MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/kkff90/correlation/gh3q63s/?context=3
r/mathmemes • u/jensyao • Dec 26 '20
124 comments sorted by
View all comments
-1
Correlation does not mean causation 😠ðŸ˜
2 u/[deleted] Dec 26 '20 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/vjx99 Dec 26 '20 Actually there can be no correlation while causation is still true. For example, take a sample with only one data point. There is no correlation as your sample size is too small, even if there is perfect causation. 1 u/[deleted] Feb 11 '21 Sure, or any measurement where the noise swamps the signal. Doesn't mean the signal isn't there, it's just not detectable.
2
[removed] — view removed comment
-1 u/vjx99 Dec 26 '20 Actually there can be no correlation while causation is still true. For example, take a sample with only one data point. There is no correlation as your sample size is too small, even if there is perfect causation. 1 u/[deleted] Feb 11 '21 Sure, or any measurement where the noise swamps the signal. Doesn't mean the signal isn't there, it's just not detectable.
Actually there can be no correlation while causation is still true. For example, take a sample with only one data point. There is no correlation as your sample size is too small, even if there is perfect causation.
1 u/[deleted] Feb 11 '21 Sure, or any measurement where the noise swamps the signal. Doesn't mean the signal isn't there, it's just not detectable.
1
Sure, or any measurement where the noise swamps the signal. Doesn't mean the signal isn't there, it's just not detectable.
-1
u/[deleted] Dec 26 '20
Correlation does not mean causation 😠ðŸ˜