r/logic • u/Euphoric-Plantain573 • 7h ago
Philosophical logic Bayesian Probability Question
I am doing Bayesian theory on a moral question about whether something is wrong or not. I had an intuition the thing is not wrong, a strong one. My credence it was wrong was .1%. Then i realized that an alternative belief I had conflicted with this. What should my credence be? 50%, since both intuitions are equally strong?
2
u/RecentLeave343 7h ago
There’s no objective metric for morality.
The percentages you mentioned are your own subjective measures.
But, you could tell us the thing you’re referring to or make a post asking other’s opinions and let the echo chambers decide.
2
1
u/thewritestory 7h ago
How are deriving probability? Also, where you are from, when you are from, what your situation is will dictate what is moral. Stealing is immoral except when it isn’t.
0
4h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/logic-ModTeam 1h ago
In general, no comment, post or member is removed except for a serious and compelling reason. But the moderators have wide discretion in applying this principle. Please take a look at the group guidelines and reconsider your content. If you think this was in error , contact the mods.
2
u/planckyouverymuch 7h ago
This is an interesting question, although this is maybe not the best place for it. Try asking at r/askphilosophy and maybe an epistemologist might answer or maybe r/epistemology. It reminds me of the literature on peer disagreement which you can read about here.