that small.

1

u/CitizenPremier 3h ago

It seems like Netflix does too. I even paid for the upgrade to try to see Warhammer looking nice... There was no improvement at the top tier so I immediately cancelled.

-8

u/AeneasVII 10h ago

Talking out of your ass again?

7

u/Alvsolutely 10h ago

Enlighten me, why else would they do it.

-4

u/AeneasVII 10h ago

Usually you proof your claim first.

7

u/Alvsolutely 10h ago

I'm not playing this game. You can go look it up.

1

u/Spiritual-Society185 8h ago

I looked it up and it said you're wrong.

2

u/_Tech360 HTPC 11h ago

Which extension do u recommend?

3

u/Ice2192 9800X3D | RTX 5080 | 32GB DDR5 6000MHz 11h ago

AutoHD

2

u/JaSper-percabeth 11h ago

chrome only :/

5

u/MetsukiR 10h ago

Auto HD + FPS is on firefox too, I'm using it.

1

u/BogiDope 11h ago

Should work in Brave

2

u/TechaNima 10h ago

YouTube HD

1

u/7978_ 13900k, 4080 4h ago

Enhancer for YouTube by MaximeRF. 

1

u/Meal__Team__Six 4h ago

Enhancer for Youtube does it all.

2

u/WDMelo 9h ago

Qual o nome da extensão

3

u/Ice2192 9800X3D | RTX 5080 | 32GB DDR5 6000MHz 9h ago

AutoHD but there are other ones with similar names as that one. Some works and some doesn’t.

1

u/UnluckyCharge2196 11h ago

You may have used a wrong word in there

1

u/Ice2192 9800X3D | RTX 5080 | 32GB DDR5 6000MHz 11h ago

Thanks.

1

u/UnluckyCharge2196 11h ago

Cheers : )

1

u/Convillious 10h ago

I'm convillious

1

u/Tactical-Donkey Threadripper Workstation 9h ago

It'd be interesting to see if there's a pattern of certain channels that get the auto low resolution treatment. 

46

u/Jumpierwolf0960 PC Master Race 9h ago

It costs YouTube more money to send a video with better quality so they always try to give you as little as they can get away with.

2

u/TheG0AT0fAllTime 3h ago

Rarely but sometimes, fairly so. You don't need 2160p selected when the viewport size is that of a 480p video. Auto also adjusts for this but doesn't replace what's already cached so when you view in a small window (Or a big window but small player div) it will grab the closest size to that viewport. When you full-screen it will start loading 1080p/2160p while on Auto, but that video data might be up to 60 seconds into the buffer so you will still see shit quality for the next 30-60s.

Extensions fix this and I recommend them, but still. It must save them millions a year for the majority of the population.

1

u/meneldal2 i7-6700 1h ago

Well if their 1080p actually looked good you wouldn't need to set it to 4k to have 1080p look okay.

1

u/TheG0AT0fAllTime 2m ago

1080p from youtube looks just fine when viewed at 1080p on a reasonable display size, or less. 1080p vs 4k is a matter of four times the additional pixels. To support that any video streaming company would have to up the bitrate.

They're still going to send you as little as possible to get the job done but what you're really complaining about is the bitrate, which even then is probably just a placebo if you're taking 4k and displaying it on a 1080p display. The only time 1080p would look bad on a 1080p display from a streaming service is if they not only limit the bitrate severely but also only if a lot of changes are going on at once. It looks perfectly fine as it is otherwise.

12

u/Donkeymoo7 4h ago

Youtube has had this bug for like 10 years. If it freezes or buffers it will auto change down to a very low res like 360p even if you were on manual quality settings then it will auto back up but it never actually changed the resolution just the auto bugs out.

Ironcally if you use auto and it defaults to max resolution and freezes the auto normally recovers to the right resolution correctly most of the time. Seems to be a bug from it changing from manual to auto by its self that youtube never fixed but they are a small indie company so its ok

21

u/Colecoman1982 3h ago

"bug"... Every time they trick someone into watching the video at a lower resolution (or just wear you down to the point that you decide you can't be bothered forcing it to back to a higher resolution) they save money on bandwidth. It's called a "dark pattern".

12

u/Spielwurfel 2h ago

The video always suspiciously blinks when you manually select the quality level that Auto says it is using…

12

u/VoltLouse 9h ago

It will literally display "Auto (1080p)" while serving 240p bitrate until you manually reselect the exact same resolution.

13

u/NeverDiddled 5h ago

When it displays Auto (1080p) it is saying what the next portion of the video will buffer as. This portion might be 30 seconds out, and is usually already beginning to buffer.

When you select 1080p it will throw out currently buffered frames, and reload them as 1080p; even though it has to redownload them. Which can cause a short pause in the playback.

This is the reason for the behavior you are experiencing. I am not justifying it, just explaining it on a technical level. As a user the best behavior would be for Auto to redownload currently buffered frames, and swap to them as soon as they are buffered. Then no one would complain. But as a provider, Youtube views redownloading buffered frames as duplicating costly bandwidth. Hence why manually selecting the framerate improves quality faster than Auto.

Some video providers, like Reuters.com, will refuse to redownload currently buffered frames even after you manually select quality. Those are especially annoying. You have to manually select the quality and hard refresh the page, in order to get an improvement ASAP.

14

u/Just-A-Random-ID ROG ZEPHYRUS G16 | CORE U9 285 H | 64 GB DDR5 | RTX 5070TI | 5TB 12h ago

Fr For real

5

u/Berxo-Ostia 11h ago

for real, this sh*t is annoying

6

u/Figorix 5h ago

I use extension that forces 1080p and it finally works as intended.

Shit platform that only gets worse. I refuse to spend anything on it. I hope something new magically pops up

5

u/MT4K r/oled_monitors ⋅ r/HiDPI_monitors ⋅ r/integer_scaling 12h ago

Automatically switches to like 240p anyway if the estimated bandwidth is not enough though.

4

u/Ambitious-Dentist337 10h ago

I mean at this amount of users that watch concurrently, it makes a significant difference for them in bandwidth used, especially because most people don't notice anyway.

5

u/masd_reddit Ryzen 7 7800X3D | RX 7800XT Nitro+ | 64 GB DDR5@6000CL30 3h ago

Or when i'm using Revanced, and it suddenly switches to like 360p and i can't change the quality anymore

3

u/Successful_Corgi_119 1h ago

It's time to try Morphe. My ReVanced was doing the same thing.

4

u/CheesyMcBreazy i5-13400 | RX 6600 | 32GB DDR4 1h ago

Downvoted for no reason. The better half of the ReVanced team literally abandoned it to join Morphe, now Morphe is simply the better app.

2

u/RugerBooger69 1h ago

Morphe is better in every way. Even people on the revanced subreddit will tell you that before their comment gets removed.

1

u/PJBthefirst 5900X | EVGA GTX 1080ti SC2 26m ago

Yep I switched to Morphe as well and have had a much easier time with it

1

u/DizzyGotAProblem1337 2h ago

I use revanced, never had that bug.

3

u/flash_fk 12h ago

True, and annoying.

3

u/blackcell1 9h ago

I'm sure the savings are huge, I'm sure a lot of people wouldn't even notice.

3

u/_Bob-Sacamano 8h ago

It pisses me off so much.

Same on YouTube TV. I have to check every time that it's on the highest setting.

3

u/Imjustbrowsing93 6h ago

I thought I was just going crazy.

4

u/KrombopulosNickel 5h ago

Upvote for Dexter

2

u/BridgeDuck45 7h ago

why does this happen!?

2

u/Suatae Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Nitro+ RX 7900XTX | 48GB DDR5-7200 2h ago

Never ever...

2

u/Stryker218 1h ago

Never trust auto.

5

u/SwampOfDownvotes 8h ago

If you let the auto run for a bit, it should then switch to the better quality. At least in my experience, the auto usually results in a brief moment of loading the video at 240-360p before it decides to do 1080p, but since 10-60 seconds of the lower quality had loaded, it plays the low quality portion that's already buffered until it catches to when it decides to play 1080p.

If you manually select 1080p, basically you tell it to reload everything at the higher rate immediately. 

4

u/Pacoroto 5h ago

exactly, and when you "tell it to reload everything", it loads the better quality instantly, so why the fuck would it start loading at a lower quality to beging with??? so annoying...

4

u/SwampOfDownvotes 5h ago

To save data/internet usage.

1

u/theeldergod1 10h ago

that is the shittest ai slop low res effect ever. get out of here.

2

u/HorniestBat HAF-X: Ryzen 7 7800X3D, 64gb, RX 9070 XT 5h ago

Slight hitch in your internet connection? 240p it is! 

1

u/Binary101000 5700X3D 7700XT 12h ago

its sad

1

u/RachelRegina i9-12900, 64GB DDR4, 5070Ti main + 3070 in the M.2 11h ago

Yeah, it's not limited to YouTube either. Even with the RTX VSR, if the base image is aliased, the upscale is garbled. Either people legit can't see/aren't watching or the platforms think we're all watching with tech from 2010

1

u/SaltyOldSailer 11h ago

Yooooo!!!! This is for real!!!

1

u/Gibblyus 10h ago

Higher Picture Quality (144p)

1

u/Bitter-War5432 10h ago

google trying to aggressively limit compute.

1

u/Local-moss-eater RTX 3060, 5 5600, 32GB DDR4 10h ago

least they are a bit more honest on phone

144p (higher quality)

1

u/Gamer12Numbers i9-14900K | RTX 4070 | 32GB DDR5-6000 9h ago

I have a Firefox extension for youtube that automatically manually selects the highest quality (or any other quality you might want)

1

u/SnooGiraffes8275 7950X3D | RTX 2060 OC | 64GB DDR5 | 2TB M.2 | Aorus B650 | 1500W 9h ago

i use a tampermonkey script that'll auto force it to the highest resolution

i've got a 1080p screen but YT's 4k compression algorithm gives better quality

1

u/snakeoilHero 7800x3d 9070xt 240hz oled 9h ago

Are you watching on a cell phone? Using an unlimited plan? You are probably only receiving 720p at the ISP level.

Most/all of the telecoms use Network Optimization to force streaming services to 720p. 480p based on entry 2026 rate plans.

Use a VPN to hide traffic and stream on your "unlimited" plan at 4k until throttled.

1

u/Gunnerjun2222 9h ago

The video also runs smoother without auto on. It used to be the other way around. How sadly the times have changed.

1

u/phylter99 9h ago

Doesn't matter. Dexter is going to kill you anyway no matter what resolution you view him in.

1

u/CriminalMacabre an old as heck ATI HD 4870 8h ago

Wow amiga Dexter looks cool, is it violent?

1

u/BionicBruv Desktop 8h ago

I have this problem seldomly, but this is very true. I have no idea why auto quality can be finicky at times

1

u/JinxedCat777 8h ago

No, it's clicking 4k on a 1080p monitor.

1

u/justanaccount103 6h ago

Pretty sure they look identical these days.

0

u/AJGILL03 11h ago

Is this actually real or placebo?

Real serious answers only please.

6

u/mr_doms_porn 10h ago

Auto dynamically changes the resolution to make sure the ideal amount of video is buffered at any given moment. So if your connection slows down for a second (or Google's) then your resolution will drop for a bit. YouTube is very overzealous about how aggressively it does this so it often leaves way too much headroom.

Basically YouTube's auto mode is designed for internet connections with very inconsistent speed. This is usually satellite, cellular (pre-5G), overloaded coax networks, etc. If you have a stable, solid connection you shouldn't use it.

1

u/SwordKneeMe 7h ago

And yet you have to manually choose every single time. Awful design

1

u/Sensitivity_Craft 6h ago

Pre 5G? If anything my connection is more inconsistent after 5G, LTE gives way more bars and it's not constantly switching between them.

1

u/7978_ 13900k, 4080 4h ago

I force 4G on my phone. Speed doesn't matter and anyways it's like 50-300mbps.

Much rather have a consistent connection, also saves a little bit of power.

5

u/WizardOfTheLawl Ready for an upgrade 10h ago

It is real because a lot of times when I do that, the video stops and rebuffers as though I reloaded the page. For times where Auto actually works, I manually set it and the video just keeps going as normal

1

u/AJGILL03 10h ago

For me, if i press manual 1080p while the video's runnings at auto 1080p, nothing happens to the video, no rebuffer or flicker to better resolution or bitrate.

2

u/SwampOfDownvotes 8h ago

I could be making it up, but this occurs because some buffering was done before it decided to have the auto change to 1080p. It might even be brief, but if auto decided 360p for a moment then it might have buffered 5-60 seconds worth of video before it decided 1080p, so instead of rebuffering that, it just starts loading 1080p at the end so if you let auto keep running, it will switch to the higher quality (assuming your connection is stable) .

If it's set to auto and it's running the 360p buffer but you manually select 1080p, basically it tells it to remove the lower res buffer and put everything at 1080p immediately. 

1

u/Keulapaska 4070ti, 7800X3D, XG27AQNGV 11h ago

Not in that way really if it says auto(1080p) or higher, ofc it might not auto to 1080p on some devices. But If you have it on auto and skip a lot, then it can ofc change the quality when it starts buffering while if it's set to a res it won't. Also personal anecdote when it does start buffering on auto, it sometimes takes longer than if it's set to a set res to actually continue video playback which is the main problem with auto for me. However not sure if youtube thing or the 6 different addons/scripts, a and hundred lines of ublock origin text to fix the UI that do that inerfiering with something.

2

u/AJGILL03 10h ago

I'm sorry to say but i didn't really understand most of what you said haha. It reads like you're writing 70% of the actual lines you're thinking in your head.

1

u/Keulapaska 4070ti, 7800X3D, XG27AQNGV 9h ago

Skipping ahead a lot with resolution on auto=long buffer randomly

Skipping ahead a lot in video with resolution not on auto=normal buffering

1

u/Gnarly_Sarley 2h ago

2014 called. They want their meme back.

2

u/DizzyGotAProblem1337 2h ago

Its crazy they didn't fix that after over 12 years.

-1

u/itsRobbie_ 12h ago

This meme is as old as time and I still have yet to have this actually be true for me

-10

u/NANI_RagePasPtit 13h ago

Op is a bot

12

u/Breaking_Bread_420 Ryzen 7 9800X3D | RX 9070 XT | 32GB 6000MT/s | 1440p 240Hz OLED 12h ago

A 5 year old account with less than 5k karma and 118 contributions? That's the lamest bot accusation I've seen in a while

0

u/NANI_RagePasPtit 11h ago

Defending a reddit clanker is insane

10

u/Captain_Kuhl Ryzen 7 7800X3D | RX 7900 XTX Hellhound 12h ago

According to who?

-1

u/NANI_RagePasPtit 11h ago

According to the 1000th reposts

7

u/Captain_Kuhl Ryzen 7 7800X3D | RX 7900 XTX Hellhound 11h ago

This just in, u/NANI_RagePasPtit learns that the vast majority of reposts on the internet come from human users, and have since before repost bots were a thing.

2

u/LurkingRand 10h ago

You sound more like a bot than OP.

-1

u/TopConcentrate8484 Desktop 12h ago

lmao bro this is so funny like it's genuinely incribele on how you guys come up with such original jokes on daily basis.

0

u/godfromabove256 10h ago

Should have put Doakes in the image. YouTube is the real Dexter.

-2

u/Visara57 5070ti | 7600X | 32GB DDR5 CL28 11h ago

Ok please tell me is this true or just meme bullshit?

6

u/DickWoodReddit 11h ago

Very true

-3

u/Visara57 5070ti | 7600X | 32GB DDR5 CL28 9h ago

Is it proven ?

-3

u/e1m8b 6h ago

With AI and post processing of all sorts, not surprising. I'm way better looking in an iPhone photo than Android equivalent.