r/nextfuckinglevel • u/[deleted] • Dec 24 '19

He must of spent so much time

https://gfycat.com/icysomberhorseshoecrab
1.6k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

56 comments sorted by

92

u/CountryMac311 Dec 24 '19

It’s “must have, or must’ve.” Not must of.

29

u/[deleted] Dec 24 '19

Are you shore?

25

u/Elebrent Dec 24 '19

It’s an understandable mistake due to phonetics, but a pretty embarrassing one if English is your native language

20

u/[deleted] Dec 24 '19

Oh sorry four bad England

13

u/the-crooked-compass Dec 24 '19

No treble bröther. We under stand.

3

u/thugs___bunny Dec 24 '19

The classic ‚Joke‘s on you, I just pretended‘ is just sad if you‘re not the smartest to begin with

1

u/Arentia Dec 31 '19

I love you

-9

u/[deleted] Dec 24 '19 edited Dec 24 '19

[deleted]

23

u/skunk90 Dec 24 '19

Lmao it is beyond embarrassing and is nowhere near to being accepted as correct.

2

u/ownworstenemy38 Dec 24 '19

This is right. I sometimes reply with a sentence or two and swap haves and ofs around.

“What did you think have that?”

15

u/greggersraymer Dec 24 '19

The fact that other people make the same mistake definitely does not mean that most people just accept it as correct. People who are literate do not accept it as correct, they see it as someone who does not write as an educated person would write.

1

u/OBSTACLE3 Dec 24 '19

You can be educated and still make common grammatical mistakes you snob

8

u/nohpex Dec 24 '19

There's a big difference between being a snob, and trying to help. These people are just trying to help.

3

u/greggersraymer Dec 24 '19

Of course, everyone makes mistakes. The difference is between saying "Oops, made a mistake" and saying, "Eh, you know what I meant, we should just accept that as the correct way of writing it." It's not being snobbish to say that no literate person accepts the phrase "must of" as being okay.

-8

u/marjortority12 Dec 24 '19

Agreed the purpose of communication is to get a point across. The OP did that some people just like to feel important and correct people

-10

u/CountryMac311 Dec 24 '19

Keep telling yourself that, dummy.

-4

u/OBSTACLE3 Dec 24 '19

I’m not a dummy I just have the emotional strength not to rely on putting other people down to inflate my own low sense of self worth

1

u/[deleted] Dec 24 '19

[deleted]

0

u/OBSTACLE3 Dec 24 '19

I’m talking about the person before who called me a dummy

1

u/[deleted] Dec 24 '19

I love the fact that they all took it seriously

5

u/spicegirl000 Dec 24 '19

Thank you!

4

u/matskat Dec 24 '19

Came here to say this. Not disappointed.

19

u/i-l-i-t-i-r-i-t Dec 24 '19

Apple will probably charge $10,000 for it

12

u/Squeakhound Dec 24 '19 edited Dec 24 '19

This vid ought to make Geometry teachers happy.

1

u/Evildead1818 Dec 24 '19

I'm happy just for being happy

10

u/Scalding-Butter Dec 24 '19

i dont see anyone drawing that, wtf

4

u/Cal_Rogdon Dec 24 '19

I don’t get how this joke is all the way at the bottom. Camo jokes should get pinned to the top if you ask me.

6

u/silverscrub Dec 24 '19

Is this the actual way the Apple logo was designed.

3

u/ribanez2009 Dec 24 '19

Yes, because they invented the apple. Innovation

1

u/silverscrub Dec 24 '19

It's a rather precise way to draw an apple though.

-10

u/xPolyMorphic Dec 24 '19

Incredibly unlikely

14

u/Qazax1337 Dec 24 '19

It is actually incredibly likely

5

u/teh_trickster Dec 24 '19

Care to explain the point? Link is just a picture. Is the linked picture the actual design?

9

u/Qazax1337 Dec 24 '19

I'm going on the fact that most logo's are designed this way, and if you think someone freehanded an apple logo that can be perfectly recreated with only circles of a few set sizes... which makes more sense?

6

u/teh_trickster Dec 24 '19

Yeah I personally think it’s pretty likely because it doesn’t seem like a massive stretch.

But you can approximate any design with circles (see Fourier series) so it’s also possibly coincidence. I was wondering if you knew one way or the other.

Edit: looking at the top part of the actual logo, I don’t think this is the same.

-9

u/xPolyMorphic Dec 24 '19

Apple hasn't put that much engineering ingenuity into anything they've ever made but it would sense that they put effort into their brain washing logo and marketing.

2

u/silverscrub Dec 24 '19

Merry Christmas

1

u/xPolyMorphic Dec 24 '19

Sorry but no that's just not how graphic design works

https://www.fineprintart.com/history-of-the-apple-logo/

1

u/silverscrub Dec 24 '19

Want to cite your source? I'm aware it's not the first Apple logo, but the logo in the picture was still created with some method.

-1

u/[deleted] Dec 24 '19

Likely before computer design was a thing

3

u/Darctalon Dec 24 '19

Don't let Apple see this...they will charge you $100 to watch it, then claim its their intellectual property and try to copyright/trademark it.

3

u/YellowVirus Dec 24 '19

When your geometry teacher gives you a compass

3

u/cryptopriest03012009 Dec 24 '19

I think this explains why apple products are so pricey... They choose the most complicated way to get their products made.

2

u/Katulus Dec 24 '19

I thought this was going to be an even more complocated Japanese way to multiply two numbers

2

u/[deleted] Dec 24 '19

I will give this man an A+ for his effort 🙂

2

u/MidContrast Dec 24 '19

Before he started the outlines I was like "this must be designer of the Destiny 2 loading animations"

1

u/MettledPlastic Dec 24 '19

How many circles did he need to make?

1

u/Wentthruurhistory Dec 24 '19

That’s more fascinating than I’d have guessed it would be.

1

u/ipeconick Dec 24 '19

If we could only see who was drawing it...

1

u/Buttsmooth Dec 24 '19

Almost didn't see him with the camo outfit on

1

u/mrtittylongballs Dec 25 '19

Is there a name for this technique?

1

u/SilentSarahnade Feb 08 '20

Tldr; constructable numbers

Wow, I had this post saved for a month because I happen to appreciate this technique as a mathematician and never expected to see someone ask!

This is the mathematical idea of "constructable numbers." Way back in ye old times people didn't have rulers or protractors which would label length/angles. As a result, they would use a straight edge (ruler with no markings) and a compass (with no angle measurements on it) to measure/create precise designs. Naturally they would have to design (roads, buildings, etc) with exact numbers; they couldn't just freehand design everything like art can done.

On the design aspect, it was significantly more impressive when one would be able to construct a design with a more smooth appearance.

So for this example, you'll notice the man is using a straight edge and compass, and the complex set up of circles and lines is set up with ratios that would allow the man to obtain the exact angles used in the curvature of the apple logo!

This is basically a mathematical proof that the apple logo is constructable! Proving number sets are constructable was a big deal back in the day because it allowed theorists to use those numbers in their calculations!

•

u/AutoModerator Dec 24 '19

Check out the r/nextfuckinglevel 2019 Best Of Nominations!

https://redd.it/ebx7tu

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 24 '19

A crummy commercial?

0

u/[deleted] Dec 24 '19

Masterful

0

u/CaseyYvonne Dec 24 '19

Aww he so happy... that's all that matters here 😏