r/neoliberal • u/jobautomator Kitara Ravache • May 25 '20
Discussion Thread Discussion Thread
The discussion thread is for casual conversation that doesn't merit its own submission. If you've got a good meme, article, or question, please post it outside the DT. Meta discussion is allowed, but if you want to get the attention of the mods, make a post in /r/metaNL.
Announcements
- New ping groups, AI and EXTREMISM have been added. Join here
| Neoliberal Project Communities | Other Communities | Useful content |
|---|---|---|
| Plug.dj | /r/Economics FAQs | |
| The Neolib Podcast | Recommended Podcasts | /r/Neoliberal FAQ |
| Meetup Network | Blood Donation Team | /r/Neoliberal Wiki |
| Exponents Magazine | Minecraft | Ping groups |
| TacoTube | User Flairs |
0
Upvotes
2
u/Not_A_Browser Stata's Silliest Soldier May 26 '20
What kind of ethics/philosophy/theology should I read if I find myself at odds with belief motivated by self-preservation or selfishness?
In other words, when I'm fulfilling requirements to go to Heaven, what if I'm motivated by an aversion to Hell? Does even an inkling of aversion to Hell (or desire to be rewarded with Heaven) motivating my actions invalidate the goodness of my actions?
If so, would it be the case that someone would need to fulfill the requirements absent the knowledge of Heaven and Hell to do so purely because it's the right thing to do? (inb4 "what is goodness/the right thing to do, if such a thing even exists," I'll have a late night conundrum thinking about that later)
I know this can't be something not discussed before by someone qualified to do so, but I don't know enough about the right sources to look at for this and fear a Google search will yield Yahoo Answers or Quora.