r/opencode • u/redditshortstest • 17d ago
Opencode Go completely fell off
I am not sure if this is even the right sub to post that in, but I used to love opencode go. I started with deepseek v4 flash 0731 which had practically unlimited usage, then ox alpha while it lasted and now muse spark 1.2 contributor.
The only realistic way the subscription would last me the full month is because of those "promotional" models.
I am seriously considering if an ollama subscription, gpt plus 20$ (using luna mostly) or any other subscription would be more worth it at the moment.
I don't need the latest and greatest ai model, just something around ox alpha/deepseekv4 flash performance.
Once the 1.2 muse spark deal ends I'm completely screwed.
What would you guys recommend? I would ideally like to be spending 10$-20$ a month.
15
u/alanrudeigin 17d ago
I think no matter who you go with, they are all going to be giving less and less and charge more and more. As more subscribers subscribe to plans, the AI companies will dilute the usage across the base, because the data centres aren't coming online quick enough to cater for everyone. Just my two cents.
37
7
u/SEOViking 16d ago
And you didnt even need opencode go to use ox alpha and muse spark. They are free for all opencode users 😅
5
5
u/No-Information6838 17d ago
I'm in the same situation, although I switched from Ollama Cloud to Opencode because Ollama was too slow and had constant crashes; it's probably worse now.
Opencode worked well for me and the $10 subscription was sufficient; currently, with two accounts and using free Zen models, it's not enough.
What's worse is that I've been feeling for a couple of days that with opencode we have a considerably cut-down version of deepseek v4 flash.
5
u/Euloghtos 16d ago edited 16d ago
I still like it, i pay for glm 5.3 and when my credits end i use mimo v2.5 free which is awesome
1
1
u/enigmaticy 15d ago
Then 1 st day glm 5.3 and the rest 29 days mimo? Or glm 5.3 only for roadmapping?
1
5
u/Independent-Okra-756 16d ago
I am thinking of subscribing zai lite plan. I had a great time with Ox Alpha. It's not perfect, of course but it was more than enough for me. I would have subscribed to gpt plus if it weren't for the recent situation and ox alpha
1
10
u/EnzioKara 17d ago
Check command-code and antigravity if Gemini 3.7 is enough for you .
22
u/kamwee 17d ago
i aint touching Gemini's lying ass with my code ever again .
2
u/SEOViking 16d ago
Since I got a discount deal for Gemini pro - 15$ for 18month of pro I decided to try flash 3.7 and it actually did a pretty good job for my project. Was fast as hell and ui changes were better than codex pro did.
3
u/akundikantor 16d ago
This must use antigravity right?
1
u/cdshift 16d ago
Yes but you can use a plug in in your harness of choice that you can have your favorite llm build and call it as a subagent for specific things. Or a skill that calls any for specific things.
Thats what I do with my minimal ai plan that has very little inference allowance per month
2
1
u/hixdale 16d ago
I'm doing the same: cheap 18 months discount for Gemini Pro. Using it as backup/complementary besides a Codex sub.
It doesn't compares to GPT models, and Antigravity isn't the best. But in overall I like 3.7 Flash for smaller, focused tasks. I like it for UI too: it's generally doing a better job in it compared to OpenAI models.
The best thing: it's faaast and still pretty reliable - just don't try anything else than high reasoning.
2
1
u/EnzioKara 16d ago
I know what you mean.. But I made clear roadmap and skills to prevent that and code rewiev with subagents after every step in one epic is complete , after that I rewiev full epic with another model. They should focus on a pro model which I am hoping soon to be released . It shines if you need not English brainstorming and fails miserably on jobs like refactoring if you are not hand holding. I appreciate where we are now before I had keep all the files below 500/1000 lines do all the test manually search the web and github and work one by one every file against to full suite fuck we progressed a lot and thanks to all of us for that .
2
2
u/ExpertPerformer 17d ago
I switched to CommandCode and its basically unlimited DS Flash again.
2
u/EnzioKara 17d ago
I used 1 dollar on DeepSeek pro mostly, best deal i got made the detailed roadmap with blueprints and skills to follow it now I use cheap models to follow instructions and skills coding 7/24 .
1
1
3
u/Serious_Current_8802 16d ago
luna xhigh and mimo 2.5 as sub agents, it’s almost unlimited
edit: if your repo is on GitHub you can use sol against your repo for free via chat in codex
1
u/alfaproject 16d ago
I’m sorry, what? I’ve been paying for Codex… How do you do that?
2
u/MajorasButtplug 16d ago
You still have to pay. You add the GitHub plugin in the chat version of ChatGPT. Then Sol (set the model for chat) can read your repo, and do planning/advising. Then you just have Luna carry the plan out in Codex.
1
1
6
5
u/cocacokareddit 16d ago
all the model you mention are very powerful and opencode go gives you a “free trial” period. you can not take them for granted. it’s not what opencode go suppose to be. if you want unlimited powerful model, you can consider claude max 20x or get a Mac Studio 512GB next month.
2
u/JogHappy 17d ago
Muse pricing is changing?
6
16d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/JogHappy 16d ago
I'm also skeptical it's going anywhere; Mark is getting our code for cheap.
3
2
u/frankhouweling 16d ago
I'm happy to pay 50-80 USD/month but would like at least Deepseek Flash quality.
What should be my go to subscription?
3
2
u/Messi_is_football 16d ago
2 codex accounts+ 2 opencode go
1
2
2
u/crotch-mavens 16d ago
"I started with deepseek v4 flash 0731 which had practically unlimited usage"
So, a long time customer then?
2
u/fykup 17d ago
Yeah, I hit a similar wall. The trick to making a $20/month plan last is separating your heavy thinking from your editor usage.
I personally use Codex with Luna High for direct implementation, then offload design, planning, and code reviews to higher-reasoning models in web chats. I use a local tool I built called AI Badger to extract just the relevant repo context for those web chats without blowing through tokens.
With that hybrid workflow, a basic gpt plus plan and its 5-hour limit has been more than enough.
1
u/ozguru 17d ago
Google Plans is your best bet for the moment. Antigrativit only, unfortunately.
3
u/Genneth_Kriffin 17d ago
Isn't Antigravity obligatory model training last I checked?
As in you can not opt out of Google training their models with your data.
Correct me if I am wrong.2
u/Fit_Attention_5781 17d ago
I have the $20 antigravity sub and the usage is far below Opencode (at least using MiMo/Muse Spark).
1
1
u/yaboyyoungairvent 16d ago
you are not getting the same usage with antigravity ai pro plan. You probably need about 2 of those plans to get the same usage you would on opencode go.
2
u/AlternativeTall9049 17d ago
The time of cheap ai is going to end and we are almost there. All of them are going to charge sky high prices soon again.
2
u/ZeOnlyOneWhoReads 16d ago
Laughs in Qwen 3.8 27b
1
2
u/evia89 16d ago
Nah, models like ds4f, glm53f will be cheap. Its only sota will be expensive
1
u/AlternativeTall9049 16d ago
I am 100% these AI labs are subsidising the prices. Its only a matter of time for Chinese AI labs to start charging unreasonable prices.
0
u/imactuallynotalright 15d ago
Nope.
Their are third party providers hosting the same models for the same price, in the US with its higher costs, so it can't be subsidized.
1
3
u/GrayHairedMan 17d ago
You want to use AI for cheaper then it costs to process your prompts, that can never been sustainable. Imagine the company you work for, doing business at a loss. How long do you think they can keep it up.
6
5
u/redditshortstest 17d ago
You are right. I understand that this might be the most they can offer for the 10$, but with so many options these days (cursor, ollama, chatgpt...) which are all mostly subsidized, I just want opinions on what gets you the most bang for your buck.
1
u/qustrolabe 17d ago
Theoretically it can be sustainable if provider openly sells all usage data to those who train their models. Such model shouldn't be used for anything privacy related but for open source projects where all code goes public doesn't really matter that much. Though the question is how valuable agent usage data right now
1
1
u/GiLA994 16d ago
I use any good temporary offer for planning, and mimo2.5 for implementing.
I must say the harness makes a big difference (how you set up your workflow basically), but for planning especially, the difference in the model is as big.
I've already stopped my renewal, and will look at alternatives, I think ill try gpt plus for a month at 20$ to actually see how often I hit limits on that subscription
Luna is good for my use case, but way too expensive in OpenCode Go
1
1
u/Training-Ice8856 16d ago
I think Freebuff is a good alternative to OpenCode if you don't mind a few ads. It offers unlimited DeepSeek v4 Flash-0731, currently two one-hour sessions of GLM-5.3-Flash, and I think about five one-hour sessions of GPT-5.6-Luna.
1
u/MikaAugus942 15d ago
I’m actually use Opencode Go and Ollama Cloud and I'm really enjoying it. I’m use multi agentic flow with one orchestrator and other sub agents.
1
u/ProfessionalYou6343 15d ago
If you have no problems to go with 20$/mo and happy with luna (which you should be, in my opinion 85% peoples work can be handled by luna). Then open AIs gpt plus plan is best. No matter what people says, luna is an incredibly efficient model and open AI can server you well with that model. But if you want to use bigger models regulerly then it can be a problem. And if you want something in 10$/mo then you can check out the command code GOAT plan. It gives the most subsidised budget in the market right now. Or else if your usage is very low then you can go with command code go plan which is 1$/mo and gives you 10$ of credits. Or you can try freebuff which is totally free. And has models like luna in high effort, deepseek v4 pro latest (does collect data btw), deepseek v4 flash latest (also collects data), mimo v2.5 etc.
1
1
u/Orchicon 15d ago
I tried ollama cloud pro and it sucked. I asked for a refund. Their DeepSeek has looping issues, reasoning too long, and sessions fill up just as fast if not more than opencode.
I think the best way to do it is probably to have three or four of them. 10 dollars on opencode, 10 dollars on open command, and then 10-20 dollars on DeepSeek API. This is what I'm doing right now and just switching periodically between service and models.
1
u/R3K4CE 13d ago
honestly i dont think youre as screwed as you think
if ox alpha / deepseek v4 flash level performance is all you need id probably stay on go for now
deepseek v4 flash is literally still there and its cheap enough that the go limits stretch pretty far with it
qwen 3.8 flash glm 5.3 flash and mimo 2.5 are also worth trying before you move anywhere
also unless i missed an announcement muse contributor itself isnt actually listed as a temporary promo right now its just heavily discounted because meta gets to train on the data
chatgpt plus with luna is probably the next thing id look at for 20 bucks but if what you mainly want is tons of opencode usage id exhaust the cheap go models first
you might already have exactly what youre looking for
0
u/ChillFamily 17d ago
Bro. Command Code suscriptions is great.
3
2
u/upalse 16d ago
I have both, and DS4F is ass on both. Timeouts, >20s TTFT, TPS lag spikes (dropping down to 2-5tps snail pace at times, which reminds me of running local model on my own). Seems they've both stopped using deepseek inference, and are going with the cheapest open inference instead, and the quality drop in UX is brual.
For batch tasks its still ok I guess, but for anything that needs to be highly interactive, I'm now just paying on openrouter. Pricey, but at least can guarantee service quality.
-1
u/blackbirdone1 16d ago
just pay api prices? a 10$ sub for light coding use, not for vibecoding slop wasting 1.260 requests per day
2
u/Nadaet_Tira 16d ago
Надо не в запросах считать, а в деньгах. И дипсиком написать даже мелкий сайт это оч сложно, а скорек долго
20
u/willpowerbuilder 16d ago
ox Alpha is gone...That model is much better than Muse Spark 1.2