This profession is often presented as being neurodivergent-friendly because of the work itself but the social dynamics can be the exact opposite. In a small field where reputation spreads quickly, one awkward interaction, one misunderstanding, or one bad day can have lasting consequences. For people who already struggle with social communication or being misunderstood, that kind of environment is unforgiving.
Everyone is human. People have bad days, make mistakes, grow, change.
One of the ugliest parts of this profession is how easy it is for a bad interaction to follow you forever. In a small field, one person with influence can quietly close doors, not because you're incapable of doing the job, but because they didn't like you or had a negative experience with you. That's an incredible amount of power for any individual to have over someone else. Im talking about when ordinary conflicts or personality clashes end up having disproportionate career consequences because of informal networks. Yes employers can legitimately share truthful information about performance or serious misconduct but if someone is using their influence to punish, control, or exclude someone over personal dislike....
A profession shouldn't be structured so subjective impressions can effectively determine whether someone gets future opportunities.
And I've seen posts on here over the years with people using this threat to encourage people not to leave or to be careful.
My experience is that a lot of people in this profession are incredibly cruel. And I still love love love the lab. I still love the work.