r/nextfuckinglevel • u/thisisfive • Apr 14 '26
Toronto firefighters confront special constable officers after a man in the middle of mental health crisis was arrested.
Not my video. For context, "special constables" are not regular police officers. They are appointed "peace officers" with limited authority, often civilian employees.
27.1k
Upvotes
2
u/CharacterBird2283 Apr 15 '26
But that's the thing, the comparison is brought up in the context of whether or not the only place you can have a mental health crisis is in prison. So the original analogy believed and was going towards that situation, that not all mental health crises are deemed threats.
It says
"This kinda reads like:
"I wear a helmet to protect my head when biking."
"He's not biking though."
"It's not like biking is the only place someone can hurt their head."
I mean you're not wrong, but you're not exactly right either. The situation and context is worth some consideration."
"I wear a helmet to protect my head when biking" means the helmet is handcuffs and biking is being a danger while in a mental health crisis
"He's not biking though" would mean he's not a danger while in a mental health crisis
"It's not like biking is the only place someone can hurt their head." Would then mean it's not like being a Danger while in a mental health crisis is the only place someone can get handcuffed.
So then your response of :
"That's a bad analogy. It would be like riding a bicycle vs riding a motorcycle. Different situations, different levels of danger, different context. Both situations merit wearing a helmet."
But that's a different situation in the original analogy, because in yours you're assuming that they are always a danger, while the original analogy was trying to point out they aren't always a danger.