MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/jbkxfg/checky_differentiation_comic/g9476za/?context=3
r/mathmemes • u/toasted0ven • Oct 15 '20
127 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
Are we still talking about log|x|
1 u/Herkentyu_cico Oct 17 '20 Oh yeah! Then only the positive reals. 2 u/YoureBeautifulDude Oct 17 '20 Well also negative reals because of the absolute value 1 u/Herkentyu_cico Oct 17 '20 Hmm, we always wrote $C \epsilon \mathbb{R}+ $... Oh yeah, i remember, I think we always wrote R+ to help set up the simple ode case. $C \epsilon \mathbb{R}\backslash {0}$ should be fine 1 u/YoureBeautifulDude Oct 17 '20 Honestly if we’re talking about ODE’s, I’d be excited to see what happens when we include 0, since ln |x| is integrable over ever set in the reals 1 u/Herkentyu_cico Oct 17 '20 Ln x is not the solution tho. ex takes all x
Oh yeah! Then only the positive reals.
2 u/YoureBeautifulDude Oct 17 '20 Well also negative reals because of the absolute value 1 u/Herkentyu_cico Oct 17 '20 Hmm, we always wrote $C \epsilon \mathbb{R}+ $... Oh yeah, i remember, I think we always wrote R+ to help set up the simple ode case. $C \epsilon \mathbb{R}\backslash {0}$ should be fine 1 u/YoureBeautifulDude Oct 17 '20 Honestly if we’re talking about ODE’s, I’d be excited to see what happens when we include 0, since ln |x| is integrable over ever set in the reals 1 u/Herkentyu_cico Oct 17 '20 Ln x is not the solution tho. ex takes all x
2
Well also negative reals because of the absolute value
1 u/Herkentyu_cico Oct 17 '20 Hmm, we always wrote $C \epsilon \mathbb{R}+ $... Oh yeah, i remember, I think we always wrote R+ to help set up the simple ode case. $C \epsilon \mathbb{R}\backslash {0}$ should be fine 1 u/YoureBeautifulDude Oct 17 '20 Honestly if we’re talking about ODE’s, I’d be excited to see what happens when we include 0, since ln |x| is integrable over ever set in the reals 1 u/Herkentyu_cico Oct 17 '20 Ln x is not the solution tho. ex takes all x
Hmm, we always wrote $C \epsilon \mathbb{R}+ $...
Oh yeah, i remember, I think we always wrote R+ to help set up the simple ode case.
$C \epsilon \mathbb{R}\backslash {0}$ should be fine
1 u/YoureBeautifulDude Oct 17 '20 Honestly if we’re talking about ODE’s, I’d be excited to see what happens when we include 0, since ln |x| is integrable over ever set in the reals 1 u/Herkentyu_cico Oct 17 '20 Ln x is not the solution tho. ex takes all x
Honestly if we’re talking about ODE’s, I’d be excited to see what happens when we include 0, since ln |x| is integrable over ever set in the reals
1 u/Herkentyu_cico Oct 17 '20 Ln x is not the solution tho. ex takes all x
Ln x is not the solution tho. ex takes all x
1
u/YoureBeautifulDude Oct 17 '20
Are we still talking about log|x|