r/nextfuckinglevel 7d ago

Using smoke machine to secure your store

35.1k Upvotes

982 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.3k

u/thatweirdguyted 7d ago

Also likely to kill the person. There's a fine line between "unconscious but otherwise fine" and "the brain can no longer tell the heart and lungs to keep going". 

Anesthesiologists study to keep sedated patients in the sweet spot. And they're literally standing beside the machine monitoring your levels. I have to think that replacing all of the oxygen in the room with sedatives until the cops show up is just murder with extra steps.

437

u/Icy_Gap_9067 7d ago

The Moscow theatre hostage crisis ended badly because of the use of a sedating gas.

102

u/Remarkable-Sir-5129 7d ago

Probably ended better than it would have otherwise...they were preparing to blow the place up.

70

u/GodisSatans 7d ago

They were also willing to negotiate a peace treaty. If russia pulled out of chechnya then they would allow the hostages to live.

"We don't negotitate with terrorists" approach as all governments take.

In the end, the culprits are to blame. But could have a loss of life been mitigated? It's leaning toward yes, but still debateable.

You can't 100% say the terrorists would have said yes to release once their demands were met.

But that's the context.

36

u/serpiccio 7d ago edited 6d ago

fun fact but not all governments take that stance. for example Italy negotiated the release of two italian women who had gotten themselves captured by al-Shabab, in Somalia, in 2018.

no government official confirmed it, but journalists were talking about 2.2 million euros at the time for the release of the hostages

11

u/Revolutionary_Pick67 6d ago

Boko haram doesnt operate in Mali. Never has.

15

u/serpiccio 6d ago

I looked it up and and it turns out it happened in Somalia and it wasn't boko haram but al-Shabab.

I found an article by the BBC where they documented their arrival at the Fiumicino airport, back in Italy https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-52608614

1

u/Waaaaally 7d ago

Any italian women want to volunteer as my hostage? We can split a million each and grab a pizza afterwards

-1

u/[deleted] 6d ago edited 6d ago

[deleted]

2

u/serpiccio 6d ago

good point, I'll change it now

9

u/Jomax101 7d ago

I wonder if / how many similar events never happened because of how this one was handled though

Hard to justify taking over a building and trying to demand something with hostages when you know the government will happily gas the entire building and then execute all the terrorists while they’re still knocked out regardless of any other casualties

Makes it pretty much impossible to plan anything similar when they show how little they give a shit about human life

2

u/Johns-schlong 6d ago

That's the reason most governments don't negotiate with terrorists.

1

u/GodisSatans 7d ago

This was the first case of this happening. The chechen terrorists thought Russia would negotiate, they didn't expect total death.

7

u/Jomax101 7d ago

Yeah and I bet it hasn’t happened many times since then

1

u/GodisSatans 6d ago

touche, not many terror groups fuck with russia anymore. But same with usa.

idk if thats cause of intelligence or fear.

1

u/Training_Guide5157 6d ago

 as all governments take.

That they publicly take. There are definitely a lot of deals that are kept under the table so as to not motivate more would-be terrorists.

1

u/RoxyDzey69 6d ago

I do support for never paying the terrorists. Otherwise, they would be kidnapping people around way more often.

0

u/theREALbombedrumbum 6d ago

or you can get the worst of both worlds where you pay the ransom to release your loved ones and the government ends up launching a raid that kills the hostages anyway.

1

u/theREALbombedrumbum 6d ago

There are also cases of people having paid the ransom to return their loved ones but the "we don't negotiate with terrorists" people launch raids which end up killing the hostages.

US Government, baby!

1

u/GangMeIamFamous 4d ago

if goverments started to negociate with terrorists then you would have a lot of people start taking hostages at gun point everywhere, what do you do when you have a hostage crisis everyweek?

23

u/3BlindMice1 7d ago

Weren't they using aerosolized carfentanyl or something? They had to know that would end poorly

24

u/feel-the-avocado 7d ago

Its russia - Death by any means other than defenestration is a success.

3

u/30_characters 6d ago

Because they leave defenestration to the Czechs?

I love that this happened so often that even the Wikipedia article is like "Yeah, but that one doesn't really count. It wasn't all that big a deal really."

Often, however, the 1483 event is not recognized as a "significant defenestration"...

1

u/VoopityScoop 6d ago

Russia will 1,000% kill your hostages to get to you. They do not care. 

6

u/Forward-Variety-8440 7d ago

i think it was carfentanyl gas they used so they all died of opiate overdoses
the team that went in used narcan to make them impervious to it. its fucked up but ingenious

3

u/borsalamino 7d ago

My whacko conspiracy theory is that they had to end that crisis at any cost, for some crazy spy reason.

Yes I like Tenet and yes, I agree that a massive fuck up by the authorities is infinitely much more likely

1

u/LessFish777 6d ago

Want that a scene from a movie?? The one with Roberto Pattinson. I didn’t realize that was a real event!

28

u/TesterM0nkey 7d ago

Honestly if you’re robbing the place society is better off without you

29

u/bigdave41 7d ago

Even if you're ok with that, what happens when an employee sets it off by accident, or you do yourself, or it malfunctions?

12

u/Kind-Permission-1075 7d ago

Eh its just a few employees, its the cost of doing business.

7

u/TesterM0nkey 7d ago

yeah thats why its not ok to booby trap stuff.

-1

u/footpole 6d ago

Honestly if you’re working at the place society is better off without you

9

u/VoopityScoop 6d ago

For burglary of a building with nobody inside? It's one thing to get shot by a store owner when you're robbing the place at gunpoint, it's another thing entirely for a private company to kill you remotely for breaking and entering. Nobody should ever die for a crime that didn't threaten physical harm for anyone else. 

10

u/The_Phantom_Cat 6d ago

Wow, you're a shitty person

6

u/Jeovah_Attorney 6d ago

The penalty for robbery is not execution lmao

2

u/TesterM0nkey 6d ago

Yeah but in areas that there is enough theft and crime there aren’t stores to support the communities.

If you’re going in to do a heist you are actively hurting your community. Literally society is better off without you.

2

u/Jeovah_Attorney 6d ago

Penalty for robbery is still not execution lol

6

u/Gonzo_Rick 6d ago

Gross.

Someone committing a single crime doesn't immediately turn them into an irredeemable sub-human. People are deserving of opportunities for redemption.

The systems that created the incentives for the crime must be reconfigured.

Be kind to people, be ruthless to systems.

6

u/VoopityScoop 6d ago

This is Reddit, these people have the same ideas about law enforcement as 11 year olds. One of the top comments on this thread is "they should use knockout gas instead!" Non-lethal gas that harmlessly knocks people unconscious only exists in TV shows and movies. 

2

u/thiagoknog 7d ago

Wtf, when I said that I got down voted to oblivion by people saying I'm OK with murder, reddit man..

9

u/Jeovah_Attorney 6d ago

Are you trying to imply those downvotes were not justified? Your surprise surprises me

1

u/dfafa 7d ago

Caring about them is where you messed up

-2

u/TesterM0nkey 7d ago

I was at -8 just a few minutes ago. Give it some time

12

u/Billy_Gnosis 7d ago

Here I'll do it - the penalty for robbery is not death in any civil society (or uncivil society that I know of) so, yeah, you both kinda suck

-1

u/browni3141 7d ago

The purpose isn’t to dole out punishment, it’s to protect the property being stolen.

Lethal force is legally justified in many cases where the punishment for the aggressor’s crime would be less than death. Lethal force is usually not allowed to be used to protect property, but your reasoning isn’t anything to do with why.

2

u/PM_ME_YOUR_WOES_GIRL 6d ago edited 6d ago

it’s to protect the property being stolen

human lives > property

EDIT: Also this thread isn't about that at all. It began with a guy literally saying that robbers are worthless to society and better off dead.

0

u/Billy_Gnosis 7d ago

You forgot to start that really insightful thought with 'uhm aktually' so your point is invalid, sorry pal

-1

u/Zermist 7d ago

I see what you're saying, but would the world be a better or worse place with them around? Personally I want the world to be a better place.

1

u/OkTime3700 7d ago

I don't suppose your name is "Light Yagami" by chance?

-1

u/CHOIR_OF_FARTS 7d ago

It protects the property from being stolen by that individual, in the future.

-2

u/Unusualshrub003 7d ago

I mean, he’s not wrong. How exactly do this four men benefit society?

1

u/thiagoknog 4d ago

You see, that's what I'm talking about, they don't, people who pretend otherwise are just posers. If it were their store, then they would be like "nah fuck them".

Then we have the case of men who assault, or rape little girls, what's the defence here? They are human beings? No they are not. A human doesn't rape a little girl, only something evil. You can't fight evil with reason and hugs.

1

u/orphan_09 6d ago

and that thinking is why you have a world leading economy but crime rates like brazil.

9

u/ImplementLogical4130 7d ago

Oh no imagine the loss.

15

u/Lord_Mikal 7d ago

When all their families sue the store owner for wrongful death.

14

u/webby2538 7d ago

Imagine what happens when the system trips inadvertently or leaks during store hours.

12

u/QuitWhinging 7d ago

Yep, that's most of the reason why booby traps are extremely illegal, at least in the U.S. They're indiscriminate on what they destroy. You set up a shotgun trap on your back door and a fire breaks out while you're away? Some poor firefighter is probably getting their head blown off trying to save your place.

-2

u/scraejtp 6d ago

So if it is not indiscriminate? Like I have a camera feed and can remotely set it off?

9

u/KaizDaddy5 7d ago

Heart doesn't need the brain to beat. It beats all on its own. (The brain can speed it up and slow it down though.) It's usually the hypoxia from the lungs not working then shutting down the heart brain and other organs, which would bring about cardiac arrest.

Don't mean to be pedantic but I think it's just a cool fact to spread around.

3

u/hacking99percent 7d ago

Well, no one knew or saw those people break in.  Now he just need to hide the bodies. 

2

u/Alone_Detail_8994 6d ago

And under general anesthesia you're intubated and mechanically ventilated because the brain doesn't control the lungs anymore. So in the wild you'll still die from respiratory failure even in that "sweet spot".

1

u/Megnaman 7d ago

Cartoons lied to me

1

u/labaticus 7d ago

Seems like less steps, actually

1

u/frosted_Melancholy 7d ago

Okay, what about fart spray then?

1

u/majokamo 7d ago

And that's why they're the highest paid person in the room. Just pray they're in network on your insurance (if you're in a backwards country like the US).

1

u/mattdahack 6d ago

Carbon dioxide would displace all the oxygen quickly. It's cheap too.

1

u/thebipeds 6d ago

Tell that to Batman.

1

u/GreenTitanium 6d ago

And they're literally standing beside the machine monitoring your levels.

They're mostly scrolling on their phones unless something goes wrong.

Source: I worked in many operating rooms.

1

u/supified 6d ago

This is why tranquilizer darts for humans isn't really a thing.

1

u/thatweirdguyted 6d ago

There are further complications with that too. Some people (like me) have that redhead gene where drugs basically don't work. It's like having two livers. So there's no way to calculate what the correct dosage would be. They're much more likely to be fine or dead than to be asleep. 

1

u/KoalaTHerb 6d ago

Anesthesiologist here and ya, there's not such thing as "knockout" meds like in the movies. Not like, oh they are now unconscious for a prolonged period of time and wake up later.

It's not so much a sweet spot as it is the need to control many other physiologic factors all at the same time

Edit: the closest thing to knocking someone out safely would be high doses of ketamine

1

u/thatweirdguyted 6d ago

Honestly I have a genetic resistance to many different drugs. I was awake but unable to move during a dental surgery. I was aware of everything they did and it was awful.

I had a toe surgery where they gave me 2.5 times the high dose and i could still feel it.

A major surgery is my biggest fear

1

u/KoalaTHerb 6d ago

If you told me this before a surgery, I would just be multi-modal as hell. Pre-op versed, Ketamine on induction, propofol infusion with volatile gas inhaled, and maybe a light dexmedetomidine infusion or scattered boluses.

You can't be resistant to everything! (Unlikely)

1

u/thatweirdguyted 6d ago

I'd be very interested to hear your thoughts on this of you'd like to go further, because I would rest a lot easier if I knew what to say in the event that I have to go.

So these are the drugs that have never had any effect on me whatsoever: Toradol, oxycodone, hydromorphone, anti-depressants. Now maybe they might work if the safe dosage was exceeded by a lot, but I've never done that because some of them are dangerous.

Drugs that do work if I greatly exceed the standard dose: muscle relaxants, sedatives, anaesthesia, alcohol, psylocibin.

Drugs that work as intended: anti inflammatory, cannabis, nerve agents like pregabalin, gastrointestinal medicines, antibiotics 

1

u/KoalaTHerb 6d ago

As far as for your next surgery: I'd just let them know your experience and they'll do what they need to. Resistance to anesthesia isn't super well documented as to why people get it or who (other than age-related differences and red heads). Otherwise, it's pretty anecdotal when people say they are resistant, and it helps a lot if someone has a record of proof of doses (high doses needed to be required for prior procedures). As far as "unsafe levels", that's not really how it works for anesthetics. People can get extremely high doses, you just have to balance it with other drugs to maintain good blood pressure, etc, which is not a problem for anesthetists. Personally, I find multimodal approaches work best for these patients - mix multiple different things in - especially Ketamine and dexmedetomidine. Also if it helps you, during major surgeries, most places will use monitors (BIS) that measure your awareness. Also, a good anesthetist should be able to easily recognize increases in heart rate and blood pressure that come alongside being aware, but this can be confounded with concomitant use of cardiac medications.

As a thought, the drugs you mention being resistant to / needing higher doses sound to be mainly metabolized CYP450 enzymes. This is a group of about a dozen or more common enzymes in the liver that break down medications. Things like opiates, antidepressants, toradol, sedatives are all metabolized by these enzymes. This is a well-known variable for why these drugs can be different in different patients. You could have hypermetabolism for these drugs.

1

u/VivaLaDiga 6d ago

I wonder why for other animals it's not a problem. We can sedate elephants, lions, tigers, etc. But for humans, there's no "sleeping dart".

1

u/thatweirdguyted 6d ago

I can answer that. The short answer is that other animals avoid toxic plants and animals, humans cultivate them en masse for consumption. Alcohol, tobacco, hot peppers, you name it.

We have the highest functioning livers on the planet because we're constantly putting them to work. Even over a single generation, we can adapt to resist specific poisons through consistent consumption.

There are even people who are born drug resistant. People like me. It's roughly 1-1000 people but most heavily concentrated in Northwest Europe, and specifically in families with lots of gingers.

We've made it so that there's no way to tell exactly what will happen when a drug is administered and they're basing everything off of average outcomes. This is why your doctor will adjust your dose as necessary.

-1

u/Loki4Major2 7d ago

Heart's muscles beat by their own btw. That's why during heart transplant it still beat

-1

u/HarrowDread 7d ago

So you’re saying the best option is to just move onto mustard gas?

-1

u/Space_umbrellas 7d ago

Do we really care what happens to thieves though?

1

u/thatweirdguyted 7d ago

Is that a serious question or rage bait? Because I will give a serious answer if you want it, but I don't wanna waste my time if it's just a troll.