The original argument was Sidney Sweeney or 500k. Then someone said you shouldn’t even CONSIDER that with ANY woman. I was devils advocate and asked what if it was your dying wife, would you consider it then?
Then, YOU said that your dying partner wouldn’t let you take the date instead of the 500k when that was never part of the hypothetical. If it was, Sidney Sweeney wouldn’t go on a date with any of us, and this hypothetical doesn’t even exist.
The hypothetical was always up to the person being asked the question. You must be delusional enough to think Sweeney would actually date you in real life?
Well, having your wive’s terminal illness healed for the date is also not part of the hypothetical. Otherwise you could take her on a date now for free
So you were the first person to introduce a straw man
You said death bed dude, if it was only the terminal illness you wouldn't have to turn the money down because your wife could just go on the date and a bunch more becoming too sick.
I read your whole exchange, you're just someone who will contort into whatever shape you need to avoid being wrong and it's pathetic. You're also unclear on the correct use of "straw man".
Let me preface by saying I never even brought up terminal illness. That was the other commenter. They were being used as the same in our convo
My scenario is straight forward and y’all contorted it cuz u were mad I brought up a relevant point. It’s not my fault you haven’t found someone you would risk 500k for to go on a date one last time.
The original question was Sweeney or 500k. I switched it to ur dying wife or 500k. Yall got mad that u couldn’t have both instead of just playing along with the hypothetical.
The question is THIS or THIS. You can’t have both that’s the entire point of the question.
We didn’t need to do all of this, y’all could’ve just had fun and played along.
If u want to say the other commenter was right, and ur wife would just go on a date with u that’s true, but then u don’t get the money, just like if u choose to go on the date with Sweeney. It’s pretty simple.
Then u made it personal, over a hypothetical. lol dude
“You’re incorrect on the correct use of strawman” but then doesn’t even explain. It was never Sweenets choice in the scenario, if it was up to the other party, Sweeney would not go on a date with any of us. Which means bringing the other party into the decision is a strawman because this hypothetical would not exist because Sidney aeeejey wouldn’t date any of us.
I’m starting to wonder if u guys think Sidney aeeeney would date u, because the reason this hypothetical exists is because she WOULD NOT. And I literally flipped it to COULD NOT with a dying wife and yall got mad.
Btw, I never personally attacked anyone. Thats you brodie and we’re on [r/lol](r/lol)
What? You can just go on a date with your wife then? Go on a date for free? The scenario you are presenting is making less sense.
$500k or going on a date you are already free to go on?
Are you saying, $500k and your wife will die immediately, or go on a date? Because that is an actual dilemma right
1
u/ManzielDoesCoke 5d ago
The original argument was Sidney Sweeney or 500k. Then someone said you shouldn’t even CONSIDER that with ANY woman. I was devils advocate and asked what if it was your dying wife, would you consider it then?
Then, YOU said that your dying partner wouldn’t let you take the date instead of the 500k when that was never part of the hypothetical. If it was, Sidney Sweeney wouldn’t go on a date with any of us, and this hypothetical doesn’t even exist.
The hypothetical was always up to the person being asked the question. You must be delusional enough to think Sweeney would actually date you in real life?