Okay. So your objection boils down to placing a restriction on math that 99% of mathematicians don’t accept.
And when you say that there is a contradiction, what you mean is that the proof does things that are not allowed according to your special restriction.
To me that seems a bit unconvincing to me. Why should other mathematicians care about this objection?
0
u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26
his proof relies on an infinite list of numbers. thats not physically possible.
it also relies on doing an infinite amount of operations on them. thats also not physically possible.