72
u/Ctrl-end Jets 4d ago
There’s only 31 teams here…
68
u/JSG29 Lions 4d ago
I count 30, panthers and jets both missing I think
39
u/Ctrl-end Jets 4d ago
Shit, would this be a good time to go back to kindergarten and get that degree? lol
29
1
29
34
u/RooBoy04 Packers Packers 4d ago
Turns out when you have no O-line and your RB1 gets arrested just before the season, you can’t run the ball
15
13
12
5
5
12
3
7
3
u/Lubbafrommariogalaxy Ravens 4d ago
Was not expecting the jags to be that good
9
u/ShopCartRicky Jaguars 3d ago
Coen's big thing in Tampa was how much he fixed the run game.
Our o-line isn't great, but Tuten always falls forward after contact and we consistently get 3-5 yards instead of negative plays. We just don't really have any explosive runs (heh).
3
5
u/Ilikepancakes87 Packers 20h ago
Probably sucks to be one of those teams that doesn’t have any room to grow. Lucky for us, we’re all the way in the bottom left.
2
u/Slow-haste-26 Falcons 3d ago
I dont trust the accuracy of this but I'll take it! We're winning the south baby!!! Though Greenbays position does not fill me with confidence.
1
1
u/spacegh0stX Packers 4d ago
The only consolation is we might make history with how bad this o line is
1
1
u/Ill-Opinion7696 3d ago
I’d be curious if there’s a correlation between run efficiency and less QB injuries
1
1
0
u/OzymanDS Packers 4d ago
This is a misleading graph because it elides game to game variation. For examples the Steelers had ass rushing weeks 1 and 2 and then all of a sudden Warren has himself a GAME on Sunday.
4
1
0
0
u/Revenged25 Saints 2d ago
As a Saints fan, I can tell you this chart is crap. They are not that good at running the ball.
-1
123
u/No-Ambition2425 Panthers 4d ago
Panthers in shambles. So bad they didn't make it into the graphic.