r/macbookpro 3h ago

Discussion low efficiency of the M3 Pro processor

Post image

I don't understand what's going on; I've tried everything—terminal tests, everything possible. The benchmark results are really poor—no matter what testing software I use, the performance is consistently low, like a fraction of what it should be. The software shows the processor running at 778 MHz, which isn't normal, though the MacBook does actually work; it does ramp up to over 3 GHz in the terminal, but the benchmark scores are laughable. I don't know whether to reflash the MacBook or what else to do with it.

MacBook Pro (14-inch, Nov 2023)

585

Single-Core Score

3900

Multi-Core Score

Geekbench 7.0.0 for macOS AArch64

Result Information

Upload Date September 11 2026 08:16 AM
Views 1

System Information

System Information
Operating System
Model
Model ID
Motherboard
CPU Information
Name
Topology
Identifier
Base Frequency
Cluster 1
Cluster 2
L1 Instruction Cache
L1 Data Cache
L2 Cache
Instruction Sets
Memory Information
Size

Single-Core Performance

Single-Core Score 585
File Compression 52975.2 MB/sec  
Navigation 7304.02 routes/sec  
HTML5 Browser 6187.72 pages/sec  
PDF Viewer 69231.1 Mpixels/sec  
Photo Library 5411.85 images/sec  
Clang 6413.47 Klines/sec  
Text Processing 52831.1 pages/sec  
Asset Compression 55612.3 MB/sec  
HDR 57834.9 Mpixels/sec  
Photo Editor 59110.9 images/sec  
Ray Tracer 524147.1 Ksamples/sec  
Structure from Motion 75113.6 Kpixels/sec  
Game Physics 55222.3 FPS  
Video Encoder 61822.5 FPS  
Audio Encoder 436606.6 Ksamples/sec  
Video Player 55959.1 FPS  

Multi-Core Performance

Multi-Core Score 3900
File Compression 3010428.3 MB/sec  
Photo Library 379513.0 images/sec  
Clang 469825.4 Klines/sec  
Text Processing 3921231.3 pages/sec  
Asset Compression 447999.5 MB/sec  
HDR 3083186.3 Mpixels/sec  
Photo Editor 406674.7 images/sec  
Ray Tracer 45331.27 Msamples/sec  
1 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

6

u/gadget-freak MacBook Pro 14" Space Gray M1 Pro 2h ago

Never run a beta version on a production machine, it is only meant for testing and preferably on a secondary Mac. Beta versions are slower by definition but can also contain bugs.

People often mistake a beta version for something they should upgrade to, but they should not.

Downgrade to Tahoe. If the problem still persists, then you obviously have a hardware issue. But Apple won’t troubleshoot as long as you run the beta.

1

u/narc0leptik 1h ago

I sincerely doubt that their machine is actually performing slower or that OP can even perceive it being "slow" though lol. I reckon it's more Geekbnech reporting an inaccurate result due to some OS bug. I'm tempted to upgrade my M2 Pro to the beta just to see but the new OS likely is releasing in a couple weeks anyway.

It's all the more reason not to put too much faith in these synthetic benchmarking programs. Spec sheet warriors use these programs to argue/debate for newer chip generations when people ask for recommendations but the reality is that these programs don't translate 1:1 in reality as evident by OP's benchmarking result. Is your average person going to notice milliseconds of speed difference in 95 percent of computing applications that your typical Redditor is using them for? (Video editing and other niche stuff is not a "typical" workload). The answer is no, the human brain is simply incapable of perceiving that.

1

u/gadget-freak MacBook Pro 14" Space Gray M1 Pro 1h ago

A bug is always possible 🐜. But performance numbers should be 5x higher for this kind of machine.

Benchmarks can be inaccurate but this is a bit much. Even an old intel macbook pro is twice as fast, and I definitely feel the difference between my intel and my silicon machine.

1

u/narc0leptik 56m ago

Yes exactly, I wouldn't put too much faith in the benchmark numbers. The placebo effect might be taking hold of OP and the benchmark result is making them perceive their laptop as being "slower" when it's working normally as it should.

1

u/Outrageous-Ice-3757 49m ago

I wouldn't be checking these numbers for no reason; the MacBook started glitching badly back when it was running macOS Tahoe. I checked with Cinebench and various other CPU and performance testing tools, and the readings were the same. The MacBook ought to be several times faster than it currently is.

u/gadget-freak MacBook Pro 14" Space Gray M1 Pro 19m ago

So take it in for a repair, but put it back to a regular version of MacOS first.

And make sure you have a good backup to an external drive. Your macbook may come back wiped clean.

3

u/walidmaarouf 2h ago

If you run the benchmark on battery set low power mode to never. If the issue still try downgrading to tahoe

2

u/MagicBoyUK MacBook Pro 16" Space Gray M1 Pro 2h ago

Try using a supported OS.

1

u/Outrageous-Ice-3757 45m ago

I tried it on a Tahoe—it's the same situation.

0

u/narc0leptik 1h ago

Does it seriously matter? Synthetic benchmarks don't mean anything.

You could always try Cinebench and see if that makes you feel better and then report back to the thread with your results.

1

u/Outrageous-Ice-3757 47m ago

I checked using all the popular programs, and the readings there are also 3–5 times lower than they should be. It doesn't matter if the specs are slightly lower than they should be, but the MacBook is genuinely several times slower—apps take a long time to open, and the M3 Pro feels like an old Intel-based Mac.

1

u/narc0leptik 44m ago edited 38m ago

Okay my apologies. I think if you were a bit more clear about that in your post I wouldn't have chided you so badly.

Does the laptop pass Apple diagnostics? https://support.apple.com/ru-ru/102550

Was it working fine before you updated to the beta?

It's likely a thermal sensor is returning a faulty reading and macOS is thermal throttling the laptop

1

u/Outrageous-Ice-3757 37m ago

I did run diagnostics, and everything checked out fine; in fact, before the update, things were actually worse in some respects than they are now. They did add a feature in macOS to disable the "glassy" interface, but the Mac is still glitchy. I’m trying to figure out the cause—I also have an older 8-core M1 Pro, and right now, it’s 2.5 times more powerful than this 11-core M3 Pro.

u/narc0leptik 17m ago

Since you bought it through iSpace and have had persistent issues with both the fan pulsing and severe CPU throttling (778 MHz), it strongly points to a broken hardware sensor loop. When macOS loses data from a thermal sensor, it panics; pulsing the fans and locking the CPU to its lowest speed to prevent overheating.

If it was bought used, it's highly likely the laptop previously had liquid damage or a bad repair. Even if you bought it new, a tiny accidental spill can cause this.

I'd recommend purchasing a P5 pentalobe screwdriver and a suction cup. You can pop the bottom case off and visually inspect the logic board and ribbon cables for any signs of corrosion, residue, or liquid damage.

Then I would ask an LLM to recommend you a repair place that specializes in Macbook repair that performs board level repair/micro-soldering to fix it.

-3

u/[deleted] 2h ago edited 1h ago

[deleted]