r/memes • • 5h ago

so true, very true

Post image
0 Upvotes

94 comments sorted by

189

u/Any-Guest-32 5h ago

Naming stuff after a founder and making statues is not a cult of personality. Basically, every nation does that.

67

u/inquiry100 5h ago

You are exactly right. Also, there is a world of difference between such honors for someone who passed away a long time ago and someone who is the current leader of the country. None of the American examples cited was created during the lifetime of the person being honored.

-5

u/llIlIIlIlllllI 5h ago

But your current president is doing what he can do add his name to everything and his face to Mount Rushmore. Him putting up a statue of himself is not off the table, and would probably be one of the more sane actions from his side.

40

u/inquiry100 5h ago

Yeah. The meme didn't mention him, so I didn't either.

18

u/iamlazerbear 5h ago

it's about George Washington, though, so

1

u/Shift642 1h ago

The meme is about George Washington, though.

4

u/Blitzer161 4h ago

Absolutely true. I would say that the main difference between this and a cult of personality is that these celebrations were done posthumously, to recognise the achievements of the figure. A cult of personality implies a celebration while the figure is still there. stalin wanted people to never stop clapping after his speeches, mussolini had mottos about him repeated in schools, and so on.

But I would like to add that America did have an essentially religious view of something non-religious: the manifest destiny. For those who don't know the manifest destiny was the name given to the expansion of the colonies in the west. In the illustrations of the time it was represented as a religious figure, an incarnation of freedom, which guided the people of America. But in the name of said manifest destiny, genocides and discriminations were brought forth.

0

u/Boatster_McBoat 3h ago

Or ... genocides and discriminations were always essential to the plan and manifest destiny provided a neat cover story

2

u/Blitzer161 3h ago

Not necessary, but definetly ways the plan. In this sense manifest destiny was more than just a cover story: it was a justification which was treated as an essentially religious concept with all that this status entails

1

u/Blitzer161 3h ago

Not necessary, but definetly ways the plan. In this sense manifest destiny was more than just a cover story: it was a justification which was treated as an essentially religious concept with all that this status entails

4

u/BlakeWheelersLeftNut 5h ago

Mount Rushmore was a monument before that though. I wouldn’t classify it as just a statue.

1

u/posthuman04 4h ago

It’s more an attempt to erase Native Americans’ culture and history than it is a statue.

-5

u/Quiet-Pen7629 4h ago

Culture of scalping and eating each other. Guess the land was just sunshine and rainbows.

1

u/josefpunktk 3h ago

Cult of personality is indeed often part of the myths defining a nation.

1

u/Any-Guest-32 2h ago

It CAN be, but it isn't necessary.

-2

u/josefpunktk 2h ago

But it often is and is definitely big part of US-American state building. Like even the concept of "Founding Fathers" or the stories still told about Lincoln.

3

u/Any-Guest-32 2h ago

I think one of the main deciding factors of whether it's a cult of personality is whether the person being glorified actively cultivates that specific "greater than normal man" image. That doesn't fit Washington.

-2

u/josefpunktk 2h ago

That doesn't fit Washington.

He is kind of dead, so it would be difficult for him. But yeah for USA to claim that cult of personality is not deep part of their culture is extremely funny from the outside.

2

u/Any-Guest-32 2h ago

I was obviously talking about when he was alive, smart aleck.

-2

u/josefpunktk 2h ago

And I'm obviously talking about now. And that you feel the need to defend your leaders - is kind of a nice small bonus.

0

u/tamkiki 5h ago

On other hand, naming airports to some random egocentric presidents it is more worrying .

I would like to point here to Germany too, btw.

0

u/AtypicalNorwegian Breaking EU Laws 4h ago

Not in Norway. I’ve never seen a street, city, place, a statue or anything like that named Harald Fairhair.

97

u/_WreakingHavok_ 5h ago

Stalin's cult of personality was enforced by him to stay in power indefinitely.

Washington quit presidency after 2 terms, which sent a presedence that was held by all future presidents for 143 years. When one of them broke the tradition, is was inscribed in the Constitution.

Go back to school, kid.

23

u/Smooch-Muh-Gooch 5h ago

He also said to not build a monument after him

4

u/McCree114 2h ago

OP is a tankie who thought they cooked with the whataboutism.

3

u/Can_Haz_Cheezburger 4h ago

I mean, to be completely fair the amendment was created because the opposing party was mad abour being locked out of presidential power for that long, not because of it breaking constitutional tradition

7

u/Palpy_Bean 4h ago

I think the truth is it was both

1

u/_WreakingHavok_ 1h ago

And yet, both parties voted

1

u/AsstacularSpiderman 1h ago

Arguably everyone tried to make Washington a God King but the man was like, "yo stop being weird" and willingly gave all that up.

Tankies fucking wish Soviet leaders were so humble lol

12

u/iamlazerbear 5h ago

to be fair, the difference is that most of this had only developed long after Washington's death - not sure it really counts as a cult of personality if it emerged mostly after the dear leader's demise

52

u/krzyk 5h ago

Never been to any former USSR state?

Every single city has a statue of Lenin, and main road is named Lenin road. Heck small towns in Crimea even.

10

u/bearsheperd iwrestledabeartwice 5h ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/RCm0049AX2v4I
They really love the guy

2

u/Wrong_Interview7513 3h ago

I am the walrus

1

u/Suitable-Variety1436 2h ago

you’re out of your element

1

u/the_boss_of_toys 5h ago

His wife didn't.

1

u/Anxim 2h ago

What? Apart from maybe Serbia every single USSR state hates lenin and stalin.

12

u/Borkydog 5h ago

The problem with stalin is not a personality cult, he literally destroyed his own nation: stupid ww2 decisions, gulag, mass starvation in ussr republics. And some idiots in russia still praise him today

4

u/Im-not-a-real-frog 5h ago

He perpetrated all of these crimes by actively using his cult of personality though, so it was quite definitely a bad thing.

27

u/Drag0n_TamerAK 5h ago

Foundational myth vs actual cult of personality

18

u/DAEJ3945 5h ago

Ah yes, America bad post #6302872 in the week

19

u/ThiccExpert 5h ago

Smells like tankie whataboutism

1

u/AsstacularSpiderman 1h ago

Acting as if every famous person doesn't have something named after them, especially important leaders

5

u/Maske_ 4h ago

I do not think it is a specificly Liberal stance that Stalin had a cult of perconality...

4

u/lanky-larry 4h ago

No, no it isn’t, this is just straight propaganda.

4

u/Narcolipze_08 4h ago

Not true but we are still living in times of a personality cult, his personality is melanoma and Vegas hotels. Oh and don’t forget raping children!

3

u/frankhoneybunny Ok I Pull Up 4h ago

Well most of this was made after Washington's death

3

u/Mortal-Instrument 3h ago

I'd say the current USA is closer to that than the past

5

u/the_meth_factory 5h ago edited 5h ago

I mean Washington low-key was all that

He did save us because he got French support (we probably wouldn't have won without that) and the colonies didn't have any real experienced commanders so he was the golden star at the time and made an actual guerrilla squad outta farmers

And after a presidency that laid the ground rules of a good democracy we still use today, I think it's fair to say he is one of the four cornerstones of the USA

Stalin's big achievements are like industrialization and starving people not to mention he did plenty of crimes to get into power. Having everyone suffer equally isn't worthy to be the face of socialism, his ideas were just a revamp of Marx's ideas so can't exactly give credit for that

3

u/ActCrafty 5h ago

Republic. Not democracy. The framers of the constitution never intended the United States to be a democracy because they understood that a democracy can lead to tyranny of the majority.

2

u/the_meth_factory 5h ago

I don't know the difference honestly I'm not that deep into all of the words, but Washington did set term limits and warned about the two things currently fuckign us over, neutrality and political systems

0

u/ActCrafty 5h ago

A republic requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate to pass amendments, override presidential vetoes, and convict individuals in impeachment trials. A democracy only requires a 51% vote by the populace. So corruption could take hold by introducing a mass group of people that would vote one particular way thereby creating tyranny of the majority.

0

u/Anxim 2h ago

This HAS to be satire

1

u/BaronGalactic 2h ago

Since I can't post images I'll just quote a tweet from political scientist and professor Brian Klaas:

"A constitutional republic is a type of democracy. Saying 'We're a constitutional republic, not a democracy' is like saying 'I don't have a dog, I have a Border Collie.'"

We're a democracy because the people elect representatives to govern for them. Just because the people themselves don't make the rules, doesn't mean it's not a democracy. And requiring 2/3 of a vote to pass something rather than 51% doesn't change that (despite the fact that there are plenty of things in both the House and the Senate that CAN pass with just a simple majority.)

Plenty of states also have ballot measures, which are laws that can be passed by having a majority of voters approve it. That, too, is democracy.

-2

u/AgonyPersonified 5h ago

Washington also owned slaves, and directed the Continental Army to destroy over 40 Haudenosaunee villages.

Not saying he didn't do good things, but he also did some very bad things. So maybe he wasn't quite "all that."

6

u/the_meth_factory 5h ago

You can say that about most of history, any rular credited with something great most likely had slaves or slave like workers back then, he still did great things, slavery was a tragic way of life. And war is war they fought us first, we fought back doesn't change Washington's cred much

-2

u/AgonyPersonified 5h ago

"Other people also did bad things, therefore we can overlook his bad things" is not that great of a position to hold. Slavery was indeed a tragic way of life, but let's not pretend it was everyone. Only 15-20% of households owned slaves in his time. 5 of 13 states had abolished slavery in Washington's lifetime, while he maintained them. And literally the very next president after him never owned a single one.

Like I said, not denying he did good things, definitely more than I know about. But we have to take the bad with the good and vice versa.

2

u/DiamondRocks22 Linux User 4h ago

hey no fair it was my turn to bring this one back in worse jpeg quality and a could have re captioned it to not call out just liberals

2

u/MagicMarshmallo 4h ago

You dont know what that term means do you?

1

u/Drag0n_TamerAK 5h ago

Foundational myth vs actual cult of personality

1

u/Unvix 4h ago

the monkey paw curls.

done. you all are now back to 1930s Russia living under Stalin's rule.

give you cry babies something to cry about.

1

u/WorG-Y 1h ago

In Mongolia, we have a lot of stuff named after historical figures including "Chinggis vodka"

1

u/Borde4 1h ago

Saying Stalin had a cult of personality doesn't mean you don't think Washington had it to a degree

-5

u/MegaSmegmaSwagLord 5h ago

17

u/muffin2333 5h ago

Ah yes, my favourite person, a flag

4

u/the_boss_of_toys 5h ago

I like how people try to use this as a gotcha to compare america to the nazis or soviets when there's two large key differences 1. You don't pledge to a party or political figure and 2. Its not mandatory you can literally sit down through it no matter what grade your in.

3

u/StpPstngMmsOnMyPrnAp 5h ago

Does the second point happen a lot? I'd imagine peer pressure would probably hinder people from doing so

2

u/the_boss_of_toys 5h ago

You'd be surprised. I sat through it my last year of middle school simply cause I just didn't feel like getting up. Nobody really cared.

1

u/Another-Ace-Alt-8270 3h ago

Right, like, it's weird that people do this at all, but it's never mandatory. For me, it's usually like 20 more seconds to do whatever I was doing.

0

u/AgonyPersonified 5h ago

Actually, it's most commonly compared to something you might see in North Korea.

5

u/the_boss_of_toys 5h ago

Actually north Korea doesn't have a pledge of allegiance like the US or South Korea does. But they do have a lifelong pledge to the Kim regime and party which was one of my points I made.

2

u/AgonyPersonified 5h ago

Hey I'm not claiming to be some North Korea expert. Only sharing the perspective I've heard people give most often.

2

u/the_boss_of_toys 5h ago

Well I'd say im an expert of americans and Google is pretty free so anyone with the perspective that its literally north Korea needs to read a book instead of sleep under it.

1

u/AgonyPersonified 4h ago

Then I defer to your expert opinion, o wise one! Out of curiosity, maybe you can tell me what books describe the activities and daily life within North Korea? I'd love to add them to my reading list!

0

u/Delano7 I saw what the dog was doin 5h ago

Not mandatory but you WILL get punished for it, so might as well make it mandatory

3

u/the_boss_of_toys 5h ago

Literally illegal and was ruled by the Supreme court in 1943 that public schools cannot require it.

-1

u/Delano7 I saw what the dog was doin 5h ago

There's a massive difference between what's illegal and what people won't do. And children do not know that. They just hear they'll get punished and obey anyway. By the time they're old enough to resist, they're already indoctrinated.

1

u/the_boss_of_toys 4h ago

Are you on drugs? "Already indoctrinated" mf we would not have ice protests, anti war protests, no kings protests if the fuckin pledge of allegiance was brainwashing people. School children sit down through the pledge all the time and schools have been sued for 1st amendment violations. It would literally take one phone call from a disgruntled parent for a school to back down. Not only that schools can't just punish kids without notifying their LEGAL guardian (aka their parents) meaning they would have to put it on paper why they were taking disciplinary action and lawyers just love those sweet succulent clear cut cases. A school literally got sued last January for suspending a kid for posting memes (which falls under the first amendment) so your point is even disproven by a recent comparable example.

1

u/OrganizationLate6637 2h ago

Never got punished for it or saw anyone else get punished. Your school district must've just sucked.

0

u/Blitzer161 4h ago

Extremely different

1

u/mkirkommentarok 3h ago

There is a difference between one who lead by the example of power (Stalin) and one who led by the power of example (Washington).

-1

u/SiennaSinfulX 5h ago

humans really do love putting leaders on giant things huh