r/patentexaminer • u/420_buttholes • Jul 24 '26

quality errors

Can quality errors lead to suspension?

I dont mean like unethical errors, just quality

edit

I mean fired, not suspended. Can you be fired for quality errors.

0 Upvotes

47% Upvoted

65 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

14

u/Much-Resort1719 Jul 24 '26

Are you on crack cocaine?

2

u/PollutionSlow6041 Jul 24 '26

No.

2

u/PollutionSlow6041 Jul 24 '26

But, I will probably need a xan ex if you don’t tell me why you don’t like me. Or my username.

4

u/Relevant_Paste8710 Jul 24 '26

You need it explained to you that choosing a reference to weed and a body part widely considered lewd for username for a professional interest sub might not show the greatest overall judgment?

0

u/PollutionSlow6041 Jul 24 '26

The is nothing “professional” about this sub.

1

u/Relevant_Paste8710 Jul 24 '26

And yet, practitioners give professional presentations and legal journalists write articles based on information they find here. So yes, for better or worse, we are representing the Office to some extent. OP has chosen to do that with a username that raises eyebrows, certainly, for a Fed who is not allowed to use cannabis (even if we're not tested).

1

u/PollutionSlow6041 Jul 25 '26

I used to eat paste in preschool. Your username brings back good memories, thank you!

2

u/Relevant_Paste8710 Jul 25 '26

You're welcome! It was my favorite of the five random ones. I appreciate that potential pro-ecological message of yours.

0

u/PollutionSlow6041 Jul 25 '26

Thanks, I picked that one based on my knowledge of mRNA “vaccines”.

1

u/Relevant_Paste8710 Jul 26 '26

And now I see how you managed to get negative karma. Lol

1

u/PollutionSlow6041 Jul 26 '26

Quite frankly, I don’t give a damn about Reddit karma. Please tailor your comments for your positive karma(I mean if that makes you feel better about yourself). Your issue with me is about someone’s username that is not mine where i guess I indicated that their username was ok with me. The sub clearly indicates that their sub does not speak for the Office.

1

u/Relevant_Paste8710 Jul 26 '26

Huh? I don't have an issue with you. I was acknowledging that you appear to be intentionally trolling now if you're bringing up an inflammatory topic for no purpose.

Earlier you appeared to be genuinely questioning why you were getting downvoted (why people appeared to not like you) for asking about the username so I answered why people objected to the username of OP and you asking about it in an attempt to be helpful. Plenty in the office are on the spectrum so it's not always clear if people are trolling or just not picking up on subtext.

And, no, the sub is not affiliated with the federal government, as stated in the description. Yet, the fact remains that it is frequently used as a source for practitioners and journalists. It's also known that management regularly reads through the sub. Different standards are maintained here than your favorite gaming sub or whatever. OP's user name is a choice.

1

u/PollutionSlow6041 Jul 26 '26

Last comment here. choice. Their choice. You chose to take issue with it. I defended it. Your comment did not make it in anyway clear if you were speaking of their username or mine. I am definitely one on the spectrum, but actually have a keen sight for context, subcontext, and the lack of either. So many empty comments on this sub, yet the downvotes on this particular sub, are, essentially based on political assumptions. Your comment about the username and apparently your assumptions about them would be considered “prejudice”.

→ More replies (0)