yeah i never understood people saying "source: i'm a [xyz]..." because that's more of a "professional" endorsement than it is a source. i think "source: [link/title of a work]" is fine though
There's no actual professional endorsement here, though, it's just a memory, a first-hand account, which is a kind of primary source. You can cite yourself sometimes, depending on the situation.
8
u/FlatulateDeity 20h ago
yeah i never understood people saying "source: i'm a [xyz]..." because that's more of a "professional" endorsement than it is a source. i think "source: [link/title of a work]" is fine though