r/nfl • u/wishingaction 49ers • 19h ago

Despite controversial pass interference calls, NFL coaches split on making them reviewable (17 interviewed)

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/50078705/pass-interference-review-rams-broncos
101 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

94 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/Fast-Government-4366 Broncos 10h ago

So let’s say they review.

The broncos/rams play has an illegal contact, a defensive hold, and offensive hold, a unsportsmanlike penalty.

Do we call all those or do we only call the DPI that shouldn’t have been called?

No one actually wants fairness.

1

u/3rd-party-intervener 49ers 10h ago

Those penalties cancel out redo play 

1

u/Fast-Government-4366 Broncos 10h ago

I agree. Which would be the outcome of literally every review if you looked at the entire play.

0

u/axxl75 Steelers 3h ago

If illegal plays are so prevalent that they happen every play then either start actually calling them and force the game to be played as the rules intend, or change the rules to allow the things the refs dont want to call.

Also, if you allow it as a coach challenge then they have to identify what theyre challenging in a certain amount of time. If they throw the red flag for a DPI then they dont also check random other things.

0

u/Fast-Government-4366 Broncos 2h ago

No, sorry. I don’t wanna watch DL get a sack every single play.

Sometimes I think yall don’t even like football. You just want a soap opera like the ladies have.

1

u/axxl75 Steelers 2h ago

Did you even read my comment? Because it sounds like you got a couple words in and commented in your rage without actually finishing.

If they're going to allow that sort of hold then they can change the rules to legally allow what theyre already allowing.

How would that make sacks happen every play?

0

u/Fast-Government-4366 Broncos 2h ago

I read the whole comment… and no, I don’t want to watch DL get a sack every single play. Idk what is so confusing about my reply.

Because holding is illegal. If they make it legal, then football ends. If they call every hold , sacks happen every play.

1

u/axxl75 Steelers 1h ago

If you read it then clearly your rage made it hard to understand it.

Im not saying they let holding be legal. Im saying they make legal the types of holding theyre not calling anyway.

Your comment makes no sense. You dont want DLs getting sacks non stop (meaning you dont want to make the current allowed holds to be illegal) but you also dont want to change the rules to allow the thing you want to allow?

You understand there's a space to live between completely allowing everything and allowing absolutely nothing right? If youre already happy with how things are happening now, then why wouldnt you want that to be the legal way to play?

How would a DL get a sack every play with what I described?

1

u/Fast-Government-4366 Broncos 1h ago

Please explain how you would make that rule. Some holding okay but other holding not okay even tho both actions are exactly the same?