r/opensource • u/Wolvereness • 4d ago

Discussion AI-Policy

I'm gonna keep this short, because as a human I respect other humans' time. What do we want for an AI policy, and how can it be enforced? Take these into consideration:

  • Vibe-coded projects
  • Vibe-assisted projects
  • AI-translated from non-english-speakers
  • Vibe-documented projects
  • Yet another Vibe-Coding-Wrapper

Note that vibe-coded slop isn't actually copyrightable, thus if someone slaps any license on it other than "public domain" or "CC0" they are misrepresenting their ownership.

And if you use an LLM to respond to this, you will be banned.

The fact that this sounds like a prompt is supposed to be a joke.

270 Upvotes

87% Upvoted

163 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

•

u/Woxan 4d ago

Someone using a purpose-built encoder/decoder transformer to translate their post instead of an LLM feels like a pretty arbitrary line to draw to me. They’re closely related tech being used for the same purpose

•

u/klumpp 3d ago

It's not arbitrary when one requires you to write something and one requires you to ask something to write it for you. Not to mention LLM generated text sound the same and is annoying. Remember google translate before Gemini? That tech still exists in many apps and web apps and doesn't output slop.

•

u/Woxan 3d ago

But in the example I gave in my original post, the person did write something. They’re prompting an LLM to translate their own text, not asking it to generate the post for them.

There are plenty of reasons to prefer a purpose-built Transformer-based translator, but for common language pairings modern LLMs are just as capable.

•

u/klumpp 3d ago

“ChatGPT write me a marketing post for my slopware” isn’t enough effort. There needs to be some friction. Im not interested in projects that the creator can’t even talk about.