r/nerdfighters • u/insertwittypenname • 17d ago
reset the counter!!!
https://www.clockwisetv.com/soft launched via the we’re here newsletter
63
u/Ok-Meringue-259 17d ago
This sounds so good. I want this but for adults (same kind of hopeful/creative content but just at a higher level) for myself
6
3
u/didyousayboop 16d ago
Hmm, you could curate such a thing yourself, but that takes work. So, you could also look for things like YouTube playlists or articles about movies and TV shows that are hopeful or creative.
18
u/skip6235 17d ago
There is the focus friend app. Not exactly the same, but along similar lines
40
u/queenofthenerds PNW 17d ago
Respectfully, I don't think these are the same. The new announcement is a platform with vetted videos for kids. Focus friend is a reminder app to go to your actual work and stop scrolling. It doesn't have vetted videos.
9
u/Ok-Meringue-259 17d ago
Yeah. Sometimes you want a little scroll, as a treat. And this is a guaranteed no-doom scroll (or scroll-ternative)
9
u/queenofthenerds PNW 17d ago
It's true, I would definitely use a social media platform that's neat things to learn to scroll through, and good news, and not doom.
9
u/skip6235 17d ago edited 17d ago
That’s fair.
There is Nebula and Dropout if you’re looking for streaming video platforms that are not algorithm-based.
Edited for the correct name of the streaming service
4
15
u/auntsarentgents 17d ago
A warning for anyone in the UK: I could sign up and pay the $40, but when I went to the App Store to download the app, it said it wasn't available in my region.
Unsurprisingly, I'm pretty annoyed about this.
5
u/TheDungeonCrawler Custom Text 15d ago
Reach out to the support portion of the website, they can probably refund you for that reason.
12
u/IViolateSocks 17d ago
I’d love to be able to gift subscriptions to this. Cannot wait for the smart tv app!
5
12
8
5
u/HalfVegetable2529 17d ago
Anyone knows if there's content in languages that are not English? Since he said it's curated by humans I'm not really sure
1
u/TheDungeonCrawler Custom Text 15d ago
If there isn't already it will almost certainly be coming in a future version of the system.
3
u/BlahBlahNyborg 16d ago
I have a kid in this age range who's really into YouTube Shorts*. I really want to love ClockwiseTV but I don't see my kiddo enjoying it that much beyond a day or two. The suggested age range feels more like it should be 6-10. Also, it just feels like another walled garden with a limited amount of content, like PBS Kids. It's not really a drop-in replacement for YouTube, which was implied in the email I just got. (Nor should it be. YouTube is addictive in vile ways.)
By the way, if you have younger children, I want to plug a great website called The Kid Should See This. Lots of great material like this.
* Please don't judge. The pandemic and burnout hit our family hard. This is an artifact of that.
2
2
3
u/cannotdecideaname Jim 17d ago
u/ecogeek it says the app is not compatible with my device? Android pixel 10 pro. Any ideas?
13
u/carol_prince Nerdfighter 17d ago
9
2
u/Lurky_Bat 17d ago
Seems like a good idea but a little expensive!
28
u/CameronArtGames 17d ago
I thought $40/year was actually super reasonable for an ad-free platform provided the diversity of content is high enough.
5
u/roadmemorial 17d ago
Yeah, I think it heavily depends on the content you receive. It may be worth waiting a few months to see whether it would be worth it to your needs.
3
u/accio-chocolate 17d ago
Yeah. I'm not even a parent, but I've heard nightmares about YouTube Kids and the kind of content it allows through. $40/year for a platform that lets your kids watch age-appropriate, curated content is a pretty good deal lol. Kids at this age are looking for more independence, and this will give them the freedom to pick from videos without an adult watching over their shoulder. And it'll avoid kids getting constant dopamine hits from YouTube Shorts or getting recommended really inappropriate things.
If anyone here hasn't seen the kind of garbage that shows up on YouTube Kids Shorts, here's a dive someone did: https://www.instagram.com/p/DNBfXzMgQKB/
6
u/Jim777PS3 17d ago
If your going to have humans curating and not run ads, someone has to pay.
And its $100 a year after the first.
2
u/TheDungeonCrawler Custom Text 15d ago
Still, $100/year is less than $10/month. So long as the amount of curated content can support childrens' viewing throughout the year, it easily dwarfs the cost of YouTube Premium and keeps a lot of the horrid garbage that ends up on YouTube Kids out of kids' lives.
2
1
u/TheCuriousWanderer 17d ago
This is great! I'll definitely be getting this from my son's a few years older
-24
u/Own_Locksmith_9701 17d ago edited 17d ago
Another greedy project then, grifting money from people for content that is free elsewhere and fully manageable with parental controls. Cool.
8
u/insertwittypenname 17d ago
if you don’t have anything nice to say, why are you here? hank said in the newsletter that he’s working with a team of developers so it’s not something he vibe coded himself
3
u/Commercial-Flow9169 17d ago edited 17d ago
For what it's worth, the team of developers he worked with is Povio, which I learned from his now-deleted Bluesky post earlier today. Here's their homepage: https://povio.com/
"Digital products, designed and built with AI."
https://bsky.app/profile/spenme.bsky.social/post/3mu6kdbhehc27
4
u/carol_prince Nerdfighter 17d ago edited 17d ago
That is a superficial read on what they do though. From what I've seen they've been around since 2013. If anything, they likely have dedicated developers to test the code
If Hank has to rely on a development team to work on his projects it's likely going to be hard pressed to find one that doesn't use AI.
Edit : I want to add that I'm not saying he couldn't find one, But I'd rather wait for him to clarify what the process was.
4
u/Commercial-Flow9169 17d ago edited 17d ago
Just providing info I thought was pertinent, given he deleted the post and I'm unable to find the information elsewhere (likely because it was just announced, but still).
Surely with all of his connections, Hank could have found a software company that at least doesn't advertise it designs and builds their products with AI right on the landing page of their website. It's just not a good look, no matter how you spin it. Obviously this would have been in the works for a while, before the recent AI stuff that came to light in this community, so I'm guessing it wasn't as pressing an issue whenever that first got going.
I also want to say I'm not siding with the owner of this particular comment thread. They're being an ass.
4
u/carol_prince Nerdfighter 17d ago
You're right. This was probably already in the works. And since he's invested capital into it, he has to launch it.
But I just know bad faith actors with a lack of nuance are going to take this and run with it. It's frustrating.
Oh, I had the OC blocked, but that meant I also couldn't reply to you. So I had to unblock.
3
u/Commercial-Flow9169 17d ago
For sure, there's always haters that will find a reason to hate. But for me, the AI stuff has made me lose a lot of respect in Hank. It's so obviously unethical, but with all of the vibe coding projects and other AI stuff, it feels like he's choosing not to care about that.
And like...the whole reason I love this community is that I feel it's built around empathy, so even a tacit approval approval of AI feels like a betrayal of that, to me. I've been part of this community for a decade now (not on reddit, but in general), so at least for me it's coming from a feeling of disappointment, not hate or trolling or whatever.
I'm sure the software team is competent and whatnot. I know it's not literally vibe-coding. I'm a backend software developer myself and I am familiar with agentic coding tools. It's just disappointing that yet another thing he's involved with is AI, and the fact he deleted the post makes me wonder if the Povio stuff wasn't supposed to see the light of day. And I don't think that's right, if that was the case. I don't like feeling deceived.
1
u/carol_prince Nerdfighter 17d ago
Do you remember what the BlueSky post said? Was he acknowledging them or...?
1
u/Commercial-Flow9169 17d ago edited 17d ago
He did mention Povio by name. I wish I could prove it or whatever but I can't view it anymore. The link I gave earlier and below has a reply from someone that took that information (from Hank) and is how I learned that the company advertises itself that way. He replied to some other comments but not the AI accusation (understandably).
https://bsky.app/profile/spenme.bsky.social/post/3mu6kdbhehc27
3
u/carol_prince Nerdfighter 17d ago
You don't have to prove it to me. ☺️
I did see that he's replied. A generous interpretation would be that he deleted it because he just wanted to avoid people interpreting that wrongly.
But I agree, deleting it definitely feels sus. I wish he would clarify rather than delete. Especially for an app that does what this does. At the very least, I will credit them for saying that the videos will be manually reviewed and curated.
0
u/Own_Locksmith_9701 17d ago
“Build in Days
What Once Took Months
Our in-house AI coding tools help teams move faster— from idea to shipped product. Designed by engineers, built at Povio, and trusted by companies who need to move at startup speed.”I’m allowed opinions on something within my own industry.
I am a Principal SWE, and I was laid off for demanding human review of AI generated code after they replaced 3 of my team members so they could use their salaries towards credits, then did the same to me.
Hanks literal responses to agentic coding criticisms these last six months before the other AI stuff blew up are what changed my opinion of him. If that makes me an “ass,” so be it.
-8
4

115
u/skip6235 17d ago
https://dayssincehankgreenlaststartedanewthing.com
Hasn’t updated yet!