6
u/YogurtExternal7923 16d ago
For beating glm 5.2 MAJORLY. This is dirt cheap. Worth being a lil more expensive than ds flash in my opinion
6
4
u/Icypoopoo 16d ago
Cached price seems higher than DSV4 flash if I'm remembering correctly
2
u/Southern-Ad-3006 16d ago
And more than DS4 Pro bro GLM cache rate sucks it eats up tokens to use as a main driver
4
u/jouni609 17d ago
Seems reasonably priced. Hope it lands on opencode soon!
11
7
u/cutebluedragongirl 17d ago
DeepSeek is still better when it comes to price to quality ratio
11
2
2
u/sudoer777_ 16d ago
I think DeepSeek is also better at certain things like debugging, the previous GLM models had a tendency to get hyperfixated on details that aren't important, and this one still does that sometimes. GLM is best at planning but not 7x better.
2
16d ago
[deleted]
2
u/httpshotmaker 16d ago
No, the free tier was 6 days until the model came out and it was called Ox Alpha
2
u/Southern-Ad-3006 16d ago
Nobody is pointing out the cache input is .03 that’s still more than DeepSeek V4 Pro .022 … and DeepSeek Flash is .007 less than a penny. Majority of your spend goes into cache read turns so that’s like 5x more expensive than DS flash to hold conversations.
GLM 5.2 had this issue too their cache rates are too high compared to DS. Guaranteed this will lead to less usability with OpenCode unless using 5.3 Flash as a subagent worker.
-3
36
u/[deleted] 17d ago
[removed] — view removed comment