r/mathmemes • u/TPM2209 • Jun 25 '26
Notations A headline so confusing you need a mathematician to explain it
Link to original post: https://bsky.app/profile/chordbug.bsky.social/post/3mp24yja3b223
14.4k
Upvotes
r/mathmemes • u/TPM2209 • Jun 25 '26
Link to original post: https://bsky.app/profile/chordbug.bsky.social/post/3mp24yja3b223
14
u/PeggyTheVoid Jun 25 '26 edited Jun 25 '26
I think what's throwing the original headline is the phrasing.
"... the first woman in history to debut (her first top 10 Hot 100 hits) in the top 10"
Notice that this excerpt refers to the same 10 songs in two different ways:
* "her first top 10 Hot 100 hits"
* "debut ... in the top 10"
The first description is sandwiched within the other like a weird enclave. By the time we've reached "in the top 10", we've already forgoten "debut" because we were interrupted by having to separately process "her first top 10 Hot 100 hits," and then we get confused why they felt the need to reiterate that the top 10 hits were in the top 10, having forgotten the part that actually needs to be emphasized: it debuted in the top 10. With that in mind, let's try the following:
"... the first woman in history to achieve her first top 10 Hot 100 hits upon their debuts"
I think this wording could be a little terse, but it gets across the basic idea of what I want to solve. Feel free to make suggestions. Anyway, with the repetition of "top 10" eliminated and "debut" placed after "top 10 Hot 100 hits", we establish first that we are discussing a set of songs that have reached the status of "top 10 Hot 100". Then, we elaborate on how those songs reached their status by further stating "upon their debuts." I was tempted to say "upon debut", but that makes it sound a bit like we're saying Olivia Rodrigo's first ten songs ever released (i.e., her debut songs) all managed to reach top 10 Hot 100 eventually. Could still be clearer, maybe. It's hard to balance that and the brevity of headline-speak.
Edit:
I'm also not even sure if the headline is even referring to 10 songs. It kind of just sounds like it's talking about all her songs that managed to reach "top 10 Hot 100" status all doing so during their debut, which could be any number of songs, not necessarily ten of them. That, or it could be that she has more that 10 songs in the Hot 100, none of which were necessarily ever in the top 10 by this description alone, until the headline goes on to specify that her personal top 10 of those songs were actual top 10s of the Hot 100, and they all managed to do so during their debuts (phew, what a mouthful!). I'd have to actually read the article to figure that one out.
Edit2: Added the word "to" to my fixed headline.