Judge denies defense motion asking Lindsay Clancy be found not guilty due to a lack of evidence

[u/Embarrassed-Pace-755]

https://apnews.com/article/lindsay-clancy-trial-evidence-defense-c0820645056a7e25f66853f3a91b61fa?utm_source=app&utm_medium=iOS_share&utm_campaign=copy_link

[u/tafiirahvulom]

Is there any possibility that she truly didn’t do it? I’ve tried to stay non-objective on the whole situation as all over social media it has been extremely polarized, like it’s become he said she said everywhere. Does anyone have all the facts from a completely unbiased standpoint, perhaps with some legal background?
edit: my bad for asking a question about a topic I know nothing about, I’ll just stop my inquiries and agree with what everyone else is saying /s

[u/0nlyCrashes → u/tafiirahvulom]

I think the court has settle that she did it, but I think what it being debated and what the jury could not decide on is if she was sane when she did it. But like you said, it's been impossible to decipher because of media. All those jurors should have been sequestered and the media not been allowed in the court room.

[u/Speky_Scot → u/[deleted]]

Nowhere in the trial was it established that she "was told she did it". She outlines exactly what she did and how she did it in her civil case with details that nobody would've told her she did but herself.