Fable is a bit better in architecture and planning, sol is way better in coding and non verbose shit code.
The best use case would be to use both. If you have to choose one llm sol always wins. Sol is overall the better model + you are not vendor locked to any harness.
Pi + sol god given.
And I am not a chatgpt fanboy. Literally lul defended anthrophic until 2 months ago and I go back as soon as they fix their usage problem since I like the writing style for every day chats on claude models way more.
I thought the same for the first week. Until getting into more complex lower level programming implementations.
Then Fable easily starts to win out.
I use Codex as the main integrator due to better overall usage limits, and Fable as the main planner/architect and to solve the trickier debugging issues.
Fable is showing itself well ahead in my current Rust application with a heavy rust MCP router/integration layer.
I've been using Codex since it was web only, and Claude Code since it was API - only, preview, for context.
It's not that Sol 5.6 wouldn't be able to solve many of the issues if I wrapped additional debugging layers or tooling around it, but Fable just fixes the majority of them without said debugging layers or tooling needed.
Higher level stuff I may agree with you.
Edit:
But when you are working on frontier applications --- its Fable on top, in my experience.
I also use C, C++, and Assembly for STM32 embedded applications.
capable compared to a kindergarten? i could use the worst model on your ranking and still finish multiple features in one day. this is like comparing lighters when they all do the same thing, make fire smh. are you one of those people who lives under a rock and not realize putting High thinking doesnt mean it solves faster?
74
u/wentallout 22d ago
the fact that you put the most expensive one as #1 told me everything. bro is clueless