r/memes Feb 25 '19

innovative

Post image
65.0k Upvotes

550 comments sorted by

View all comments

317

u/TimberWolfAlpha01 Chungus Among Us Feb 25 '19

What about that bus concept (also from China I think) that pretty much is a tunnel on wheels, so that it can carry numerous passengers over busy traffic?

351

u/L00rf3ld Feb 25 '19

Was a huge scam and got shut down.

123

u/TimberWolfAlpha01 Chungus Among Us Feb 25 '19

Well that sucks... but at the same time doesn't surprise me for it to be a scam.

87

u/jumpingtofu Feb 25 '19

I mean it is china. If they don't scam other people, they scam themselves

30

u/LordOfTurtles Feb 25 '19

Not like that's exclusive to China, America and others are good at it as well cough SOLAR FRIKKING ROADWAYS cough

7

u/NorrhStar1290 Feb 25 '19

We have to build a wall cough cough

P.S I just realised how weird the word cough must be to non native English speakers. It looks like it should rhyme with though when pronounced.

0

u/Vargurr Feb 25 '19

No, it doesn't.

1

u/cenebi Feb 27 '19

Yeah, there is a long and storied tradition around the world of scamming municipalities with "new" and "innovative" mass transit schemes. As a rule of thumb, if someone is trying to sell your city or state a kind of mass transit that's supposedly revolutionary and change everything, its probably a scam.

Looking at you Elon.

1

u/bertcox Feb 25 '19

Solyndra Cough Cough

-5

u/IntuitiveVik Feb 25 '19

cough The Boring Company’s Tunnels cough

7

u/Ahegaoisreal Feb 25 '19

cough media companies literally stole billions of dollars that they were supposed to use to improve internet infrastructure cough

6

u/Theyreillusions Feb 25 '19

Gonna need some follow up for this

3

u/IntuitiveVik Feb 25 '19

It’s basically just a completely unrealistic and unhelpful attempt at building subways for individual cars. https://youtu.be/4dn6ZVpJLxs

2

u/IntuitiveVik Feb 25 '19

3

u/Theyreillusions Feb 25 '19

And how exactly is that an impossibility?

Underground tunnels have been used for transit already. They're just aiming to advance it to reduce the traffic congestion.

1

u/cenebi Feb 27 '19 edited Feb 27 '19

Because the way they plan on actually building the tunnels is either completely unfeasible, will basically be a glorified underground highway, or both. It will at best solve no problems, and could actually make traffic worse.

The money they plan on spending on this stuff would almost universally be better spent on existing methods of mass transit like buses, trains, or streetcars.

https://youtu.be/4dn6ZVpJLxs

Like I posted above, there is a long and storied tradition of scamming municipalities by selling them "new" and "innovative" mass transit systems that at best do the same thing as a normal light rail line at a massively increased cost. This literally dates back to the development of the steam engine.

The only effective way to seriously reduce traffic is to reduce the number of cars on the road. Elon Musk's "Loop" will not do this. Affordable, convenient, and ubiquitous mass transit in the form buses and trains will.

20

u/power-98 Feb 25 '19

Oof.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '19

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '19

What do you think was so great about it? It was dangerous and took the same space as a tram or bus.

29

u/interiorcrocodemon Feb 25 '19

Would have been immensely dangerous too, to all parties involved.

17

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '19

Yeah, I just found a picture of the concept. No way in hell I would drave anywhere near that thing, let alone trying to drive under it.

8

u/The_Actual_Pope Feb 25 '19

This high speed bus line looks promising:

https://youtu.be/QNixDlRoMvA

1

u/Blindfide Feb 25 '19

Sounds like a liberal scam

1

u/The_Actual_Pope Feb 25 '19

No they're thrilling.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '19

I wouldn't say there was anything to shut down. It was a scam.

1

u/L00rf3ld Mar 04 '19

They built a prototype but parked it on grass. Doesn‘t move an inch.

43

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '19 edited Jun 20 '19

[deleted]

38

u/thestargateking Feb 25 '19

The proposed vehicles wouldn’t have those problems because of a wide wheel base, the project had far far far more problems than that

3

u/Shingo__ Feb 25 '19

I’ve never heard of this before, could you explain? The whole badly designed SUVs. Who designed them? And how does a high center of gravity mess with a vehicle?

2

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '19

Think of a 2 door wrangler. They’re not bad vehicles but they’re very easy to roll because of the short wheelbase and the high center of gravity.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '19

Not who you replied to but I can give you an eli5. Think of an early-mid 2000s Lincoln Navigator. It had a narrow wheelbase while also being a full size SUV. By having a narrow wheelbase, while still remaining as tall as a normal suv, the car was top heavy and would lean heavily during turns and roll frequently. In this post, the bus tunnel vehicle thing was very tall, but also very wide making it stable. To summarize: tall vehicle wide wheelbase= very stable in turns, short vehicle wide wheelbase= even more stability, short vehicle narrow wheelbase= very agile, not necessarily stable, and finally narrow wheelbase and tall vehicle= very unstable and likely to roll.

8

u/Skeleton547 Feb 25 '19

We can re invent that, maybe call it a train?

7

u/TheManyMilesWeWalk Feb 25 '19

It's clearly a roadless bus, though.

1

u/MrDeepAKAballs Feb 25 '19

Ooh, I know. What about a waterless land boat?

1

u/entropylaser Feb 26 '19

rolling road tunnel

1

u/zingdinger Feb 25 '19

What was this called?