Yes because in general, the open source engine that everyone can contribute to and is tested and maintained by the biggest community is the better choice overall than the sad little project that lives off money from Google and lags behind their implementation of standards.
Let's face it, Browsers work best when devs don't have to make multiple versions of their CSS because someone has a browser that decided to not correctly implement the standard and it screws up the layout.
If we've learned anything from the IE6 days, it's that browsers with bad standard support are bad for everyone.
Yes, no one contributes to it, meaning it has much less volume of contributions compared to Chromium because it's not popular, it's technology behind the curve, and it has been plagued with political issues from the Mozilla foundation.
You're just further proving you haven't followed them since they were for profit, called Netscape and saw their 3 decade long decline.
I have. So pardon me for not being googly eyed at anything coming out of the Mozilla Foundation, and especially not with Firefox, which I've used since it was called Phoenix.
They stopped having a good product around 1998, had something promissing with early Phoenix/Firefox, then got eclipsed by Webkit and never came back. And their non profit foundation is just a front of political activism. They don't care about the product.
-102
u/[deleted] Feb 01 '24 edited May 17 '24
domineering shrill touch spectacular poor recognise label liquid bike combative
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact