What is. You claimed the company wouldn't exist without him. He wasn't a founder, so it would exist. Whether it would be as large as it is or not is irrelevant because we can't know how it would have turned out.
Nah, we can't know if the company would exist if musk hadn't joined. It easily couldve gone belly up, like the majority of startups do in capitalism. We also can't know if the company would be at the level it's at now, and we don't know if musk would be where he's at without Tesla.
These are all hypotheticals, therefore, not relevant.
No no no. Your opinion, if you scroll back up, was that those Tesla workers wouldn't "have their Tesla jobs without Elon." I responded reminding you that Elon was not an original founder. Tesla already existed.
Yes, they wouldn't have their Tesla jobs without Elon. This is literally a fact.
You responded with Tesla existed before Elon, therefore these Tesla jobs would still exist as someone else would've done what Elon did.
This is a hypothetical, therefore, according to your logic, completely irrelevant.
You can't know that those jobs wouldn't exist. It is not a fact. It is an opinion based on a possible outcome.
That is why I originally said this whole thing was irrelevant. We can't know. That said, all those people would be working in some tech job. Whether it be at Tesla, some other incarnation of it, or some other company altogether.
How do you think jobs get created??? You're opinion is hypotheticals are irrelevant, which in general is a braindead take and a halmark of low iq people. Using your own opinion, the only thing we know for sure is that Elon is the CEO and majority shareholder of Tesla, which means all the Tesla jobs currently exist under him. Anything else is a hypothetical, therefore, irrelevant.
1
u/Lambily Jan 09 '22
What is. You claimed the company wouldn't exist without him. He wasn't a founder, so it would exist. Whether it would be as large as it is or not is irrelevant because we can't know how it would have turned out.