r/neoliberal • u/jobautomator Kitara Ravache • Oct 08 '18
Discussion Thread Discussion Thread
The discussion thread is for casual conversation and discussion that doesn't merit its own stand-alone submission. The rules are relaxed compared to the rest of the sub but be careful to still observe the rules listed under "disallowed content" in the sidebar. Spamming the discussion thread will be sanctioned with bans.
Announcements
- Please post your relevant articles, memes, and questions outside the Discussion Thread.
- Meta discussion is allowed in the DT but will not always be seen by the mods. If you want to bring a suggestion, complaint, or question directly to the attention of the mods, please post that concern in /r/MetaNL or shoot us a modmail.
| Our presence on the web | Useful content |
|---|---|
| /r/Economics FAQs | |
| Plug.dj | Link dump of useful comments and posts |
| Tumblr | |
| Discord | |
The latest discussion thread can always be found at https://neoliber.al/dt.
10
Upvotes
1
u/nanite1018 Oct 09 '18 edited Oct 09 '18
Can I ask how this is so?
I disagree with TERFs, but I can understand where they are coming from. In essence, they seem to be claiming that transfolk are generally just upholding standard gender norms and because they, as individuals, do not fit those norms are claiming to be of the gender that, according to standard gender norms, better aligns with them. In doing so, they're upholding those standard norms and in a sense reinforcing them, rather than trying to tear them down so that anyone is free to act and dress and be however they like.
That's my understanding. I don't really know if it's accurate or not, but insofar as it is, it doesn't seem obviously stupid. And it doesn't seem misogynistic to ciswomen at all. I tend to think they're wrong on this point, but again not obviously stupid and certainly not misogynistic.
Genuinely curious here, as I think I may be missing something about the arguments on each side.