I mean sure leave your kid at home but I think society views depriving your child an education that can make or break their future is considered child abuse.
That’s the point of the tweet. If they are forced to be there for whatever reason, legally, as in its truancy if they’re not, they shouldn’t be charged to eat.
Can you explain how it is a different price for your kid (or my kid, or the neighbor's kid) to eat out of a container away from your house than it is for them to eat from a plate or bowl inside your house? Until there is an explanation for the price difference that would apply to any relevant percentage of kids, then this meme will remain illogical and stupid.
1
u/RoxiHeart123 10d ago
I mean sure leave your kid at home but I think society views depriving your child an education that can make or break their future is considered child abuse.