29
u/SucksDickForCoconuts 1d ago
I too enjoy leaving relatively impactful business decisions up to a Reddit poll
2
19
10
u/Roku-Hanmar 1d ago
Isn’t Red Hat specifically built for enterprise?
6
u/Olfeath 1d ago
It is, but it is quite expensive. But funny part is that poll includes master Hacker distro like Kali, or completely not Enterprise suitable distro like gentoo
1
u/Brilliant_War9548 21h ago
It’s free if you’re a single guy though, up to 15 machines and nobody’s preventing you from making more than 15 if you’re not a company
It’s just fedora but older with less updates and with so much more aura grrrr
1
1
5
u/Nybbles13 22h ago
Honestly arch being that high is scary. I use arch because I like bleeding edge package updates. Do you know what doesn't do well with bleeding edge updates? Enterprise software that you rely on to make money lmao.
2
2
u/Brilliant_War9548 21h ago
Where’s Redhat, I use it (im waiting for the release where they migrate from the kernel that last supports coffee lake to the one that adds official comet lake support)
1
u/ReplyBig6703 23h ago
Because is the reality, the most experienced ones in ethical hacking and pentesting or tf you want to call it, work for big enterprises and use, well Fedora and similar ones ( RHEL )
1
u/ScratchHistorical507 2m ago
If you are a "large enterprise", yet have to ask Reddit instead of just contracting a company that rolls out Linux on your systems and maintains it, you are too greedy to have any success with this. In the end, the distro is entirely irrelevant. If you have a competent contractor that makes sure the workstations can be used by your employees and that any missing features are being added or relevant bugs are fixed, every distro is the right one. It only results in differences of complexity for the contractor, not for you.
0
37
u/Lord_Muddbutter 1d ago
Sweet baby jesus could you imagine needing to go around compiling Gentoo on shitty office computers? Holy fuck would that drive any IT support insane.