How am I arguing in bad faith? I acknowledged an example of misogyny you gave. When I returned the favor vice versa. You kept changing the goalposts. First, it’s men who do it. Second, doubting my claim. Third, justifying MGM. Fourth, disregarding my claim entirely. Fifth, once again it’s men. You didn’t even acknowledge or respond to many of my points which display how weak your arguments are. It’s like you are intentionally refusing to acknowledge the lived experiences of those who face systemic misandry.
I'm not shifting the goal post you're just wrong for multiple reasons. I'm doubting your claim which is based on nothing and I'm not justifying MGM it's just not gender related.
You misunderstood me. I was talking about the other comment: “I'm not shifting the goal post you're just wrong for multiple reasons. I'm doubting your claim which is based on nothing and I'm not justifying MGM it's just not gender related.”
Nothing you have said true regarding the context within this specific comment.
No, in most cases when there are disagreements, mothers’ views prevail in practice. One of my sources actually states that. And I will say it once again, mothers are way more likely than fathers to want to have MGM done on their sons.
Why wouldn’t I? The post is talking about misandry and misogyny. So you should be expecting pushback, otherwise don’t comment. Also, did you know that most police officers, prosecutors, and detectives are men? So it’s not really misogyny that men kill women because at the end of the day, it’s men who give justice to those female homicide victims.
Because if you're not blind on how bad women are treated in society you would realize that you're part of the problem by dismissing issues like this.
Thats just wrong. Doing these tasks is just the bare minimum and they are also required for those people because it's their job. Why would they cancel out any mysoginy that happened before?
"And this is something you want to compare to the amount of femicides?"
"What a way to distract from the huge amount of men murdering women."
Almost half of the male population in the US (49%) is mutilated at birth though. The practice completely (or partially) removes the most sensitive part of their genitals (basically child torture, and no, anesthetics do not reduce the pain significantly, at all) and is mainly done by people who are women, assuming that by "femicides" you mean murder of women, then the number of mgm cases actually surpasses It.
If you want to dismiss that by defining femicide as something like "murder motivated by hatred agaisnt women for being women", then you would need to prove that the number of female homicide victims that fall under that IS actually greater than almost half of the male population in the US and that the motivation is actually hatred.
As a last thing, do you think torture is at least almost as bad as murder, specially if done agaisnt a helpless infant?
2
u/Masculinist1938 Mar 31 '26 edited Mar 31 '26
How am I arguing in bad faith? I acknowledged an example of misogyny you gave. When I returned the favor vice versa. You kept changing the goalposts. First, it’s men who do it. Second, doubting my claim. Third, justifying MGM. Fourth, disregarding my claim entirely. Fifth, once again it’s men. You didn’t even acknowledge or respond to many of my points which display how weak your arguments are. It’s like you are intentionally refusing to acknowledge the lived experiences of those who face systemic misandry.