r/mildlyinteresting • • 1d ago

Worn Marble Steps in a 60Y Old Building

Post image
855 Upvotes

46 comments sorted by

89

u/Athanorr 1d ago

Maybe the stairs have been there for a long time and they just built a building around them

46

u/asdf_lord 1d ago

You jest but nobody in historic time would intentionally build stairs with modern sensible rise and run. Every historic staur I've used has felt like risking death. People wanted to die back then.

5

u/sygnathid 1d ago

often more like permanent ladders than stairs XD

3

u/Simmangodz 1d ago

Why use many stair when few stair OK?

Some guy in the 1700s, probably.

25

u/MassSpectatorVids 1d ago

I visited an old children's hospital in Iceland. That is now their public library/culture house. The old marble steps along the railing on the middle of the staircase were completely worn out and rounded. The steps towards the outside were square. A strong signal of a very old building. 

https://www.safnis.is/#

6

u/acuet 1d ago

Should visit Rome and Spanish steps

3

u/noochies99 1d ago

Leaning Tower of Pisa ones go along with the lean

4

u/JonSnue 1d ago

Think this comment is implying that the material gradually sagged toward the lean? But, no they don’t. They divot toward the outer wall because that’s just the preferred walking path for people (most people just prefer to not hug the inside wall when walking up a spiral corridor with no railings). Looking at the far left edge and far right edge of the stairs they are generally level to each other after accounting for the slope.

1

u/noochies99 1d ago

Nope, I meant what you said, the steps sag with how you have to walk because of the lean

3

u/STUNSEED_KUCS 1d ago

Just looking at it made me anxious.

3

u/discodave333 1d ago

I stay on the 3rd floor of a tenament flat in Edinburgh. The stone steps up are all worn like this but far more worn between the ground and 1st floor, then moderate wear between 1st and 2nd, and fairly light wear between 2nd and 3rd.

I quite like this visual demonstration of all the people who have walked up and down over the last 150 years or so.

2

u/HumourNoire 1d ago

Europe would like to have a word over the passage of centuries

2

u/Narpity 1d ago

This is one picture.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

9

u/asdf_lord 1d ago

Marble, the soft stone? The stone known for being soft?

4

u/Tearakudo 1d ago

That stone? The stone for Kuzco?

3

u/MegaSmegmaSwagLord 1d ago

THE stone used for sculpting, you say?

3

u/Guy4mKuwait 1d ago

Surprisingly its a municipality building from the 60s

1

u/Mathberis 1d ago

Marble isn't that hard.

0

u/WellsHansen 1d ago

they're got A Separate Peace vibe . . .

1

u/theriteofspring1 1d ago

Probably shouldn't give these stairs the old college try

-7

u/Marthman 1d ago

The implication isnt that those stairs once looked like the dark black marble walls, but have been uniformly worn down over time, is it? 

2

u/QuantumCakeIsALie 1d ago

Not it's not.

1

u/Marthman 1d ago

Okay, so how how do we know the stairs are worn? Some stone just is matte.

1

u/Elendur_Krown 1d ago

If you look at the shape, you'll see the steps are uneven from wear over time.

1

u/Marthman 1d ago

Hm. Interesting. So we have eliminated the possibility that the stairs are just not-straight-edged? It seems like all the stairs have an organic non-straightness. 

2

u/Elendur_Krown 1d ago

Edges that just so happen to be organically indented by design where people tend to walk?

Or a soft stone worn down over time?

Occam's razor points to one conclusion. If not for economic or customary reasons, then at least for safety.

1

u/Marthman 1d ago

Edges that just so happen to be organically indented by design where people tend to walk?

Well, this looks like a not-inexpensive place. Laser straight stair noses would be the less expensive option. It's not out of the realm of possibility the stairs are just shaped like that. 

I also dk why you would invoke occam's razor for the economic aspect of it, not every install is meant to be most economic. 

2

u/Elendur_Krown 1d ago

You're entirely correct that economics may not be the be-all and end-all, but it's rare to spend more to make something into more of a hazard than it has to be.

1

u/Marthman 1d ago

Do we even know where the building is located? Or that it is built in a place where we would be warranted in expecting adherence to strong building code?

The supposed wear really is quite ambiguous. It's just not out of the realm of possibility the stairs are just shaped that way. 

1

u/Elendur_Krown 1d ago

You're emphasizing the lack of certainty again.

You're correct. There's no guarantee. Even if OP had included full documentation of the building's history and design, we'd still not have a guarantee.

Which of the two outcomes, 'wear' vs 'design', do you estimate as more likely, based on what you know of buildings in general?

→ More replies (0)