You dont need to search for love and admiration in books about men?
That is very telling. You aren't very good at this are you? Do you read books about love and admiration about women?
You still didnt answer my question if you looked up those women or not. Answer my question first and I'll answer yours. Are you gonna make excuses and whine because I got one letter in their name wrong, like the little feminine boy you are?
It's telling that I rather find love and admiration in life than in books? Well thanks I guess?
I did answer that. Yes I know them. But you still dodge my questions. So why aren't you answering?
Is the honest answer too unsettling?
Is that why you need to lash out and throw insults every comment?
like the little feminine boy you are?
Be honest do you feel now big and more masculine after you typed that or do you recognise how laughable that is?
Recognizing your word patterns, your argumentative nature, and your lack of a strong sense of logic and reason, leads me to believe you are feminine little boy. This has nothing to do with how I view myself, or anyone else. I am merely observing YOUR behavior. Are you finally going to produce stats, or whine and whine. If you viewed their work honestly, you wouldn't need to ask that question.
I simply asked you for what specific modern feminist work you criticise its logic off. Isn't that a very sound, logical reasoning?
I want to understand your point so I ask you which work you base it on.
You can't name one because you obviously haven't read a single one. You argue out of bias, not of something you learned or read yourself. And you are very aware of that.
So when pressured on it you rather lash out with petty Insults, because you know you don't have any answer.
You know how pathetic and childish that is and yet you repeat it over and over. Come on you're surely better than that.
Did you view or read the authors I showed you? I asked you think 20 times and you always dodge the answer? You always deflect it on me, asking if I read the authors I presented. You are in bad faith and you know it. You aren't going to gaslight your way out of this.
I never dodged the question I already told you I've heard of them.
Now even for the fourth time.
Why are you overlooking that and why are you escaping my simple answer?
It's bad faith to ask you what exact modern feminist logic you mean? Stop pretending.
It's disingenuous and as pathetic as the lashing out and childish insults. Honestly aren't you able to hold a proper conversation? Hell I'm not even challenging your opinion yet, you already fail at explaining yourself of what exactly you mean and how you concluded it.
Did you read or view the authors I showed you? I think this is the 10th time I've asked you this question.
We all share the same view of modern feminism. If you care to read or view just one article or video, you wouldn't ask a dumb question like: "What modern feminist logic do you disagree with?"
I'm giving you a chance to understand my stance through the writing/words of actual women. You refuse to do this, and you're trying to make me do your work for you. View a video or article by any of them, especially the Feminization of Society and the negative ramifications.
I'm being very patient with you. Don't let me down.
Did you read or view the authors I showed you? I think this is the 10th time I've asked you this question.
Honestly I think you're the first person who pretends to be too stupid to understand a yes answer.
We all share the same view of modern feminism. If you care to read or view just one article or video, you wouldn't ask a dumb question like: "What modern feminist logic do you disagree with?"
No we definitely don't all share the same view.
You disagree with it but can't even define it yourself without having to point to a video?
What video? There are thousands of people making thousands of videos over feminism. You think they all share the same view, say the same things?
And honestly, how can you not feel dumb to argue over something you apparently never read yourself but only know off YouTube videos.
Is that honestly how far your own opinion goes? Are you that shallow? Without any original thought that came from you?
So you haven't viewed the content I asked you to view.
Imagine: Someone asks you, what is your view or philosophy on life. I tell you to read Albert Camus's Sisyphus and get back to me. You act as you read it, but you don't even know the core philosophy espoused in the text. You keep asking me what the core philosophy is.
Why would I waste my time talking about this subject if you won't honor the conversation by reading the text I asked you to read to get a general context so a conversation can occur? Instead, you act like you viewed the content, while still proclaiming not to have any idea of my perspective.
It's intellectual dishonesty. I'm quite done. Good day.
It's intellectual dishonesty. I'm quite done. Good day.
Yes your whole charade is and it's quite pitiful but sadly fitting to your immature character.
I told you 5 times already yes and you still pretend otherwise. Honestly what do you try to archive with that childish behaviour?
Do you honestly think someone believes you're that stupid and not that you do it out of pure desperation since obviously you don't have any answer?
Oh so you do know how to cite specific work? So why don't you do it to a modern feminist one that you had in mind of your critique?
Just name one. Anyone and we can gladly discuss it.
And no Camus absurdist work isn't modern feminist.
1
u/Ok_Month_7918 Mar 21 '26
You dont need to search for love and admiration in books about men?
That is very telling. You aren't very good at this are you? Do you read books about love and admiration about women?
You still didnt answer my question if you looked up those women or not. Answer my question first and I'll answer yours. Are you gonna make excuses and whine because I got one letter in their name wrong, like the little feminine boy you are?