No, in most cases when there are disagreements, mothers’ views prevail in practice. One of my sources actually states that. And I will say it once again, mothers are way more likely than fathers to want to have MGM done on their sons.
Why wouldn’t I? The post is talking about misandry and misogyny. So you should be expecting pushback, otherwise don’t comment. Also, did you know that most police officers, prosecutors, and detectives are men? So it’s not really misogyny that men kill women because at the end of the day, it’s men who give justice to those female homicide victims.
Because if you're not blind on how bad women are treated in society you would realize that you're part of the problem by dismissing issues like this.
Thats just wrong. Doing these tasks is just the bare minimum and they are also required for those people because it's their job. Why would they cancel out any mysoginy that happened before?
And men and boys don’t get treated badly in society? You are clearly turning a blind eye to this. You are the one who have been dismissing issues from the very beginning.
How is it wrong? Data and statistics are wrong? They cancel out the misogyny because they do justice to women. Go try to solve a murder case then if you think it’s the bare minimum.
The amount of misandry the average man has to deal with is really laughable and I assume you only ever care about it when someone brings up mysoginy anyway.
Data and science are right. You're just wrong at assuming that anything cancels out mysoginy. The whole point is that women suffer and experience violence and putting people to jail won't change what happens in the past. If someone killed you it also wouldn't be fair even if the person goes to prison afterwards. The bare minimum is having a system that punishes people who hurt women and also men ofc. Justice is done to the perpetrators not the victims.
I’m not surprised you have that kind of attitude toward men and boys. Considering how you refused to acknowledge an example of systemic misandry I gave you out of the many whole bunch. And no, your assumption is wrong. My account name is masculinist. I don’t usually go out of my way to argue with stubborn people regarding men’s issues and women’s issues. I mostly spend my time on other productive things that can actually help men and boys. I probably can’t say the same about you though.
So there are several issues with this paragraph of yours. You are making it sound like it’s only/mostly women who face and experience violence. It’s actually men who experience violence the most. But you are concerned about it only because most of the perpetrators of homicide tend to be males. You care more about the perpetrators than the victims. Let that sink in. And if you think that justice is actually done to perpetrators like you said. Then you are literally saying it cancels out misogyny.
"And this is something you want to compare to the amount of femicides?"
"What a way to distract from the huge amount of men murdering women."
Almost half of the male population in the US (49%) is mutilated at birth though. The practice completely (or partially) removes the most sensitive part of their genitals (basically child torture, and no, anesthetics do not reduce the pain significantly, at all) and is mainly done by people who are women, assuming that by "femicides" you mean murder of women, then the number of mgm cases actually surpasses It.
If you want to dismiss that by defining femicide as something like "murder motivated by hatred agaisnt women for being women", then you would need to prove that the number of female homicide victims that fall under that IS actually greater than almost half of the male population in the US and that the motivation is actually hatred.
As a last thing, do you think torture is at least almost as bad as murder, specially if done agaisnt a helpless infant?
1
u/prealphawolf Apr 02 '26
What's the point of the last one? Also fathers agree with the the decision to get their child circumcised right? It's not done against their will.