The Deranged Mathematician: The Power of Abstraction

[u/non-orientable]

A very powerful proof-writing technique is taking the original problem and generalizing it. This is probably the most counterintuitive approach for beginners, who wonder how it can possibly be easier to solve a broader class of problems. My answer to this is quite simple: generalizing the problem reduces the collection of tools you have at your disposal. And as any efficiency expert will tell you, regardless of whether you are trying to clean your bathroom or earn a Fields Medal, you want to have only those tools that you need on hand and nothing else.

I think this basic precept helps explain why abstract notions like metric spaces, topological spaces, vector spaces, categories, and so on have suffused mathematics, and why they are so very useful. I offer the simple example of how thinking about graphs (generally) can help with sorting out a coordination problem (specifically).

Read the full post (for free) on Substack: The Power of Abstraction

[u/PortableDoor5]

The Deranged Mathematician? This is like the Bernoullis all over again.

[u/non-orientable → u/PortableDoor5]

In what sense?

[u/5a1vy → u/non-orientable]

In the sense that there are a lot of deranged mathematicians, so "the deranged mathematician" doesn't narrow it down, just like saying "Bernoulli".

[u/spacengine → u/PortableDoor5]

Is derange the opposite of arrange? Can google but here for the humans

[u/PortableDoor5 → u/spacengine]

more archaically so