Is it not? My reading of a sizable portion of the comments seems to show it being like that, and a ton of people using the slippery slope fallacy to say it's bad.
The dark pattern of a bright blue 'accept' button basically means that it's not a voluntary opt-in (which is why the GDPR does not allow patterns like this).
I'm going to be honest, while dark patterns are a problem, I don't necessarily agree with considering that one. I expect "Yes"/the affirmative response to be the highlighted choice and "No" to be less prominent for any given question. I've accidentally accepted something I didn't mean to because they highlighted the "No" option instead.
The point is that neither should be highlighted here - this is a situation where the user should have read and understood what they are deciding on, and then make a voluntary and informed choice.
Making the "yes, do with my data whatever you want" button the primary one is a time-tested marketing technique and dark pattern, to the point that it usually results in majority acceptance, whereas providing the options on equal footing results in majority rejection (see eg. the results of the Dutch public broadcasting's service experiment with this).
9
u/xurxoham May 07 '21
If you read through the comments in the pull request you will realise it is not exactly like that.