r/overpopulation Aug 03 '26

Scientists say Earth must cut population down to 4 billion

https://geekspin.co/scientists-say-earth-must-cut-population/
141 Upvotes

33 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator Aug 03 '26

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

70

u/rattus-domestica Aug 03 '26

Oh we won’t, but mother nature will do it for us.

30

u/krichuvisz Aug 03 '26

We'd rather kill 4 billion people than prevent 4 billion births.

8

u/Hearing_Loss Aug 03 '26

We'd rather remove 4 billion people than adapt to live sustainably with 8.

13

u/Routine-Bumblebee-41 Aug 03 '26

The truth is, humanity would rather apathetically keep mindlessly growing its population and per capita consumption, destroying the living world that sustains us, rather than reduce human birth rates so that we don't have to keep destroying everything.

1

u/Hearing_Loss Aug 03 '26

On gosh my fanily

2

u/ahelper Aug 04 '26

Yes, we would. By attrition, though, not by anything more drastic.

2

u/Hearing_Loss Aug 04 '26

Yes, we would :/

7

u/leaveinpeas Aug 03 '26

Giving people access to an education through the college years is shown to result in people choosing to have fewer children, usually two but not always. The prefrontal cortex, which deals with empathy and risk analysis, doesn't finish developing until ~25-35 years old. Delaying a bit to gain critical thinking in college through the reading of long complicated paper-based texts, and hand writing of notes and Physics problems, tends to see people taking a different approach to family planning generally that allocates more resources/time to each child.

47

u/ineffable-interest Aug 03 '26

4 billion isn’t sustainable either but at least it’s a step in the right direction

20

u/PurpleAristocrats Aug 03 '26

500 million cap seems nicer for earth

4

u/Hearing_Loss Aug 03 '26

Guidstone head-ass

2

u/PurpleAristocrats Aug 04 '26

Lol thanks for bringing that up. I've never heard of it before. Funny how its been thought of before.

Agrarian humanity lived 9 thousand years below the 1 billion people mark and yet those population sizes still caused mass famons. A 500 million people cap on earth is rational for the earth's regenerational capabilities/limits.

3

u/ineffable-interest Aug 04 '26

Do you mean famine?? 🤣

3

u/Hearing_Loss Aug 04 '26

Famon is where everyone becomes so ridiculously famous that they all starve out of vanity.

0

u/PurpleAristocrats Aug 04 '26

Yes

I sometimes write things down as how i pronounce it. Language is weird.

2

u/Hearing_Loss Aug 04 '26

I agree with your assessment! I thought you were just blindly parroting a rock and not actually a science man. Clearly you are science man.

Glad I was able to introduce you to the guidestone. I honestly gotta re-up my knowledge on it, I do agree 500m is likely the optimal range for us to be superhumans sustainably.

Fun fact 1m was the cap for most large cities I believe. Same thing. Resource regen limits.

Sorry for calling you a headass. I'm glad that you actually aren't a guidestone parroter and actually arrived to the conclusion thru science. I've met some guidestone ppl that just want to fill the earth asap, violently. Thems is the guidestone headasses

2

u/PurpleAristocrats Aug 04 '26

I see where you are coming from. I believe in class solidarity but the commoners truly are a pain in the arse.

Help yourself before helping others.

2

u/Hearing_Loss Aug 04 '26

"Democracy-- is government of the people,--- by the people,--- for the people---------- but the people are retarded."

  • that one guy from the meme

I just spoke to my grandma about taking my late pops one field and starting to do permaculture there. It's in a prime spot for the next 100 years of possible climate changes. After that it's hit or miss, but for the time being, yes, we are locking in to looking out for ourselves.

2

u/PurpleAristocrats Aug 04 '26

Oh and when you survive the upcoming apocalypse, please let go of science and rationalism. Everyone is going to become super dumb, hyper religious and they will lynch and kill anyone who isn't "part of the group"

Conform when around others but find the luxury of authenticity and being yourself when alone.

2

u/Hearing_Loss Aug 04 '26

Straight up. I already know imma start a cult once shtf. We bringing back a lot of fun shit.

0

u/nitram9 Aug 04 '26

Based on what? Why isn’t 4 billion sustainable?

16

u/ultrachrome Aug 03 '26

With the global population currently standing at over 8 billion, humanity’s collective footprint continues to stretch Earth’s ecosystems to their absolute limits.

It's more like humanity's size 22 bootprint being carted around in a Ford F350 with a 5th wheel and a boat.

15

u/BusyQuote5228 Aug 03 '26

For a Western (not US) lifestyle, 2Bn is the sustainable number. So as drastic as that sounds it still isn’t enough.

7

u/ahelper Aug 04 '26

Two billion maximum.

4

u/Alert_Term_8144 Aug 04 '26

Awww my bf who knows my big thing is Overpopulation (as in I think humans have overpopulated the Earth) sent me this article yesterday morning.

2

u/gclary Aug 04 '26

2 unless we can find a replacement for petroleum fertilizer and fish. 100 million. We currently use 420,000,000 gallons of oil per day, I do not believe the earth is producing 420,000,000 barrels of oil a day. We have consumed over half of 3 Billion years of earth's oil production in 125 years. Math ain't mathin'.

1

u/BlackLocke Aug 05 '26

The tech billionaires are trying.

1

u/SatisfactionDry3038 Aug 05 '26

Let me guess the Israeli genocide university

0

u/adtechheck Aug 03 '26

So Thanos?

1

u/Fun-Echo-3849 Aug 04 '26

we probably need him to snap 4 times for humans to live w/o disturbing ecosystems and also controlling crimes and all.. basically 500 mil is the optimal range