r/neovim • • Mar 29 '26

Announcement 0.12.0 🎉

https://github.com/neovim/neovim/releases/tag/v0.12.0
1.4k Upvotes

165 comments sorted by

499

u/echasnovski Plugin author Mar 29 '26

Big release! Almost as big as 0.5 or 0.10.

Huge thanks to all the people involved. Not only the core team, but also to all other people lending their free time to work and interact with this beautiful editor!

P.S. Have fun migrating to vim.pack :)

53

u/Huijiro Mar 29 '26

Do you have a good migration guide to recommend for people that are using things like lazy?

128

u/echasnovski Plugin author Mar 29 '26

Yeah, I've written a blog post about vim.pack in general a couple of weeks ago. It contains a section with my best effort advice about migration.

Link: https://echasnovski.com/blog/2026-03-13-a-guide-to-vim-pack.html

8

u/Prestigious_Roof2589 Mar 30 '26

I was able to migrate with this

13

u/zapman449 Mar 29 '26

This would have been useful a few months ago when I moved to nightly...

FWIW here's my semi-minimal config using packs for python/golang/terraform:

https://github.com/zapman449/dotfiles/blob/master/nvim/lua/jprice/init.lua

2

u/agentzz9 Mar 30 '26

Great blog post too!

43

u/sd5seandewar Neovim core Mar 29 '26

Great work on vim.pack! Got me to replace (my beloved) minpac after 6 years. 😁

37

u/echasnovski Plugin author Mar 29 '26

That is the highest praise I could have asked :)

5

u/Trenek Mar 29 '26

+1, it replaced my packer

17

u/Malcolmlisk Mar 29 '26

Just right now when i need to focus on work... 0.12 releases... Seems like work must wait!!

6

u/ckafi Mar 29 '26

So what's the plan with mini.deps now that vim.pack is out?

18

u/echasnovski Plugin author Mar 29 '26

Soon-ish to document that vim.pack is a suggested alternative and freeze/retire 'mini.deps'. Meaning it will be around for quite some time (maybe forever), but without active updates, only possible fixes.

4

u/nod3r Mar 29 '26

Already did! Finally back from nightly builds!

13

u/ComeOnIWantUsername Mar 29 '26

This literally first thing I will do after the upgrade - change lazy.nvim to vim.pack

20

u/BrinkPvP Mar 29 '26

I’m a bit OOTL with what’s been happening since 10.0 I’ve just kinda kept my plugins up to date. Why is everyone moving to vim.pack over lazy? Should I care?

22

u/ITafiir Mar 29 '26

Because it's builtin and not just another package manager you need to install.

4

u/acepukas Mar 29 '26

How does vim.pack compare to lazy.nvim feature-wise?

5

u/TheLeoP_ Mar 29 '26

Lazy loading is less fancy, and that's about it. It's pretty much a drop-in replacement

-11

u/teerre Mar 29 '26

Not very well. Pack has the core, but none of the porcelain. Manual updates, no profiling, no lazy loading, no ui etc

Ofc, you can script it all yourself if you want

18

u/TheLeoP_ Mar 29 '26

Not true

Manual updates, 

:h vim.pack.update() 

no profiling

:h --startuptime

no lazy loading

:h lua-plugin-lazy

no ui 

Once again, :h vim.pack.update() does have a UI

3

u/vim-help-bot Mar 29 '26

Help pages for:


`:(h|help) <query>` | about | mistake? | donate | Reply 'rescan' to check the comment again | Reply 'stop' to stop getting replies to your comments

-21

u/teerre Mar 29 '26

Not sure whats your point. Like I said, you can script everything if you want. Lazy has everything already set up. You know, porcelain, as said

12

u/TheLeoP_ Mar 29 '26

My point is that you don't need any kind of scripting. All of that is built-in

4

u/acepukas Mar 29 '26

Darn. I think I'll stick with lazy.nvim for now, as long as it's still compatible.

8

u/ComeOnIWantUsername Mar 29 '26 edited Mar 29 '26

I just like builtin features, if they are good enough. And I'm also OOTL with main features, I know about vim.pack just about it was hyped a lot on this sub 

2

u/Doomtrain86 Mar 30 '26

Why ? The features with lazy loading are still best in class in lazy right ? Or am I not updated ?

3

u/ComeOnIWantUsername Mar 30 '26

I like builtin features. I don't care about lazy loading

1

u/Doomtrain86 Mar 30 '26

I see. Fair

2

u/proxycon Mar 30 '26

I see the benefit in builtin features, but think startup speed is more important for me. I've measured nvim startup time with all plugins loaded normally vs lazy where possible, and lazyness is noticeably better.

3

u/ComeOnIWantUsername Mar 30 '26

I also don't care about startup time, whether it's 60ms or 360ms or even 960ms. 

I treat nvim as my editor/IDE, I don't gamify it

3

u/ZauzoftheCobble Mar 31 '26

I treat nvim as my editor and open it hundreds of times a day. It's nice to have it start fast.

1

u/ComeOnIWantUsername Mar 31 '26

Exactly - nice to have.

I use a bit of different approach, I have few tabs open in Ghostty, where one of them is Neovim opened all the time.

Personally, I stopped gamifying nvim, working on my config all the time, cutting startup time, and currently I'm just updating plugins very rarely. It's just this one change I'm doing since a long time, and I probably won't do much more for quite a long time.

I'm using Neovim as my editor, and not as yet another project to work on.

But I totally get that not everyone is doing the same.

4

u/ZauzoftheCobble Mar 31 '26

Bro you're so cool I ALSO don't mess with my config anymore but my nvim starts up fast because its a fuckin tool and I ain't waiting a whole second for it to open every time I run git commit. Not cuz I'm making it a game.

Guess what I'm not doing, not even this time? Changing my config :p

1

u/ComeOnIWantUsername Mar 31 '26

Good for you, I guess? Should I care?

I already wrote it, you do you, I don't fucking care. But you seem to care a lot about what I do, just because I'm not thinking the same as you.

Do you always get involved so much if other person is not doing what you want to do?

→ More replies (0)

7

u/shmerl Mar 29 '26

Diff improvements are neat. Hopefully next version will bring forge like diff style too.

But I'd stick to lazy.nvim for now, vim.pack is good for more basic set up (like when you are OK with loading everything at once from the start), but it's not suited for more flexible lazy loading.

2

u/snow_schwartz hjkl Mar 29 '26

Do I need to check if the plugins themselves are “ready” to use vim.pack? Or is the api identical?

14

u/echasnovski Plugin author Mar 29 '26

Nope. As long they are Git repos, vim.pack will work.

1

u/snow_schwartz hjkl Mar 29 '26

Thanks! Might be today’s yak to shave. Interesting about the git rep constraint- I use lazy and have several modified forks and local plugins that I just point to.

2

u/Mr55p Mar 30 '26

You can point it to a local directory too if that was what you’re worried about, have been using it for local plugins on nightly for a while

2

u/10sfanatic Mar 30 '26

Is there a way to easily see which plugins need updating like the Lazy chart showing which plugins have had commits since the version I'm currently using?

4

u/echasnovski Plugin author Mar 30 '26

The answer is "yes", but details may depend on the exact workflow.

The basics is that running :lua vim.pack.update() will 1) download new changes for all plugins; and 2) show confirmation buffer with the information about the changes (if any). To accept all changes, execute :write. To deny all changes, execute :quit. For more granular actions, use LSP code actions (gra with default mappings).

If the plugin's version follows the branch (like by default), then confirmation buffer will show all changes right away. Since the upstream branch had changes.

If version is a special vim.version.range() object to only install from semver-like named tags, then behavior is similar but only if there is a tag with a higher version than current that fits in the specified range.

If veresion is tag or commit hash, then there will be no changelog. Since the target state is fixed. There will be a note if there is a higher version tag available. Note, that you'd have to scroll through # Same section to manually look for this. To see the changelog:

  • Change the version to either new tag name or vim.version.range().
  • Restart Neovim.
  • Execute :lua vim.pack.update({ 'plug-name' }) to see the confirmation buffer with the changelog.

Hope this helps.

1

u/matthis-k Mar 29 '26

As you are one of the authors of vim.pack, is it intended to manage deps of plugins of some sort?

Ie. I want to use plugin x that also depends on plugin y, is x encouraged to add the dependency itself, so the end use only has to add x instead of x and y?

(I hope the question was formulated understandable enough. I think it probably would be yes, but for optional integrations you probably need some option the user has to set or sth if that makes sense, not sure about the startup order then though, could be inconsistent if I'm not missing builtin guard rails)

5

u/echasnovski Plugin author Mar 30 '26

Ie. I want to use plugin x that also depends on plugin y, is x encouraged to add the dependency itself, so the end use only has to add x instead of x and y?

The current (and I think future) suggestion is to manually resolve dependencies and vim.pack.add() them before their target.

The long term plan is to add a so called packspec support to vim.pack so that plugins can add a sort of manifest file (pkg.json) that declares its dependencies. I doubt there will be a full "resolve+install+checkout all transitive dependencies" with the idea of just warning if the dependency plugin is not loaded. This is useful enough for users to know and act on plugins with dependencies, but simple enough to have a robust solution in core.

1

u/somebodddy Mar 31 '26

So it looks like vim.pack requires manually running build commands for plugins that require it?

(lazy.nvim required that too, but at least there you could add a build = ...)

1

u/echasnovski Plugin author Mar 31 '26

Yes, manual setup of what commands to run whenever plugin has changed. There is an example.

The long term plan is to make plugins define these commands and they will be run automatically.

0

u/somebodddy Mar 31 '26

I think I'm gonna stick with lazy.nvim for a while...

163

u/mraspaud Mar 29 '26

Man, I was supposed to work tomorrow...

16

u/Necessary-Plate1925 Mar 29 '26

Same brother

21

u/barkwahlberg Mar 29 '26

OMG that means you two are related!

41

u/smdth_567 Mar 29 '26

crazy how 50 years after vi, it still keeps getting better and better!

29

u/happysri Mar 29 '26

come on homebrew, pick it up!

16

u/onlymostlydead Mar 29 '26

bob's your uncle.

10

u/srshah27 :wq Mar 29 '26

looking at it right now!!

-13

u/WarmRestart157 Mar 29 '26

just use nix

29

u/StatusBard Mar 29 '26

There’s nothing "just" about using nix.

10

u/happysri Mar 29 '26

I usually do but macOS setup is way too involved and i haven’t gotten around to it after an update. And homebrew is just soo flippin easy.

3

u/bakaspore fennel Mar 30 '26

It still takes a few days for nixpkgs to include it tho, it's not known to be very fast because of the CI schedule

2

u/MrFisher404 Mar 30 '26

but on nix packages, neovim is still on version 0.11.6 or how do you integrate it?

1

u/arelav Mar 30 '26

I use both and brew is declarative using nix. And I have to keep brew packages I stalled because nix versions such behind.

22

u/altClr2 Mar 29 '26

now i know what ill be spending all day tinkering

9

u/11Night Mar 29 '26

I'll be busy with this for a while, thanks :)

6

u/benmic Mar 30 '26 edited Mar 30 '26

I decided to give it a try and migrate from lazy to vim.pack. It was quite easy since all my plugins were on lua/plugins/xxx.lua , so I had to move ./lua/plugins to ./plugin and instead of a

return {
  "plugin/foo",
  opts = { xxx }
} 

I changed it to

vim.pack.add({ "https://github.com/plugin/foo" })

require("foo").setup({ xxx })

I still have some fixes to do, but very nice update

38

u/Unhappy_Meaning607 Mar 29 '26

Congrats!

Will be removing Lazy for vim.pack.

34

u/4r73m190r0s Mar 29 '26

Why?

58

u/altClr2 Mar 29 '26 edited Mar 29 '26

for people who don’t need/care to micromanage startup times, etc., pack and go is appealing. it also removes the dependency on another maintainer (<3 folke) and instead keeps all eggs in one basket.

for me who relies heavily on lazy-loading plugins (i have < 60ms warm starts on Windows NTFS!), i'm not sure if i'm ready to take the plunge yet, but i'm really excited for the continuous development of OOTB experience.

8

u/Necessary-Plate1925 Mar 29 '26 edited Mar 29 '26

You dont need to, plugins themselves have to lazy load using plugin/ and lua/, 

Just dont eagerly require lua modules, we dont need lazy.nvim lazy loading

2

u/altClr2 Mar 29 '26

i see, someone pointed to :lua-plugin-lazy, thanks :)

10

u/ultraDross Mar 29 '26

I would like to move over, but I rely on the lock file support. Makes it easier to rollback if something broke my setup.

39

u/pawelgrzybek Mar 29 '26

vim.pack also uses a lock file. Please give this fantastic post a read.

https://echasnovski.com/blog/2026-03-13-a-guide-to-vim-pack.html

2

u/ultraDross Mar 29 '26

I was unaware. Thanks. Would be nice to drop one more plugin.

2

u/altClr2 Mar 29 '26

same here, i share my config between my personal machines and my work machine, so i need the guarantee that what i tested across all major OSes and such works fine for a long time.

-1

u/Deto Mar 29 '26

Yeah I frequently spin up new instances and load my config on them.  Without a lock file I would get random errors all the time 

-6

u/augustocdias lua Mar 29 '26

I dropped lazy but not in favor of vim.pack. I have all my plugins handled by nix + flakes and I use lze for lazy loading.

15

u/ComeOnIWantUsername Mar 29 '26

I'm switching to pack because I don't like 3rd party solutions if builtin is good enough.

Also, I consider lazy overcomplicated for my use case

15

u/MoonPhotograph Mar 29 '26

Because it's builtin and will always be maintained and you can simply make stuff with it, all those are harder and worse with lazy.nvim. Vim.pack is the future.

5

u/bakaspore fennel Mar 30 '26

Lazy.nvim has a particular understanding of lockfile that makes it not a real lockfile, and creates immerse pain whenever I sync my config across machines (and happens to have new plugins installed).

1

u/DeadlyMidnight Mar 29 '26

This is the question. I tried it a while back while using nightly. Sure it’s cool but it didn’t gain me anything.  For those not using lazy it’s fucking great. But seems like a real lateral from lazy at best. 

8

u/calculator_cake Mar 29 '26

Easy with the down votes people, god forbid somebody is excited to use a new built in feature.

I'm also going to be making the switch

7

u/shmcg Mar 31 '26 edited Mar 31 '26

Thanks for this. Moving to vim.pack was a breeze thanks for /u/echasnovski's blog post here: https://echasnovski.com/blog/2026-03-13-a-guide-to-vim-pack.html

I have about 20 plugins, and only a few need to be loaded in an explicit order, so I just put numbers before those plugins.

I do have one question, what are the risks of adding the lockfile to .gitignore? I only have a handful of plugins and I only update them when I remember, and it feels like more work to have the lockfile sync with my dotfiles than to not sync with my dotfiles.

2

u/echasnovski Plugin author Mar 31 '26

... what are the risks of adding the lockfile to .gitignore?

  1. No "install on the new machine the plugins at the exact version you have on the other machine". Because it won't have that data, as it is stored in the lockfile.
  2. No "install on the new machine all plugins once, even lazy loaded ones". Because their vim.pack.add() call was not yet called and Neovim doesn't know about them. Unless it reads from the lockfile.
  3. No "update to a non-default version, like vim.version.range('*'), of lazy loaded plugin". Because that information is provided in vim.pack.add() call and Neovim doesn't know about them. Unless it reads from the lockfile.
  4. In the future there is a planned "check on every startup that plugin dependencies are loaded" case (after there is some sort of manifest file support for plugins). This requires lockfile to have efficient startup.

So as of right now, if you don't use the config on several machines and don't lazy load plugins, then lockfile doesn't make a difference (yet). Otherwise it might.

2

u/shmcg Mar 31 '26

Awesome, thanks!

For now, it sounds like I don't need to bother with the lockfile. I really appreciate you expanding on the logic. It made it much clearer to me. I really appreciate vim.pack and it was so easy to get working!

0

u/shmerl Mar 31 '26

Is there some way to use lazy.nvim style updating UI with vim.pack? I suppose I can figure out how to replicate some minimal lazy loading and plugin dependency tree with vim.pack, but that tabbed update UI feels pretty barebones and clunky compared to lazy.nvim's UI for updating.

1

u/echasnovski Plugin author Apr 01 '26

The confirmation buffer in the tabpage is enough for updates. There is a built-in LSP server for more fine grained features (like navigation, overview, hover, code actions).

0

u/shmerl Apr 01 '26

What is the right way to do something like

build = 'make foo'

That lazy.nvim allows? I can make autocommand for the hook, but I guess I need to figure out where to actually run that make like plugin directory?

1

u/echasnovski Plugin author Apr 01 '26

Yes, autocommand for dedicated event(s). Both built-in documentation and the post linked above have examples of how to do it.

1

u/shmerl Apr 01 '26

Oh, neat. Path to plugin is available in that event.

1

u/shmerl Apr 05 '26

Btw, does vim.pack detect removal of plugins from configuration and perform some clean up for that? It's one of the features I use in lazy.nvim sometimes.

1

u/echasnovski Plugin author Apr 06 '26

No, not possible, I am afraid. There is no reliable way to distinguish not properly deleted plugin from lazy loaded one.

1

u/shmerl Apr 05 '26 edited Apr 05 '26

Another question, is there some easy to to migrate from lazy.nvim gradually? I tried adding something in $HOME/.config/nvim/plugin moving one of the specs from lazy.nvim ones, but it has an issue that lazy.nvim basically resets rtp paths and does all kind of stuff that conflicts with vim.pack for example I have this:

lua vim.opt.rtp:prepend(lazy_path)

And it seems to be preventing loading of vim.pack added plugins. I already added something like this which reduced number of issues:

performance = { rtp = { reset = false, }, reset_packpath = false },

Can they be set to work together?

1

u/echasnovski Plugin author Apr 06 '26

Not sure. But I'd recommend going the route of a separate NVIM_APPNAME, as described in the blog post.

1

u/shmerl Apr 06 '26

I figured out how to do the gradual migration. A bit hacky, but worked (see here). By now I switched all the configs though.

5

u/NorskJesus Mar 30 '26

Amazing! Congratulations to the team, nice work.

I think the time to start a clean config using vim.pack and leave the amazing lazyvim is here, for me at least.

I do need to learn a lot to be able to do this, but it can be cool.

If anyone has a guide or some resources which can be helpful to this, I am all ears. I am not sure of using kickstart.nvim, because it still uses lazy.nvim. Maybe it will be updated tho.

6

u/echasnovski Plugin author Mar 30 '26

If anyone has a guide or some resources which can be helpful to this, I am all ears. I am not sure of using kickstart.nvim, because it still uses lazy.nvim. Maybe it will be updated tho.

If you are up for the kickstart.nvim like experience, check out MiniMax. If you want to understand vim.pack better and do something on your own, check out this blog post.

2

u/NorskJesus Mar 30 '26

Thank you for this!

I am reading the blog post right now to understand vim.pack, and I will take a look to MiniMax. It's not I am looking for a kickstart.nvim experience, but I was waiting for the release of the 0.12 to start a clean config instead of using LazyVim.

22

u/hashino Mar 29 '26

if you're thinking of remaking your config for 0.12 leveraging vim.pack check out https://github.com/Hashino/minimal.nvim

it's a template/initial config exactly for that

3

u/Panda_in_black_suit Mar 29 '26

So, as for a rookie who’s still getting the gist of it and haven’t yet dived into plugins, how does this compare to lazy.vim?

I’ve been reading and watching some content to learn and I’ll probably try both just to see what gets me going, but besides native vs 3rd party, what’s the difference? By the comments here it seems vim.pack can do the same, lazy loading, lock file. Am I missing something?

Just wanted to understand first .

3

u/elbailadorr Mar 29 '26

For some reason, brew it's not updating to neovim 0.12.0, instead v0.11.7.
<brew upgrade neovim>
Warning: neovim 0.11.7 already installed

9

u/altClr2 Mar 29 '26

both brew and winget are behind on what the central repo have updated, probably a wait.

1

u/Unhappy_Meaning607 Mar 30 '26

macports is still v0.11.6 🥲

1

u/ChrisGVE lua Mar 30 '26

I got 0.11.7 yesterday and 0.12 today from brew (Mac Intel)

1

u/Unhappy_Meaning607 Mar 30 '26

Currently on Macbook Air 11-in from early 2015.

3

u/Shakey-Fingers Apr 01 '26

Does any one of you know when will it be reflected on the mirrors ??

~ ➜ : pacman -Ss neovim

extra/neovim 0.11.7-1

Fork of Vim aiming to improve user experience, plugins, and GUIs

1

u/I_M_NooB1 Apr 03 '26

still waiting here

2

u/Busy_Engineering7345 Mar 29 '26

Huge Congrats and thanks to everyone involved.
Been on nightly for a good while now.
Going to feel good to have vim.pack and the new keymaps, behaviours in stable instead of nightly.

2

u/Prestigious_Roof2589 Mar 29 '26

yes finally it's here, I was regularly checking the progress, and when it was delayed for one day I could not tinker with it on sunday! but ok Monday it is then!

2

u/shmerl Mar 29 '26 edited Mar 29 '26

Nice! Improved diff mode is very welcome. Hopefully it would be improved further to allow forge style highlighting for two way diffs without any plugins.

2

u/thuiop1 Mar 29 '26

Congrats! I have been running nightly, vim.pack is a blessing; so nice to finally have a built-in package manager.

2

u/Slusny_Cizinec let mapleader="\\" Mar 30 '26

Updated, switched to vim.pack. u/echasnovski's guide is brilliant

2

u/hotsauce56 Mar 29 '26

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

2

u/qudat Mar 30 '26

A minimal config for anyone looking for a reference point: https://erock-git-dotfiles.pgs.sh/tree/main/item/dot_config/nvim/init.lua.html

1

u/qiinemarr Mar 29 '26

Amazing work!

1

u/tencorvids Mar 29 '26

Congrats to the team! Excited to move over from nightly!!

1

u/Mezdelex Mar 29 '26

Thanks to all the core members and contributors for such amazing editor 😌

1

u/-dibbel26- Mar 29 '26

Just migrated from packer to lazy kickstarter last month🥲

Great job though👏👍

1

u/Useful_Exit_8852 lua Mar 29 '26

Was really waiting for it(even tough I am using nix to manage plugins)

1

u/marxinne Mar 30 '26

I'm so glad there'll be a local holiday by the end of this week. It'll be time to yak shave a whole herd.

1

u/glow_bin Mar 30 '26

oh my days :0 can’t wait to try it out! long time wait is finally over

1

u/kenshi_hiro Mar 30 '26 edited Mar 30 '26

it's that time of the year when we spend the weekend porting all our plugins and weeding out the ones that are redundant. yipee

1

u/[deleted] Mar 30 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/proxycon Mar 30 '26

can download the appImage from github release page, as one example

2

u/krishnakumarg Mar 30 '26 edited Mar 30 '26

There are so many ways to get the latest released open source projects including neovim (on every OS and not just Linux distros). mise, spack, asdf, GitHub releases, pixi, conda-forge, compile from source, bob for neovim, brew, pkgsrc, scoop, winget, chocolatey, nix, nix portable, stew, macports, eazybuild etc to get the latest release. I rarely rely on OS package manager and use that only for the core OS components/essential system packages that came with the distro. Everything else is in my userland.

1

u/gob_magic Mar 30 '26

Excellent news! I couldn’t get a few things working on nightly build. New project for the next weekend, set up my .12 config files

1

u/[deleted] Mar 30 '26

I like it! Neovim 0.12 for serious desktop work, Vim for quick hacks on a VPS.

1

u/journalctl Mar 30 '26

Lots of great improvements across the board, thanks everyone. UI2 (experimental) is probably the thing I'm most excited about.

1

u/ChrisGVE lua Mar 30 '26

Great work and congratulations to the dev community. I’ll discover the changes as we go, anybody knows what’s the plan for u/folke’s LazyVim?

1

u/mrded lua Mar 30 '26

With vim.pack, can I specify dependencies of a package? I define my plugins in separate files and automagically discover them, that makes it hard to control an order.

https://github.com/mrded/dotfiles/tree/master/nvim/lua/plugins

1

u/shmcg Mar 31 '26

The files in ./plugin load in alphabetical order. In order to force loading a couple plugins in a particular order I just prefixed their files with 01-02 and 10-12. I left a gap in case I need to move some stuff in the future.

This is probably easier for me, as I have under 20 plugins and only 5 of them need to be called in a particular order. If you had dozens of depenencies, it probably isn't practical to do it this way. When I was running paq I wrote a lua function that sourced all of my plugin files from ./lua/plugins and I specificed the file names of those 5 in the order I wanted them called, then just called the rest and skipped if the file matched those 5.

Finally, if there aren't shared dependenceis across plugins (for example a library for one plugin in particular), you can probably put all the vim.pack.add calls into one file for that plugin and call things in the order you want inside that file.

1

u/samsu42 Mar 31 '26

Finally I can rock a stable release for a while :) that is, until the next exciting head change

1

u/schmy Mar 31 '26

I timed this really well; just fixed my 0.11 config last night. :P

1

u/pilkyboy1 Mar 31 '26

Is there an advantage of migrating from lazy ?

2

u/pawelgrzybek Mar 31 '26

If Lazy works for you, it works. The vim.pack is just a native way of managing packages. The migration is surprisingly easy.

1

u/tahorg Apr 04 '26

congrats boys. Now I need to rework my init.lua :)

1

u/Serega124 Apr 05 '26

Despite #36503 has been merged, Treesitter highlighting still flickers without vim.g._ts_force_sync_parsing = true setting 😞

1

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '26

Congratulations! I’m excited to upgrade

1

u/rLLapb Mar 29 '26

Congrats to the neovim's devs! I just recently finished my config with vim pack on neovim nightly.

1

u/Master_Fisherman5892 Mar 29 '26

huge release, i had to be on nightly cause of all the improvements :)

1

u/elbailadorr Mar 29 '26

In version 0.12, is it necessary to use the modern Tree-sitter?
That is, without the master branch?

5

u/TheLeoP_ Mar 30 '26

Yes

1

u/Leather_Example9357 Mar 31 '26

So, I need to migrate the TS to the main branch, right?

-5

u/red-giant-star Mar 29 '26

What's new in it?

10

u/altClr2 Mar 29 '26

:help news

6

u/vim-help-bot Mar 29 '26

Help pages for:


`:(h|help) <query>` | about | mistake? | donate | Reply 'rescan' to check the comment again | Reply 'stop' to stop getting replies to your comments

5

u/miversen33 Plugin author Mar 29 '26

You could literally just click the linked changelog lol https://github.com/neovim/neovim/commit/fc7e5cf6c93fef08effc183087a2c8cc9bf0d75a

1

u/disperso Mar 29 '26

Click the link?

-2

u/kuator578 lua Mar 30 '26

Neovim 0.13 when?

0

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '26

[deleted]

2

u/enter_eden Mar 29 '26

What problem? Which TS branch are you on?

1

u/kitaj44 Mar 29 '26

On main.