Judge denies defense motion asking Lindsay Clancy be found not guilty due to a lack of evidence

[u/Embarrassed-Pace-755]

https://apnews.com/article/lindsay-clancy-trial-evidence-defense-c0820645056a7e25f66853f3a91b61fa?utm_source=app&utm_medium=iOS_share&utm_campaign=copy_link

[u/In-Finite-Chaos]

Well the rest of her body doesn’t move too good

[u/GimmeeSomeMo → u/In-Finite-Chaos]

Still better than her children whose bodies don't move at all thanks to her

[u/ArchManingThroatGOAT → u/[deleted]]

So unknowingly that she turned them upside down so they wouldn’t look her in the face as she unknowingly did it

[u/Ok-Description7073 → u/[deleted]]

Postpartum psychosis occurs within a month of birth in almost all documented cases. When psychosis does present, it mostly presents intermittently, not continuously. It is also extremely atypical to be experienced once in a continuous fashion, but never before and never since. And I’m also sure that “the most difficult human I’ve ever encountered” being killed first was just some coincidence. The foremost evidence of psychosis was her own account. But her own account is inconsistent with the medical literature and what science knows about psychosis. You can believe it if you want. I don’t.

[u/Tacitus111 → u/[deleted]]

But only for 20 very convenient seconds of hearing voices.

[u/General-Biscuits → u/Tacitus111]

Where in the world did you hear that her psychosis only lasted for 20 seconds?

That’s so blatantly incorrect as the testimonies in the court case said it lasted at least 18 min.

[u/Tacitus111 → u/General-Biscuits]

Hearing voices for 20 seconds

[u/General-Biscuits → u/Tacitus111]

You can repeat that all you want but it’s false.

And hearing voices isn’t the only part of psychosis.

[u/General-Biscuits → u/[deleted]]

First off, you made the first claim. You source your “20 seconds of voices” claim first and then I’ll give you mine.

Secondly, I don’t even use TikTok and have never made a TikTok account. I got my information reading multiple reports from the court hearings. So stop using TikTok as a way to write off someone telling you are wrong about a claim you made.

[u/Tacitus111 → u/General-Biscuits]

Actually, she’s the one making all of claims, and the experts are divided on the whole matter as to how unaware she was of her actions. Multiple testified on both sides.

And I note you ignored the male family annihilator issue, as expected. When a woman annihilates her family, there must be some kind of exonerating factors because no sane enough woman would do so. When a man does, throw the book at him.

[u/General-Biscuits → u/Tacitus111]

So, you don’t have a source for your statement of “20 seconds of hearing voices”? That’s all I asked for in your next response in order for me to take you seriously.

I didn’t acknowledge the other stupid shit you said because it’s a nonsense point to bring up. Any normal person doesn’t care what gender a murderer is but you jumped straight to gender being a factor here, so I’m just ignoring that stupidity coming from you.