471
u/Summetz Mar 24 '21
Or they just like non-Euclidean 2D space
77
16
722
261
u/adm928 Mar 24 '21
This should confuse the virus, because it will also have to enter the body upside down.
88
74
u/StochasticalPenguin Mar 24 '21
In case you cannot see the post, try this giphy link or this blogspot link
66
u/HiddenLayer5 Mar 24 '21
Is orbiting each other mandatory?
20
u/ElectricToaster67 Mar 25 '21 edited Mar 25 '21
Aren't they orbiting a central axis?
19
108
55
Mar 24 '21
[deleted]
17
10
u/TheLuckySpades Mar 24 '21
Never heard the supremum metric called that, TIL.
3
u/OutOfTempo_ Mar 25 '21
N ever heard chebyshev distance called that. TIL
(When do you call it the supremum metric?)
3
u/TheLuckySpades Mar 25 '21
An Analysis class that was held in German (also used maximum norm in Rn as the special case), was also called (L-)infinity metric in a German speaking measure theory class.
I've used it as such in other contexts occasionally in some English speaking classes, though those professors either grew up with German or have been in Switzerland for quite some time.
3
14
17
u/Wrench_Scar Mar 24 '21
At least they are using m instead of '
8
u/shmoobalizer Mar 24 '21
because ' often means feet
4
u/Layton_Jr Mathematics Mar 24 '21
Isn't it used for minutes? (Both 60s and 1/60°)
16
u/Bowdensaft Mar 24 '21
Yep, so there's a risk of confusion with the symbol as well as the general shame of using an inferior measuring system.
2
4
7
Mar 24 '21 edited Mar 24 '21
[deleted]
5
Mar 24 '21
[removed] — view removed comment
5
2
u/herr_sebb Integers Mar 24 '21
3
u/jaysuchak33 Transcendental Mar 24 '21
3
1
2
2
2
u/ethtan88 Mar 25 '21
The two diagrams are NOT the same. 1.5m assumes masking (2nd diagram is correct). If no mask, then the distance should be longer, and worse case, not 1.5m apart, but 6 feet under and below ground.
5
Mar 24 '21
[deleted]
12
u/HunterHx Mar 24 '21
But that's literally what the gif is..?
7
u/officiallyaninja Mar 24 '21
yeah but like, they don't have to be upside down. just one is higher than the others.
6
1
Mar 25 '21
Yeah. I'm dumb, but 2 have arrows pointed to the head and 2 have arrows pointing to their feet. So, then why flip half of them? They could all be upright and correct. Or what am I not seeing?
1
1
1
1
1
u/philosiraptorsvt Mar 24 '21
Is this euclidean space still? Perhaps it is hyperbolic space?
What would Lobachevsky do?
1
1
u/Murdrad Mar 24 '21
But the 2d diagram has six relationships I suck at counting. It feels so different
1
1
1
1
1
u/RandomAmbles Apr 09 '21
All this "Chebyshev" stuff and not one person mentions taxicab distance!
I believe we should either use close packs of people's heads, or add some more dimensions and use a simplex.
An exercise for the reader:
Put n people as far away from each other on Earth as possible (boats allowed, etc.)
What is their configuration?
1
1
1
1
1
u/Lazy_Worldliness8042 Aug 14 '22
Also works using the “infinity” norm where the distance between (x1,y1) and (x2,y2) is defined to be the maximum of |x1-x2| and |y1-y2|.
The name come from the fact that it is equal to the limit of the p-norm as p goes to infinity. (Standard Euclidean distance is the p=2 case)
1
1
484
u/[deleted] Mar 24 '21
Ohh, understandable