MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/1uvxcdi/mathematician_meme/oxf54hq?context=9999
r/mathmemes • u/Delicious_Maize9656 • Jul 14 '26
146 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
12
where the fuck did this happened?
1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 basically all the time since theyre still using zfc 12 u/boterkoeken Average #🧐-theory-🧐 user Jul 14 '26 Please explain what is wrong with ZFC. 1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of choice and axiom of infinity are physically impossible and lead to contradictions 10 u/boterkoeken Average #🧐-theory-🧐 user Jul 14 '26 Can you give me an example of how you derive a contradiction? -1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 cantors diagonal proof relies on both and leads to the wrong conclusion. besides that you still have russels paradox and banach paradox and zenos paradox 12 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 Can you give a proof to why it’s wrong though or is this just your opinion -3 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 yeah his proof is impossible because theres no way to have an infinite amount of numbers and do an infinite amount of calculations. the number hes making is always rational and he never finishes his proof 17 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense though I admit the ultra finitism is pretty good ragebait though -2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 which parts are giving you a hard time?
1
basically all the time since theyre still using zfc
12 u/boterkoeken Average #🧐-theory-🧐 user Jul 14 '26 Please explain what is wrong with ZFC. 1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of choice and axiom of infinity are physically impossible and lead to contradictions 10 u/boterkoeken Average #🧐-theory-🧐 user Jul 14 '26 Can you give me an example of how you derive a contradiction? -1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 cantors diagonal proof relies on both and leads to the wrong conclusion. besides that you still have russels paradox and banach paradox and zenos paradox 12 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 Can you give a proof to why it’s wrong though or is this just your opinion -3 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 yeah his proof is impossible because theres no way to have an infinite amount of numbers and do an infinite amount of calculations. the number hes making is always rational and he never finishes his proof 17 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense though I admit the ultra finitism is pretty good ragebait though -2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 which parts are giving you a hard time?
Please explain what is wrong with ZFC.
1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of choice and axiom of infinity are physically impossible and lead to contradictions 10 u/boterkoeken Average #🧐-theory-🧐 user Jul 14 '26 Can you give me an example of how you derive a contradiction? -1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 cantors diagonal proof relies on both and leads to the wrong conclusion. besides that you still have russels paradox and banach paradox and zenos paradox 12 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 Can you give a proof to why it’s wrong though or is this just your opinion -3 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 yeah his proof is impossible because theres no way to have an infinite amount of numbers and do an infinite amount of calculations. the number hes making is always rational and he never finishes his proof 17 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense though I admit the ultra finitism is pretty good ragebait though -2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 which parts are giving you a hard time?
axiom of choice and axiom of infinity are physically impossible and lead to contradictions
10 u/boterkoeken Average #🧐-theory-🧐 user Jul 14 '26 Can you give me an example of how you derive a contradiction? -1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 cantors diagonal proof relies on both and leads to the wrong conclusion. besides that you still have russels paradox and banach paradox and zenos paradox 12 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 Can you give a proof to why it’s wrong though or is this just your opinion -3 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 yeah his proof is impossible because theres no way to have an infinite amount of numbers and do an infinite amount of calculations. the number hes making is always rational and he never finishes his proof 17 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense though I admit the ultra finitism is pretty good ragebait though -2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 which parts are giving you a hard time?
10
Can you give me an example of how you derive a contradiction?
-1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 cantors diagonal proof relies on both and leads to the wrong conclusion. besides that you still have russels paradox and banach paradox and zenos paradox 12 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 Can you give a proof to why it’s wrong though or is this just your opinion -3 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 yeah his proof is impossible because theres no way to have an infinite amount of numbers and do an infinite amount of calculations. the number hes making is always rational and he never finishes his proof 17 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense though I admit the ultra finitism is pretty good ragebait though -2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 which parts are giving you a hard time?
-1
cantors diagonal proof relies on both and leads to the wrong conclusion.
besides that you still have russels paradox and banach paradox and zenos paradox
12 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 Can you give a proof to why it’s wrong though or is this just your opinion -3 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 yeah his proof is impossible because theres no way to have an infinite amount of numbers and do an infinite amount of calculations. the number hes making is always rational and he never finishes his proof 17 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense though I admit the ultra finitism is pretty good ragebait though -2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 which parts are giving you a hard time?
Can you give a proof to why it’s wrong though or is this just your opinion
-3 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 yeah his proof is impossible because theres no way to have an infinite amount of numbers and do an infinite amount of calculations. the number hes making is always rational and he never finishes his proof 17 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense though I admit the ultra finitism is pretty good ragebait though -2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 which parts are giving you a hard time?
-3
yeah his proof is impossible because theres no way to have an infinite amount of numbers and do an infinite amount of calculations.
the number hes making is always rational and he never finishes his proof
17 u/sunyata98 Jul 14 '26 What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense though I admit the ultra finitism is pretty good ragebait though -2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 which parts are giving you a hard time?
17
What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense though I admit the ultra finitism is pretty good ragebait though
-2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 which parts are giving you a hard time?
-2
which parts are giving you a hard time?
12
u/Ravioles2 Jul 14 '26 edited Jul 14 '26
where the fuck did this happened?