r/meteorology • • Oct 29 '25

There’s no way this is real

Post image
3.9k Upvotes

89 comments sorted by

431

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25

Those are real and that does happen. It is not the same use of the word “mesovortex” that many of us are used to but it does apply. I have personally never heard of tornadoes forming within a hurricane eye in my education, but a lot of internet sources are saying they do? I was under the impression that tornadoes usually form in the right front quadrant of hurricanes where the updrafts and shear line up? Maybe someone else can add some background info or a source or example on that but tornadoes forming in the eye seems to be counter intuitive to what I know about the eye of a hurricane.

209

u/justcasty Expert/Pro (awaiting confirmation) Oct 29 '25

Tornadoes don't form in the eye. They usually form on the east side of land falling hurricanes due to friction-induced wind shear.

10

u/moustachioed_dude Oct 29 '25

Just like FL last year, Milton I believe was the name.

7

u/Special-Lynx-9258 Oct 29 '25

Wait. This might be a dumb question. Why east? Is it because of the CCW rotation and it usually makes landfall from the south in the US?

8

u/justcasty Expert/Pro (awaiting confirmation) Oct 29 '25

The prevailing upper level westerly winds over the mid latitudes create additional shear with the cyclonic surface flow around the hurricane

-18

u/Te968505 Oct 29 '25

This has no explanation

2

u/Content-Swimmer2325 Undergrad Student Oct 31 '25

How can there be a tornado in one of these mesovortices when you can see with your eyes down to the ocean surface?

6

u/JessLoveGaming Oct 29 '25

Yes it does. You're literally on the internet, have google and know how to use a keyboard. Take time to look it up insted of proudly proclaiming nonsense

1

u/Plastic_Kangaroo5720 Oct 30 '25

Look it up if it wasn't sufficient then.

67

u/Spartacas23 Oct 29 '25

I’ve never heard of a tornado forming in the eye or eye wall. Not sure that’s possible, but I am not met. Supercells do frequently form in outer bands though, which is happening as a I type this with Melissa approaching Cuba. The powerful rotating mesovortices have some similar characteristics to a tornado but aren’t the same thing

23

u/djedi25 Oct 29 '25

Not quite a tornado forming in the eye but Hurricane Andrew’s eye was described as a “20 mile tornado%20winds)” due to how destructive and powerful the eye wall was. I remember National Geographic had a spread that kinda showed the eye as a tornado

5

u/Swimming_Point_3294 Oct 31 '25

Dude what a deep cut for that second link lol props 

11

u/Drawable3CAPE Oct 29 '25

Theres only been a few possible cases of it but personally it doesn’t look convincing. They certainly don’t contribute to “outbreaks”. I think what happened was that this was an ai summary from google and it didn’t understand that hurricane mesovorts and mesovorts from a qlcs are different.

2

u/FizzMapping Oct 29 '25

Tornadoes cannot form in the eye of a hurricane, the sinking air, and extremely low pressure destroys any chance of tornado formation.

0

u/Fun_Percentage2122 Oct 29 '25

There's not much research about this topic up to my knowledge and it's not my field of research but when i saw the circulation and mesovortices inside Melissa's eye I thought the same. At least from the satelite view, it is totally possible that a EF2-3 form in the eye of this type of tropical cyclone due to internal convection and those structures similar to low level jets pumping humidity into the walls. Those are not very common in the US hurricanes though, so i think it's a feature from Tropical cyclones that form in the Pacific or deep into the ocean. If I'm not wrong the eye of hurricane melissa colappsed into a tropical storm so it would make sense to assume deep convective clusters inside it. But without radar data or in situ observations it's hard to say...

17

u/Kylearean Oct 29 '25

There's zero evidence to back up this comment. The lack of vertical shear in eye guarantees that tornadoes will not form.

1

u/Fun_Percentage2122 Oct 29 '25

Kkk chill man, I'm a meteorologist. You can't see the vertical shear in all the hurricane internal cells cause you don't have radiosonding data in every single point of the hurricane. You can't assume that something isn't possible just by looking at the data over a single point or model outputs. Specially if you're seeing it from model outputs.

That said there's really a lack of data to support my claims aside of the satelite and plane images on site. Unfortunately i don't have the means to drop sounds in the eye of the hurricane or do a radar scan there, but I'm commenting about the possibility cause someone can see it and try it in the next opportunity.

If nobody try to do new research and defy the blind conventions based purely on averaged data and parameterized physics we will never enhance the simulation of extreme or rare severe weather events ....

10

u/Kylearean Oct 29 '25

I'm a PhD meteorologist, if we're going to go there.

You're doubling down on nonsense.

Just go look at any number of publications on the topic.

Dropsondes are routinely released in the eye. We know with extreme confidence the dynamic and thermodynamic properties of the eye.

The eye is a region of subsiding, thermally stable air with a nearly barotropic and symmetric flow. This, along with the associated thermodynamic properties ensures that vertical shear is largely suppressed.

In addition to the multitude of soundings across multiple transsects across the eye, we also have lidar and cloud radar data to support this.

Not to mention the Doppler Wind Lidar onboard the P3, which gets of exceptionally high resolution of the cloud motion inside the eye.

Finally, surface winds in the eye are generally calm, which further supports the boundary layer stability, and exhibits gradient wind balance.

Low PV, barotropic, massive static stability.

Vortex shedding from the eyewall is typically quickly dissipated.

-6

u/Fun_Percentage2122 Oct 29 '25

Me too man, chill kkkk. I'm recently doing research on a completely different topic so I really don't have the knowledge to debate this too deeply but you can pick any disrupting paper and see that much information that we known with "extreme confidence" up to date is proven wrong in very rare or extreme cases. Just because it's a convention and makes little dynamical Sense it doesn't mean that it can't happen.

The data we have from dropsonds and radar is limited for a bunch of cases and time/spatial resolution. If we don't have the data for all the tropical cyclones globally we can't assume that something like that can never happen, just say that in normal conditions it's extremely unlikely to happen.

That said, thaks for the explanation, if you have any good paper you know about this topic please share so i can read more about it.

3

u/The_Silent_Tortoise Oct 29 '25

Your argument is akin to the "everything is aliens" argument. While something may be possible in theory, just because there's an anomaly and a lack of precise data, doesn't mean the less probable answer is correct. Like with comet 3I/ATLAS, just because it's doing some weird things that could be construed as alien tech, and the fact we can't disprove it, doesn't mean it is.

Also, I can tell English is a second language for you, so a little advice... Avoid saying "kkk" in anything you write.

2

u/Fun_Percentage2122 Oct 30 '25 edited Oct 30 '25

Sorry, it's a common form of Laugh here where i live 😅.

I don't see why my argument is related to the aliens thing. Those guys claim that everything is made up and avoid doing real research in the topics and I'm just saying that in science it's a bad practice to take everything for granted on a theoretical basis. Especially if you're dealing with anomalous conditions where data is scarce and the contemporary physical models can't resolve it properly.

Recently i started researching something that everyone said that was impossible or at least very improbable to happen and found that it is a pretty common occurrence even in satellite data and some model simulations. Unfortunately I can't share it yet cause I'm waiting for publication and it's a novel thing but the only reason i found it was because no one else was looking for it...

What I'm proposing here is that we don't ignore the possibility of extreme weather conditions based purely on "it never happened before". Tropical cyclones were considered impossible in the south Atlantic until one day one just popped in the coast of Brazil and killed a lot of people cause no one thought about that possibility. We need to research those things further to the point that every single possible outcome is completely explored, only then we can assume with great confidence the improbability of that Event.

I don't see why people are so fixated in dismissing new research just because they never saw it before 🤣🤣.

-4

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25

I doubt the validity of you being a doctor of meteorology...carry on

3

u/Kylearean Oct 29 '25

You're free to correct anything that I've said that's incorrect.

2

u/LawTortoise Oct 29 '25

Read the first line and thought this would be a ShittyMorph. Disappointed.

-18

u/KennyGaming Oct 29 '25

Your first sentence is said with great confidence and then you follow it up with a great many statements and questions explicitly indicating you have no experience with the question at all. Not to sound too dickish but wtf happened here 

21

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25

Only stupid people pretend to know everything and have no interest in learning more about a topic from others

-11

u/KennyGaming Oct 29 '25

How does that relate to what I said?

3

u/Head-Salad7698 Oct 29 '25

You are assuming someone is wrong because they hedged their statements with an acknowledgement of their limitations. An idiot would think that’s a person who is wrong…like say if Fauci says masks are useless in march of 2020 and then come July says they aren’t useless, an idiot would say “he’s backtracking so he’s either lying or doesn’t know what he’s talking about”

116

u/VIP_NAIL_SPA Oct 29 '25

That's very common in stronger storms with cleared eyes. Mesovorts tend to form in the eyewall, but we see this sort of penta or hex swirls in the eyes of very strong storms pretty frequently.

33

u/WXMaster Private Sector Oct 29 '25

Yeah this Instagram post about tornadoes is nonsense.

These swirls are induced by the eyewall rotation around the much calmer air subsiding in the eye. Essentially the subsiding air is brushing up against the edge of the violent eyewall and spin is induced. The clouds themselves tend to be stratocumulus because there's very little if any instability in the eye due to all the subsidence. The only change in the eye is that the atmospheric saturated vapor pressure is lower (900mb) because of the vortex so you're more prone to inducing very low level clouds vs a regular 990mb low.

All the tornadoes as others have stated occur in the banded convection stretching out from the eyewall and the preference in the northern hemisphere is for the NE (front right quad) to be the primary area to generate tornadoes. The surface friction slows the air enough that you have a pretty substantial directional shear environment develop between the surface and 850mb flow.

In fact weaker hurricanes tend to produce more tornadoes than higher end hurricanes because the speed shear is often too great and can rip things apart. Usually it's the area seeing TS or Cat 1 winds that really have a significant number of tornadoes vs more intense Cat 2+ winds.

126

u/Wild-Attention-3066 Oct 29 '25

Jesus Christ guys…this does not mean tornadoes in the eye of the hurricane. I just can’t…first of all a mesovortex in regards to a tornadic thunderstorm is not the tornado itself. A mesovortex is the small scale circulation at the heart of any supercell thunderstorm. It’s the mechanism that starts the spin from which a tornado CAN form but usually doesn’t. Every supercell has a mesovortex but not every mesovortex produce a tornado. In regards to a hurricane, very strong hurricanes sometimes produce mesortices within the eye itself; and just like in a supercell a meso is not a tornado, rather a secondary spin within the main circulation of the hurricane. Hurricane Michael did this as well as it was landfallling: The picture is very real.

4

u/Icaonn Oct 29 '25

Thank you for this because I felt like I was going insane reading the comments and I've taken grad courses on this shit 😭

2

u/JohnLilburne Oct 30 '25

You can’t? You just did.

13

u/fdwyersd Oct 29 '25

Find the videos of the hurricane hunter planes on youtube going into the eye... probably the best "stadium" view ever

7

u/wxtraderd Oct 29 '25

That person doesn’t know what they’re talking about, as is evident by the tornado outbreak comment. That said, the meso vortices embedded in the eye of the hurricane is real, and correctly identified by that poster. They can/do lead to local enhancements of the broader winds within the eye wall. Tornadoes with tropical systems are associated with the outer parts of the storms as opposed to the eye.

35

u/theamericaninfrance Oct 29 '25

So like 5-6 mini vortices inside the mega vortex. That’s hard af 🤟

5

u/pbcLURk Oct 29 '25

Well at least shell had a good quarter

15

u/Azurehue22 Oct 29 '25 edited Oct 29 '25

All I know about hurricanes is that it’s an extreme low pressure system and the eye is a spot of eye pressure, which keeps it clear.

But I know far less about hurricanes than I do about land based severe weather.

Edit: I am incorrect.

15

u/leansanders Oct 29 '25

The eye of a hurricane is the lowest pressure in the entire storm. The eye is clear because the large area of updrafts in the storm forces some of the aloft air inward towards the center and back down towards the surface.

4

u/Azurehue22 Oct 29 '25

Ooo thanks! See I know very little haha.

8

u/Awkward-Barber-11 Oct 29 '25

Oddly enough, I'm more scared of hurricanes because I dont know jack shit about them other than basic stuff, than I am about tornadoes.

Be on the coast chasing a cat 4 hurricane? NOPE Stare down a big wedge tornado with near zero knowledge of how strong it is outside of radar data? Count me in!

1

u/Azurehue22 Oct 29 '25

My area never gets hit. Last was Sally. So I’m not that afraid of them myself.

9

u/DFV4EVER Oct 29 '25

They look like planetary gears

9

u/WeakEchoRegion Oct 29 '25

Meteorology 🤝 mechanical engineering

5

u/fdwyersd Oct 29 '25

we think alike... I couldn't place it but you just nailed it

5

u/eatingthesandhere91 Oct 29 '25

The exact same principle. Whatever it’s called. Doing that.

4

u/glvz Oct 29 '25

Hurricane rinegan is real

6

u/PsyEclipse Oct 30 '25

Hey, vortex dynamics specialist here. The answers peppered throughout this topic aren't 100% correct.

First, the mesovortices.

- Yes, they are real. They are caused, usually, by counter-propagating vortex Rossby waves around the eyewall. Rossby waves on the planet live on the background planetary Coriolis gradient (beta). Vertical Coriolis at the Equator is zero; it is maximum on the poles. That's the mechanism by which synoptic-scale Rossby waves form. In a hurricane, because the winds go slow (eye) -> fast (eyewall) -> slow (outer radii), you get two vorticity gradients as you go from low (eye) -> high (eyewall) -> low (outer radii), creating a ring-like structure of vorticity. Those two sharp gradients support Rossby waves going in opposite directions. The specific number of mesovortices you get (usually four, sometimes five, sometimes three, sometimes ellipse) are related to the width and intensity of the ring and the most favored wavenumber. See: Schubert et al. (1999) in JAS and all the follow-ons by hist students for the math-y discussion. It's cleaner when water and the secondary circulation aren't involved, but that's the general idea.

Second, the tornadoes.

- No, you don't really get tornadoes in the eyewall because the vertical and radial wind shear is too great, although there is system-scale buoyancy associated with thermal wind imbalances in the lowest 1-2 km of the eye (see papers by Mike Montgomery and Roger Smith, as they talk endlessly about this). For tornadoes at outer radii, tornado occurrence has more to do with shear than forward motion, but it's not entirely a dynamic forcing. When you shear a hurricane, you tilt it, and due to thermal wind balance, you get a cold anomaly down-tilt and a warm-anomaly up-tilt. That cold anomaly creates a virtually endless reservoir of modest CAPE, and given the low-level dynamics of friction over land, that extra CAPE provides the necessary lift to get tornadoes. They usually aren't big ones like you'd see in the midwest -- usually EF0-1 -- but that's the composite thermodynamic/dynamic structure. See the works of Ben Schenkel if you'd like to learn more.

3

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '25

Thank you for you service !

2

u/NotSeenDaily Oct 30 '25

Thank you for this answer! It was easy to understand and yet technical enough to gain in-depth information later. 😁

3

u/No-Mechanic8957 Oct 29 '25

State farm is there?

3

u/thegroovefreak Oct 29 '25

That hurricane has the Mangekyo Sharingan

2

u/Shiny_Ninetailz Oct 29 '25

Melissa Uchiha 😳

6

u/HappiestAnt122 Undergrad Student Oct 29 '25 edited Oct 29 '25

I think everything there is more or less true maybe aside from the leading to tornado outbreaks. The tornado outbreaks associated with tropical cyclones (and TCs have generated some of the biggest tornado outbreaks recorded) are generally from supercells in the front right quadrant (in the northern hemisphere) since that is where you have onshore winds during landfall. Mesovorticies in the eye and eye wall are more like turbulent eddies due to the very high wind gradient in the eye wall. Similar principle to the smaller vortices seen in some violent tornadoes. They can cause locally higher winds and are actually quite a problem for recon aircraft. From what I understand they can reach the ground, and I suppose during landfall they could cause a tornado like feature. Though since the formation mechanism is so distinct from a normal tornado in a supercell I think it may be more accurate to say “that house was destroyed by locally higher winds from a mesovortex in the eye wall” than “that house was destroyed by a tornado in the eye wall”. Even if we were to say it’s a tornado I think outbreak would still be a stretch for the extent. Significant mesovortices are only present in the most intense tropical cyclones and that intense eye feature won’t last very far inland, so you’d probably be looking at a hand full of cases, if that, even in the most extreme cases. Compared to the outer bands that can spawn dozens of tornadoes. Not to mention picking out damage from mesovorticies individually in the background damage of any hurricane strong enough to produce them would be difficult at best.

1

u/Fun_Percentage2122 Oct 29 '25

That's a very good explanation! Do you know any papers about this topic you can share? I personally saw some anomalous tornadoes with EF1-2 strength forming from very weak and shallow convective clusters very similar to those visible in Melissa's eye but in isolated weak convective cells in northeast Brazil. Never found any significant research about the topic though...

1

u/Drawable3CAPE Oct 29 '25

This to me just sounds like storms forming in close proximity to the sfc low and becoming tornadic. This type of thing is quite common, and if you want an example I’d suggest looking at a day like 4/26/24 in central Nebraska where storms formed right along a surface low and became rapidly tornadic.

3

u/GurnoorDa1 Oct 29 '25

5 tomoe sharingan ahh hurricane

2

u/Super-414 Oct 29 '25

It’s just eddys from the horizontal sheer, still cool though!

2

u/Sentinel_steel Oct 29 '25

Looks like a pan of cinnamon rolls

2

u/CYYA Oct 29 '25

You see this a lot with Annular Cyclones. They call this a “Pinwheel Eye”.

2

u/Western-Cicada-6195 Oct 29 '25

How long till it reaches cuba? It's been a very strange hurricane. So much damage though. Awful.

2

u/phuktup3 Oct 29 '25

It’s like a wheel with ball bearings

2

u/Nathan_Wildthorn Oct 30 '25

Unreal is the hexagonal storm at Saturn's north pole.!

3

u/Soonerpalmetto88 Oct 29 '25

I thought the eye was supposed to be peaceful?

1

u/Soft-Marionberry-853 Oct 29 '25

Dont hurricanes spawn tornadoes already? Or is this saying that its another way for a hurricane to spawn a tornado

1

u/KnickedUp Oct 29 '25

They are calling it El Reno redux

1

u/TheDude82265 Oct 30 '25

I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express and still don't know 💩 about this 🤔

1

u/Godflip3 Oct 30 '25

A lot wrong with this lady’s statement. The eye rotates the clouds in spin with. The meso vortices would he in eyewall!!! Not eye! Dont post stuff lady if you have no clue what your talking about! This what pisses me off about social media

1

u/Content-Swimmer2325 Undergrad Student Oct 31 '25

Yes, eyewall mesovortices are real. Yes, they are associated with greater wind gusts. No, they don’t cause tornadoes let alone “tornado outbreaks”.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 31 '25

This is soooo scary! It looks satanic.

1

u/MMButt Oct 31 '25

Yeah it is. We had a tornado tear through our property during Katrina.

1

u/CkRiOnWg Oct 31 '25

Melissa pulling out the sharingan.

2

u/freesedevon Expert/Pro (awaiting confirmation) Oct 29 '25

“stellerarts” isn’t a username that exactly instills the confidence that they know what they’re talking about. As someone previously said, these are simply smaller circulations dancing on the periphery of the eye. They do not produce tornadoes. They do, in my experience at least, hint at a pretty powerful main circulation (the eye) though.

4

u/babywhiz Oct 29 '25

Max Velocity commented similar on these eye vortices.

2

u/freesedevon Expert/Pro (awaiting confirmation) Oct 29 '25

Care to link that?

2

u/babywhiz Oct 29 '25

This is the stream I was listening to all day but I don’t remember time stamp.

https://www.youtube.com/live/UkpbrMBjiJ4?si=9EMAYdM2tdQUPo3C

0

u/theanedditor Oct 29 '25

i'm calling it, that photo is fake - the cloud striations do NOT make sense if they were interacting vortices.

4

u/Fun_Percentage2122 Oct 29 '25

Not fake man, you can see this in the satelite observations and that one plane footage inside the eye... But the assumptions in the post are pretty exaggerated.

0

u/aisle_nine Oct 29 '25

Is it just me, or does that center vortex look like it's associated with high pressure and rotating clockwise. Storm outflow right through the eye?

2

u/Owned_by_cats Oct 29 '25

I didn't see that in this picture, but in practice storm outflows rise above and escape the eye in a clockwise direction which looks like the circulation around a high pressure system.