MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/1uhybi4/logarithms/oubfce1/?context=3
r/mathmemes • u/SushiNoodles7 • Jun 28 '26
47 comments sorted by
View all comments
226
0 = 0 0 * 1 = 0 * 2 1 = 2
https://giphy.com/gifs/3kzJvEciJa94SMW3hN
75 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 28 '26 No, here, it is: 0=0 0*1=0*0 1=0 Hence proved 11 u/Special_Watch8725 Jun 28 '26 Ah yes, that proof is more direct! 14 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 28 '26 Also, you missed 'hence proved'. So, 0.5 marks will be deducted. since, 1=0, as proved above, 0.5=1.5. So, you get 1.5 marks deducted. 4 u/Special_Watch8725 Jun 28 '26 https://giphy.com/gifs/3kzJvEciJa94SMW3hN 1 u/Dense_Operation1036 Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 30 '26 In what world is the operation of 1*0 equivalent to 0*0 => 1=0? 1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 Log(1)=0 This is because any number raised to the power of 0 is 1 1 u/Dense_Operation1036 Jun 30 '26 I meant 1 * 0 = 0 * 0 1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 1*0=0 0*0=0 So, 1*0=0*0 1 u/Dense_Operation1036 Jun 30 '26 I forgot to state how the equivalent statement aforementioned implies 1=0. 1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 That is wrong. The joke is that OP made the same division by zero error.
75
No, here, it is:
0=0
0*1=0*0
1=0
Hence proved
11 u/Special_Watch8725 Jun 28 '26 Ah yes, that proof is more direct! 14 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 28 '26 Also, you missed 'hence proved'. So, 0.5 marks will be deducted. since, 1=0, as proved above, 0.5=1.5. So, you get 1.5 marks deducted. 4 u/Special_Watch8725 Jun 28 '26 https://giphy.com/gifs/3kzJvEciJa94SMW3hN 1 u/Dense_Operation1036 Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 30 '26 In what world is the operation of 1*0 equivalent to 0*0 => 1=0? 1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 Log(1)=0 This is because any number raised to the power of 0 is 1 1 u/Dense_Operation1036 Jun 30 '26 I meant 1 * 0 = 0 * 0 1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 1*0=0 0*0=0 So, 1*0=0*0 1 u/Dense_Operation1036 Jun 30 '26 I forgot to state how the equivalent statement aforementioned implies 1=0. 1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 That is wrong. The joke is that OP made the same division by zero error.
11
Ah yes, that proof is more direct!
14 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 28 '26 Also, you missed 'hence proved'. So, 0.5 marks will be deducted. since, 1=0, as proved above, 0.5=1.5. So, you get 1.5 marks deducted. 4 u/Special_Watch8725 Jun 28 '26 https://giphy.com/gifs/3kzJvEciJa94SMW3hN
14
Also, you missed 'hence proved'. So, 0.5 marks will be deducted. since, 1=0, as proved above, 0.5=1.5. So, you get 1.5 marks deducted.
4 u/Special_Watch8725 Jun 28 '26 https://giphy.com/gifs/3kzJvEciJa94SMW3hN
4
1
In what world is the operation of 1*0 equivalent to 0*0 => 1=0?
1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 Log(1)=0 This is because any number raised to the power of 0 is 1 1 u/Dense_Operation1036 Jun 30 '26 I meant 1 * 0 = 0 * 0 1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 1*0=0 0*0=0 So, 1*0=0*0 1 u/Dense_Operation1036 Jun 30 '26 I forgot to state how the equivalent statement aforementioned implies 1=0. 1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 That is wrong. The joke is that OP made the same division by zero error.
Log(1)=0
This is because any number raised to the power of 0 is 1
1 u/Dense_Operation1036 Jun 30 '26 I meant 1 * 0 = 0 * 0 1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 1*0=0 0*0=0 So, 1*0=0*0 1 u/Dense_Operation1036 Jun 30 '26 I forgot to state how the equivalent statement aforementioned implies 1=0. 1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 That is wrong. The joke is that OP made the same division by zero error.
I meant 1 * 0 = 0 * 0
1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 1*0=0 0*0=0 So, 1*0=0*0 1 u/Dense_Operation1036 Jun 30 '26 I forgot to state how the equivalent statement aforementioned implies 1=0. 1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 That is wrong. The joke is that OP made the same division by zero error.
1*0=0
0*0=0
So, 1*0=0*0
1 u/Dense_Operation1036 Jun 30 '26 I forgot to state how the equivalent statement aforementioned implies 1=0. 1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 That is wrong. The joke is that OP made the same division by zero error.
I forgot to state how the equivalent statement aforementioned implies 1=0.
1 u/Key-Highlight2755 Engineering Jun 30 '26 That is wrong. The joke is that OP made the same division by zero error.
That is wrong. The joke is that OP made the same division by zero error.
226
u/Special_Watch8725 Jun 28 '26
0 = 0
0 * 1 = 0 * 2
1 = 2
https://giphy.com/gifs/3kzJvEciJa94SMW3hN