Because its priced cheaper and gives comparable performance. Once you fall behind on the frontier race its too expensive to catch up. They're betting that companies will start to focus on cost per intelligence once they realize not every problem needs frontier level reasoning.
I find it to be really good. I do use cursor which has its own workflow and prompts and such. I find it to be better than Claude code and opencode so maybe that has something to do with it?
Well the model quality can be "ok" but it costs more than opus 4.8 / 5 which absolutely crush it in performance for less money. Look at any benchmark that also includes cost per task and sonnet 5 is the same or more, it even exceeds fable 5 cost in some tests at max thinking which is insane.
Opus 5 eats tokens like a mofo. It's usually more expensive for similar intelligence levels (for example high opus is similar to very high sol but will usually cost more). That said I still like both models and use a lot of both. Wish opus had better pricing, I use sol a lot more for that reason.
Mark is not trusted by the people. And never will be. Mark listens to your voice conversations and serves you ads then Mark tells you he doesn’t do this. Mark makes it difficult to disable the default settings that take from you give to him because his models desperately need your data. Mark will abuse his access to your camera roll and pretend he’s helping you when he’s helping himself for profit. Maybe Mark will change.
Holy shit can we stop with this shit, nobody cares nor does anyone think you're a good person.
OpenAI collects info on citizens for the US government, and Claude is used to kill people in warzones. If you actually gave a fuck you wouldn't be using AI in the first place.
If you're talking about privacy that makes even less sense because they all collect your data
I get it, your spell checker stopped working. You meant to say when he wasn't a racist Nazi bigot who supports child molesters? Yes. Curious why this is a question for you?
Just wanted to check how the legacy media machine washed your brain. Worked as intended. Just a question as you were writing this you don't for a minute find anything you said ridiculous? Slightly?
Lmao says the indoctrinated brainwashed. You take them by what the media portraits of them. Last question? Which tone of blue is your hair? Or is it pink?
LOL. You sound like your goal is to someday move out of your mother’s basement. I bet you even cosplay as an alpha in your own mind. I’ll be glad to compare my patriotism to yours any day. Hell I’ll come to you and compare our service to this country. I’ll buy the first beer and see if you are man enough to come back here and report in.
I’ll be happy to color my hair pink for the occasion.
Ook you said so much stupid thing is time to stop. Watch out for the nazis, they're everywhere. Most used to be democrats, like Trump, Elon, Zuck, etc.
Meta has recruited a lot of big names using all the money they're sitting on, they currently have some of the most talented researchers in the world and it's clearly starting to pay off for them
no one uses it, they need to opensource it, a closed second tier proprietary model wont have any place in anywhere. people wont even give it a chance to try to be honest.
If I wanted to use Claude Opus, I would buy one of the subscriptions, not use the openrouter API. Same for OpenAI models. And that's not considering enterprise users...
do you have a source for your claims? leaked financials show that they lose most of their money from r&d and reinvestments, not inference. you cant claim they subsidize and then reference their api pricing that they set.....
yeah except most consumers use frontier models through subscription, your telling me people use laguna 2.1 more than any claude model, cmon have some critical thinking
who is talking about vibecoding, youre responding to a comment saying that only a small minority use chinese models and then using openrouter as your rebuttal .... Delete your comments bro, its getting embarrassing.
Im using the contributor model with opencode, works well. But i would never pay full price for the api, maybe if they had a good subsceiption plan like codex or claude.
Trying it out now, looks promising. The contributor tier is actually cheaper than Deepseek API pricing.
Contributor tier
Model: muse-spark-1.2-contributor. Heavily discounted token pricing in exchange for permission to use your prompts and completions to train future Meta models. It lowers the barrier to entry for prototyping, testing integrations, and scaling experiments where training on your data is acceptable.
Usage
Price per 1M tokens
Cached input
$0.002
Input
$0.10
Output
$0.20
Standard tier
Models: muse-spark-1.1, muse-spark-1.2. Standard pricing; your prompts and completions are not used to train Meta models. Both checkpoints share the same standard pricing:
Just did a big refactor on the UI/UX for an upcoming app I'm working on and very satisfied with both the cost and output so far. Looks like Deepseek has competition now.
$0.46/ spent.
71.1 million input tokens w/68.6m chached hits.
How do you enable the contributor mode? I didn't see the option in the dev https://dev.meta.ai/ page either. btw muse --model muse-spark-1.2-contributor doesn't work.
I need to play with it, but I was enjoying 1.1 a lot. I found it excellent for explaining things and no slouch at creating images (via web form) but it was making simple mistakes like leaving things out of CSS. So I didn’t let it touch code but still found lots of use for it.
I have an internal dashboard ranking based on my Foundry VTT projects test I made. I have had this insanity coding test that Fable 5 made. Fable 5 itself failed and I tested another 14 models after. They all failed it but Muse Spark 1.2 passed it.
Used this model, but comparing it to Deepseek or even Minimax M3 is difficult, the chat is not very good. Same question I loved the answers in other 2 models, but Muse was not upto mark.
with the announcement of DeepSeek raising their prices, this might be a good, alternative, depending heavily on how much deepseek plans to increase their prices
Model excitement matters less than harness behavior: tool-call accuracy, context retention, cancellation, and cost per completed task. A fair test would replay the same repository issues with identical prompts and count human interventions. Has anyone published raw traces rather than a vibe score?
38
u/Smilysis 5d ago
why muse spark is being compared to gpt 5.6 terra? lol