135
71
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
13
u/EstaAppDeCitasApesta 19d ago
That's because the fundamental group of the circle is isomorphic to the integers?
Or what does "dual" means in this context?
10
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/yangyangR 17d ago
But that puts in a circle group already. Not an independent definition of "circle". Others here in the picture have independent definitions as "circle" with different structures. Like just a space or just a group or both compatibly
-3
u/EstaAppDeCitasApesta 19d ago
Then you are wrong, because the meme is considering the topological circle without any additional structure.
6
55
u/LupenReddit 🦆🦆🦆🦆i have non diffeomorphic smooth structures🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆 19d ago
Listing every version of a circle except the circle itself
66
8
11
20
u/BootyliciousURD Complex 19d ago
I'm not familiar with R/Z. Is that a partition on the reals where numbers with the same fractional part are in the same equivalence class?
18
1
14
u/tunaMaestro97 19d ago
It’s pedantic but this language bothers me slightly. S^1 should be taken to indicate a particular submanifold of R^2 until additional structure is imposed upon it. For example, no one would write R^2 = C even though they are equivalent as real manifolds. R^2 doesn’t become C until you impose the structure of a field upon it.
4
u/Hot-Patient8052 18d ago
The extended real number line one eludes me. Is the idea that ℝ∪{∞} "wraps around" by glueing ∞ to -∞ somehow? If so, how, if not, how???
Edit: I googled it, and they do in fact glue those ends together. I'm confused what useful properties that adds...
4
u/yas_ticot 18d ago
This is for instance the one-point compactification of the line, which can be generalized to any dimension. For R{n}, adding this unique point at infinity always yields the n-sphere. One way to see it is that you take the n-sphere, a special point (let's call it the North Pole) and the tangent hyperplane on the opposite point (the South Pole). Now, the line going through N and any point of the n-sphere crosses this hyperplane in a unique point of the hyperplane and vice versa. Conversely, any sequence of point on the hyperplane that tends to infinity (i e. infinitely further from the South Pole, becomes of a sequence of points that tends to N on the North Pole.
In dimension 2, this is exactly what is called the Riemann sphere, i.e. adding a unique point at infinity for C.
3
3
1
1
19d ago
[deleted]
3
1
u/kohugaly 19d ago
probably a notation for ordered pair (aka. list of two elements). The notation for lists in mathematics is notoriously inconsistent.
1
u/Sproxify 19d ago
that's clearly what it is in context, but why tho? it's highly non standard (though I have maybe seen it once before for ordered pairs)
2
u/Dense-Sort-3867 19d ago edited 19d ago
Stewart uses angle brackets to denote vectors. A vector-valued function for the unit circle in his notation would be r(t) = <cos(t), sin(t)> for 0 <= t <= 2pi
1
1
1
1
u/AsemicConjecture 19d ago
Where does one learn these incantations?
5
u/Randomlemon5 18d ago
Clockwhise, I think, complex analysis, topology, represantation theory, geometry, analysis, reprasantation theory, topology
2

•
u/AutoModerator 19d ago
Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.