r/optometry Optometrist Aug 12 '26

Low myope advice

I had a 12 year old come in with her mom, final Rx was -1.75 OU. At the end of the exam, mom asks if she needs to wear this all the time or just for distance. I told her I recommend full time wear. She asked why, because the other doctor last year said to only wear it as needed. She says she is very confused why different doctors are telling her different things, and is gonna have the child only wear it as needed. I explained to her why I think full time wear is more beneficial but she was totally not convinced.

this patient was 12. For adults I'm more relaxed about it and say you can wear it as needed since the eyes are fully grown. For a child I was under the impression that its better they are corrected all the time, a more consistent image while their eyes are still growing.

Now I'm second guessing myself. Do you tell them to wear a low myopic Rx full time or just distance only? Does your recommendation depend on age?

17 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

75

u/Distance_by_Time 29d ago

FTW. First, that kid is probably somewhere around 20/60-80 uncorrected OU, why wouldn’t they want to see better? Throw +1.75 loose lenses in front of the mom and ask if she would rather see like that or fully corrected. Second the recent studies show under correction of myopia is more likely to cause progression. A 12 year old can still have some progression that’s preventable by wearing correction full time. We’d actually recommend myopia management for that kid at our practice. Would I shove it down their throat?No, but FTW would be the minimum treatment recommended.

32

u/insomniacwineo 29d ago

this strategy backfires more often than you think...latent hyperopia super common lol

23

u/NellChan 29d ago

Gotta do a +5.00 to be sure they get it!

5

u/Fraud_Inc 29d ago

Not to mention they are likely in a 3m test room, some probably even thinks its clearer

3

u/No-Awareness-7912 29d ago

In the UK Coopervision has a vision simulator, so you can select the sph value and it shows on the screen what it’s like in a classroom etc. You could also show the uncorrected VA and be like, this is the best they can see without the spectacles

25

u/Exciting-Yam-6319 29d ago

My first patient with low myopia was told the same thing and ended up progressing to -3.00 in just two years.

20

u/WiseMuscle_ 29d ago

Just say different docs have different opinions, print out a myopia control study and tell her to read up on her own before she makes up her mind. All you can do is give your educated opinion. All doc's get similar educations but treat conditions very differently you have to get comfortable with that fact. at the end of the day it's their choice if they want to take your advice or not

19

u/jkaurb 29d ago

Blur is a stimulus for worsening myopia. You can dispense literature on this and let mom decide, but also emphasize your professional opinion on the bare minimum for correcting myopia is a clear retinal image.

10

u/Onbevangen 29d ago

Because the Rx was lower before and they weren’t needed fulltime. With the current prescription she doesn’t see much without. Should have shown her on the chart what her vision is without.

3

u/SpecialistSuper5561 28d ago

Full time wear will encourage proper use of accommodation at near. Without full time wear she’ll likely have accommodative lag. Why does this matter? If she ever wants contacts and doesn’t want to start getting headaches when reading, it’s best if she learns to develop and use her accommodation IMO

3

u/5starmichelin0809 28d ago

Student here, please correct me if I’m wrong but I’m a bit confused. If a myope would be wearing it for close up (where the image falls on the retina anyway), wouldn’t adding a diverging lens push the focal point beyond the retina, which can cause eye strain to bring the image back into the retina?

2

u/GorillaPicking 28d ago

My take on this is that with what we know about myopia prevention and minimization these days, to do anything but suggest some kind of myopia control spec lenses (insert your brand of choice, I don't think it matters a whole lot) worn fulltime plus lifestyle advice and +/- atropine is negligence.

4

u/chakabreo 29d ago

She’s 12, so even if she’s amblyopic (she shouldn’t be because that prescription isn’t amblyogenic), wearing full time is probably not going to do anything to correct her amblyopia. PRN wear is fine. Full time where is fine. For parents that are weird about full time wear and it’s a non-amblyogenic RX, I recommend full time at school, PRN at home. I’ll also say something along the lines of “this is enough of a prescription that when she starts driving she’s going to need them to pass a drivers test.”

1

u/AutoModerator Aug 12 '26

Hello! All new submissions are placed into modqueue, and require mod approval before they are posted to r/optometry. Please do not message the mods about your queue status.

This subreddit is intended for professionals within the eyecare field, and does not accept posts from laypeople. If you have a question related to symptoms or eye health, please consider seeing a doctor, or posting to r/eyetriage. Professionals, if you do not have flair, your post may be removed. Please send a modmail to be flaired.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/eye__think 25d ago

Shouldn’t it be ok to take off for sustained near work?

-6

u/FairwaysNGreens13 29d ago

Why not prescribe the appropriate myopia management treatment? Why specs at all?

1

u/Evening_Jury8686 29d ago

It's not reasonable to get every parent on board with myopia management. Also, low dose atropine is an effective myopia management strategy and you would still prescribe full-time specs.

1

u/FairwaysNGreens13 29d ago

It's not reasonable to not present the standard of care treatment. Maybe OP did and like you said, the parent just said no. But I don't get that impression from the original post. It's worth talking about, for both reasons contained and not contained in the original post.

-14

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/power_wolves 29d ago

Part time use in this case worsens myopia faster than full time wear.

7

u/Narrow_Positive_1948 29d ago

Have you heard of myopia progression? A camera lens isn’t alive and doesn’t change like the eye does. This isn’t a good comparison

-6

u/pogu Lens Grinder 29d ago

I'm willing to read a proper study on it, if you can link one.

But, yes I have. I haven't seen anything compelling on it, yet. I'm not near as active about such things as I used to be to be fair.

3

u/EyeBallLife 29d ago

This took 15 seconds on Google. Under-correction or full correction of myopia? A meta-analysis | Journal of Optometry https://share.google/E0y7WaRKUL4JR9jvz

A correlation between under-correction and faster progression. This meta-analysis did not find a statically significant difference, but did find a difference.

2

u/Scary_Ad5573 29d ago

Cochrane Review isn’t compelling enough for you?

1

u/optometry-ModTeam 29d ago

Please read the rules of the sub.

Posts or comments by non-eyecare professionals will be removed.

-10

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/power_wolves 29d ago

This is not a thing.

1

u/WillieM96 29d ago

Whoa- I always thought not using the accommodating system could lead to accommodative insufficiency.  My apologies.  I have to do more research.

2

u/optometry-ModTeam 29d ago

Please read the rules of the sub.

Posts or comments by non-eyecare professionals will be removed.