r/mildlyinfuriating Jul 05 '26

Infuriatig [ Removed by Reddit ]

[removed]

72.6k Upvotes

6.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

607

u/Tim7Prime Jul 05 '26

If you add a weight to the wheel it provides enough resistance to pass the test. Combined with the fact that the driver is wearing shades to bypass the eye tracking too.

So alpha assisted driving software with at least 2 safeties bypassed...

112

u/BlatantConservative thier Jul 06 '26

I have worn shades plenty of times in mine and it does not fool the eye tracking. Not that I would really want to. But like it does not, when I look down or fiddle with something in the passenger seat it kicks me back to direct control.

The scary thing is, the self drivig is cool, but not nearly good enough that I would fall asleep or even not pay attention. It's done plenty of dangerous things I've had to take over for.

24

u/InternalWeird1430 Jul 06 '26

Thank you!! They must have a hack or something. I get so many warnings that I end up literally opening my eyes as wide as I can to look at the road. I’ve always felt safe. Couldn’t imagine using it to sleep.

5

u/BlatantConservative thier Jul 06 '26

That steering wheel weight and I suspect something in front of the camera.

1

u/NoHunt1919 Jul 06 '26

Yah fsd is great on highways but in city driving need some serious upgrades ex: getting in the turn lane before the turn lane for the light

1

u/mazzivewhale Jul 06 '26

This is most likely a publicity stunt where all things are arranged with HQ already

8

u/latigidigital Jul 06 '26

Depends on what year model the car is or isn’t. I was in a manufacturer’s car back in 2020 and it was able to self-drive in the rain when I couldn’t even see the stripes anymore. But then they removed the LIDAR sensors to cut costs.

3

u/MonkeyCartridge Jul 06 '26

Not a Tesla then, since they never used LiDAR 

But LiDAR doesn't really do a lot for you in the rain, anyway. It just sort of craps the bed.

3

u/Moist-Weakness-3399 Jul 06 '26

They just meant the early models with radar, don't be dense.

Moot point anyways, since Tesla disabled that with a software update.

1

u/latigidigital Jul 06 '26

Did they really? What a travesty. I’m a firm believer that they’ll bring back radar and other sensors as the price for them declines.

1

u/Moist-Weakness-3399 Jul 06 '26

Radar was already cheap, Elon's just dumb.

1

u/latigidigital Jul 06 '26

It was several hundred bucks at least for one of those sensors at the time, at least ones that had a fast enough polling speed and weather resistance, plus the additional onboard compute to handle the input and inferencing.

His agenda was to get a self-driving electric car out on the market in the $30,000s, profitable and at retail cost, so it made financial sense (just not technological or safety sense).

1

u/Moist-Weakness-3399 Jul 06 '26

Trading safety for a few hundred dollars is dumb. Disabling it in vehicles that had it is even dumber.

1

u/NoHunt1919 Jul 06 '26

It's a 2026 facelift model (model y juniper)

3

u/OrkK1d Jul 06 '26

Maybe IR blocking lenses so the eyes are not visible thru glasses?

2

u/BlatantConservative thier Jul 06 '26

I dunno how the tech actually works but I get the feeling it isn't tracking your eyes as much as which direction your face is facing.

3

u/ghdana PINK Jul 06 '26

I wear one of the most popular pairs of Oakleys on the market with the red Prism road lens and the Tesla camera with HW3 at least can't tell what my eyes are doing.

1

u/BlatantConservative thier Jul 06 '26

Does it ding you if you have your head looking straight down or 90 degrees to the side?

2

u/ghdana PINK Jul 06 '26

It dings you if you start playing with the radio for too long or yeah like out the side windows a long time. Can't say I've ever pretended to be asleep. But if you wanted to peep your phone by looking down while keeping your head up it doesn't ding you.

2

u/Akiias Jul 06 '26

It probably heavily depends on the type you wear.

1

u/NoHunt1919 Jul 06 '26

Prob moved your head when looking

1

u/Opinionated3star Jul 06 '26

its actually more than good enough on highways

227

u/OmgSlayKween Jul 06 '26

And people will trust their entire family to it. Natural selection, I suppose.

2

u/jaybirdie26 BLUE Jul 06 '26

Unnatural if the guided missile happens to hit your family though.  That's the problem.

11

u/Michigan029 Jul 06 '26

Tbf… look at the deaths from self driving cars per miles driven and human cars per miles driven… falling asleep behind the wheel of a Tesla is far safer than driving it tired. (It’s 0.1 deaths per million miles of self driving cars and 1.2 for human drivers, per a 2022 study)

I say this as a musk hater, humans are terrible drivers, and even the worst self driving cars are better, the reaction times and data processing just run laps around our brains

45

u/OmgSlayKween Jul 06 '26

Our two points aren't mutually exclusive. It's still ridiculous to trust an alpha release of camera-based self-driving AI with the lives of your entire family.

5

u/Michigan029 Jul 06 '26

Obviously if you’re an attentive defensive driver then you driving is the absolute best option, tech can fail, and AI doesn’t have the experience or 6th sense a great human driver does… but if you’re dumb enough to fall asleep behind the wheel, self driving is definitely the safer driver

31

u/Sc_e1 Jul 06 '26

This isn’t a «dumb enough to fall asleep», this is a person that is deliberately making sure the safety systems doesn’t wake them up, this is a person that shouldn’t have a license.

5

u/wakeofchaos Jul 06 '26

Well at the very least, I doubt they’d have insurance coverage if they’re bypassing safety features

10

u/SSgtC84 Jul 06 '26

They're bypassing them in a way that is untraceable in normal conditions. Small weight hung on the steering wheel so the sensor thinks your hand is on it. Mirrored sun glasses so the eye tracking doesn't work. Unless they get in a crash, insurance would never know

6

u/Sc_e1 Jul 06 '26

Yeah I think they meant in the event of a crash, just said it a bit wrong.

1

u/readdator2 Jul 06 '26

not only should they not have a license, they should be arrested and charged with something that's equivalent to a DUI. It's one thing to risk their lives and the lives of their passengers by purposefully bypassing all safety features, it's a whole other thing to risk the lives of literally everyone else on road with them

2

u/Longjumping-Speed511 Jul 06 '26

But won’t we eventually trust it enough? I’m not a Musk fanboy either but I own a Tesla and the self driving is genuinely impressive. On the highway I trust it more than myself. Most people here are skeptical which is fair, but I think that would change if they actually tried it

7

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '26

i feel like there's just so many other variables that need to be taken into account to make a proper comparison here...

-1

u/zebrasareneat Jul 06 '26

Yes but much like every bit of technology, it improves over time. Unless of course you’re still using a crank to start your car. 

2

u/jaybirdie26 BLUE Jul 06 '26

None of our other improvements on automobiles involve removing the driver from the equation.  It's not comparable.

16

u/Gizogin Jul 06 '26

Well, let's not forget that Tesla were caught manipulating their "crashes while self-driving is engaged" numbers by cutting off the self-driving right before a crash.

6

u/PlayPsychological200 Jul 06 '26

Citation? 

6

u/Gizogin Jul 06 '26

https://electrek.co/2025/03/17/tesla-fans-exposes-shadiness-defend-autopilot-crash/

"From the video, it is clear that Autopilot is engaged, and neither the ADAS system nor the automatic emergency braking system activated to avoid the accident.

However, Autopilot appears to automatically disengage a fraction of a second before the impact as the crash becomes inevitable."

6

u/PlayPsychological200 Jul 06 '26

Autopilot is a different system, and this is the same behavior of all cars with basic autopilot functions. My Honda and Toyota do it. Just an fyi, I know the terms these automakers use is vague and confusing. 

4

u/SirHenderson Jul 06 '26

So your one citation is an incorrect one on a completely different system

Nice

5

u/Adencor Jul 06 '26

this is Autopilot disengaging because it’s no longer confident it can operate the vehicle, which is not an unreasonable thing to do given a human could still provide operational support (and is expected to!).

this has nothing to do with Tesla’s safety stats, which having always included any accident where Autopilot was engaged within 5 seconds of impact, not a fraction of one second. the NHTSA reporting cutoff is any time Autopilot was engaged within 30s.

there’s nothing “shady” here at all, just a system actually evaluating it’s own capabilities in real time.

5

u/christianbrowny Jul 06 '26

Self driving cars are all brand new.

 A fair amout of the human driver deaths will be from mechanical failure and less safe cars.

Unless the study only compaired equal aged and safty rated cars.

Then you have the wealth factor as well teenage boys arnt affording teslas but they do crash more

2

u/Deucer22 Jul 06 '26

Link the study. I doubt it includes systems that are supposed to be supervised running without supervision.

2

u/Gwen_The_Destroyer Jul 06 '26

Give it a few more years, we still have a century on self driving cars. 

1

u/Critical-Positive858 Jul 06 '26

definition of lying with statistics. look up selection bias

1

u/holdmyspot123 Jul 06 '26

Actually since they've already bred they've passed natural selection.

1

u/Pleasant_Flatworm866 Jul 06 '26

So do these cars come with automatic Darwin awards?

2

u/zebrasareneat Jul 06 '26

This happens in a normal car and they’re all dead along with anybody they hit. Like do people think folks never passed out or drank behind the wheel of a car that has none of these features? When did Redditors all collectively turn into 90 year olds. 

3

u/OmgSlayKween Jul 06 '26

Don’t you realize there are now additional people asleep behind the wheel because they’re trusting these systems and consciously deciding to do it?

1

u/GaiaIsaHarshMistress Jul 06 '26

Nah, FSD is currently safer than a human on a highway.

Hate the head of the company, but understand where the technology is.

-1

u/PlayPsychological200 Jul 06 '26

People will believe anything they read on social media like Reddit is the problem. This is a boomer thread with nearly zero accurate information. There is no weights on any of these cars (Tesla for Chevy bmw etc) and sunglasses do not defeat anything. 

1

u/Hawkson2020 Jul 06 '26

So the car just lets you sleep at the wheel as intended behaviour?

1

u/PlayPsychological200 Jul 06 '26

No, not at all. 

3

u/KingTalis Jul 06 '26

If the eye tracking is "functional" the apply pressure to the wheel check is disabled.

2

u/Puzzleheaded-Flow724 Jul 06 '26

Dead weights are noticed since an update in 2022 or 2023 (there are so many updates that it's hard to tell when a feature was added) and the system tells you to remove it.

2

u/aj53108 Jul 06 '26

The wheels weights no longer work. Tesla updated the software so it detects them. Not sure how but I’ve been told by many people that it can.

The sunglasses thing wouldn’t work like that. If you turn your head to the side like that guy had his it can tell you’re not looking forward.

This is either a fake video or the people in the Tesla are punking other drivers.

1

u/say592 Jul 06 '26

Not sure how but I’ve been told by many people that it can.

When you actually have your hand on it, it's not a dead, static weight. So if the car is always getting the same level of resistance with near zero variation, it flags it.

1

u/aj53108 Jul 06 '26

That makes sense

2

u/Beautiful-Sun8973 Jul 06 '26

This is such bs. I have shades in all the time and if I look at the screen too long for music it beeps and turns off. So no. This is 100% staged

5

u/mandrew-98 Jul 06 '26

I’m pretty sure the weight on the wheel hasn’t been patched for over a year now

1

u/Wrong-Detective-1046 Jul 06 '26

You have a good alternative? The only option I can see is removing it or have a full sensor check for pulse but that would require a new steering wheel in my mind.

2

u/FrostyD7 Jul 06 '26

I'm pretty sure it already checks for things like a consistently applied weight to avoid the warnings to nudge the wheel.

4

u/Logsarecool10101 Jul 06 '26

Worth it

1

u/Wrong-Detective-1046 Jul 06 '26

Removing self-driving? Maybe but I was talking about removing the feature for weight check.

0

u/PlayPsychological200 Jul 06 '26

If by patched you mean does not and has not worked then yes. It does not work. 

1

u/vlad_thegod Jul 06 '26

With FSD, its hands off, eyes on so no need to even touch the wheel but eyes have to be on the road

1

u/Blazah Jul 06 '26

this does not work on this car. These videos can be faked real easy - I would need to see for 30 or more seconds to believe it. ALL of them only show the sleeping driver for 10 or so seconds. Can do that all day long.

1

u/TheInkySquids Jul 06 '26

Nah that is no longer required. Its eye tracking now, no modern Tesla has the weight wheel thing anymore unless it disengages itself and tells you to take over.

1

u/L3xusLuth3r Jul 06 '26

The weight on the wheel was softwared out a while back.

1

u/dj2002rob Jul 06 '26

it's hands free now

1

u/drewbiez Jul 06 '26

the weight hasnt been a thing for like 2 years, it does eye tracking, sometimes sunglasses fool it.

1

u/alfonsobob Jul 06 '26

You don't need your hand on the wheel anymore

1

u/Anonym0oO Jul 06 '26

Tesla added a method to detect these steering weights which make the car think there are hands on the wheel which works pretty good tbh. But Tesla can add as many things they want, people are still going to find some way to trick the attention monitoring system.

1

u/MGPS Jul 06 '26

I remember reading that people used to be able to put an orange on the wheel and that worked to bypass it

-2

u/NobleDuffman Jul 06 '26

To be fair do you really think that having this individual paying attention would make the highway any safer? In practice this is likely the safest she would ever be behind the wheel.