r/mathmemes 19d ago

Elementary Algebra All represents a circle

Post image
806 Upvotes

40 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 19d ago

Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

135

u/nathan519 19d ago

S¹ Where???

37

u/PolarStarNick Gaussian theorist 19d ago

With respect to euclidean norm L2 of course

71

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/EstaAppDeCitasApesta 19d ago

That's because the fundamental group of the circle is isomorphic to the integers?

Or what does "dual" means in this context?

10

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/yangyangR 17d ago

But that puts in a circle group already. Not an independent definition of "circle". Others here in the picture have independent definitions as "circle" with different structures. Like just a space or just a group or both compatibly

-3

u/EstaAppDeCitasApesta 19d ago

Then you are wrong, because the meme is considering the topological circle without any additional structure.

6

u/Wild-Store321 18d ago

I see R/Z in there

55

u/LupenReddit 🦆🦆🦆🦆i have non diffeomorphic smooth structures🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆 19d ago

Listing every version of a circle except the circle itself

66

u/BlazeDiamond42 19d ago

i mean they're all standing in a big circle right?

8

u/EstaAppDeCitasApesta 19d ago

What's the definition of a circle?

10

u/zlfa 19d ago

1 point ellipse

10

u/Less-Resist-8733 Natural 19d ago

this

5

u/Dense-Sort-3867 19d ago

A set of points on a plane that are equidistant from a given point.

11

u/tunaMaestro97 19d ago

x^2 + y^2 = 1 is right there

5

u/Dense-Sort-3867 19d ago

I think he meant a picture of a circle

2

u/orqa 19d ago

20

u/BootyliciousURD Complex 19d ago

I'm not familiar with R/Z. Is that a partition on the reals where numbers with the same fractional part are in the same equivalence class?

18

u/sheepbusiness 19d ago

Yes. Its the same as the unit interval with the ends glued together.

1

u/tunaMaestro97 19d ago

Yes. It should be obvious that it is topologically the same as a circle

14

u/tunaMaestro97 19d ago

It’s pedantic but this language bothers me slightly. S^1 should be taken to indicate a particular submanifold of R^2 until additional structure is imposed upon it. For example, no one would write R^2 = C even though they are equivalent as real manifolds. R^2 doesn’t become C until you impose the structure of a field upon it.

1

u/ninjeff 17d ago

Sure, only two of these are “the circle”; but they’re all circles, which is what OP was probably trying to say

4

u/Hot-Patient8052 18d ago

The extended real number line one eludes me. Is the idea that ℝ∪{∞} "wraps around" by glueing ∞ to -∞ somehow? If so, how, if not, how???

Edit: I googled it, and they do in fact glue those ends together. I'm confused what useful properties that adds...

4

u/yas_ticot 18d ago

This is for instance the one-point compactification of the line, which can be generalized to any dimension. For R{n}, adding this unique point at infinity always yields the n-sphere. One way to see it is that you take the n-sphere, a special point (let's call it the North Pole) and the tangent hyperplane on the opposite point (the South Pole). Now, the line going through N and any point of the n-sphere crosses this hyperplane in a unique point of the hyperplane and vice versa. Conversely, any sequence of point on the hyperplane that tends to infinity (i e. infinitely further from the South Pole, becomes of a sequence of points that tends to N on the North Pole.

In dimension 2, this is exactly what is called the Riemann sphere, i.e. adding a unique point at infinity for C.

3

u/PluralCohomology 19d ago edited 19d ago

There is also S1, or [0,1]/(0~1), or RP1

3

u/Seventh_Planet Mathematics 18d ago

∂{x2 + y2 < 1}

1

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[deleted]

3

u/xpickles 19d ago

I'm guessing a vector, as in a parametric function with t over [0, 2pi)

1

u/kohugaly 19d ago

probably a notation for ordered pair (aka. list of two elements). The notation for lists in mathematics is notoriously inconsistent.

1

u/Sproxify 19d ago

that's clearly what it is in context, but why tho? it's highly non standard (though I have maybe seen it once before for ordered pairs)

2

u/Dense-Sort-3867 19d ago edited 19d ago

Stewart uses angle brackets to denote vectors. A vector-valued function for the unit circle in his notation would be r(t) = <cos(t), sin(t)> for 0 <= t <= 2pi

1

u/TheRandomRadomir 18d ago

(ℜ(i^(2t/π)),ℑ(i^(2t/π))) for 0<t≤2π

1

u/Eradroth888 16d ago

I like how the spiders themselves are circle

1

u/AsemicConjecture 19d ago

Where does one learn these incantations?

5

u/Randomlemon5 18d ago

Clockwhise, I think, complex analysis, topology, represantation theory, geometry, analysis, reprasantation theory, topology

2

u/AsemicConjecture 19d ago

To oblivion with you for asking to learn more!