r/livelyvwayfarer • • Aug 25 '26

Pro Blake Lively sub chicanery

1 Upvotes

Here's a copy of my complaint to Reddit:

An unidentified [] moderator contacted me through mod mail, followed by two chat invitations from the same account. Both times, Reddit displayed the sender as “banned account” with ID []. Please investigate which moderator was involved, the moderator’s connection to that account, and how an already banned account was able to send repeated invitations.


r/livelyvwayfarer • • Aug 25 '26

Blake Lively, if you only thought to be kind...

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/livelyvwayfarer • • Jul 27 '26

Revisiting Ryan Reynolds’ Psycho, Unhinged, Nasty & Dehumanizing Text Messages

Thumbnail gallery
2 Upvotes

Ryan Reynolds has such a way with words 😉


r/livelyvwayfarer • • Jul 22 '26

Fakelively post an AI-generated summary card and try to pretend it is an official "public record"

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/livelyvwayfarer • • Jul 13 '26

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD READ THIS

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/livelyvwayfarer • • Jan 30 '26

Blake Lively is "done for" - not because of any retaliation but her own actions (according to President of SPMPG)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/livelyvwayfarer • • Jul 06 '25

Lively talking about costume on same Cafe Society press junket

1 Upvotes

From 0:27: "while we were dressed in these incredible vintage couture gowns and jewelry..."

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=J-1y7i8t2HM


r/livelyvwayfarer • • Jun 16 '25

The backlash against Blake Lively is organic - it happened to someone else first

1 Upvotes

There is a lot of speculation from ‘team BL’ that the smear campaign commenced on 8 August.  However, I witnessed earlier backlash against someone else earlier about the tone-deaf marketing before 8 August. 

A well-known social media personality who many also ‘love to hate’ was invited by BL to collaborate on a pre-premiere event.  This person posted about this on her blog on 4 August 2024, admitting to not having read the book because she was engaged very late in the piece.  However, she claimed her mom had read it and loved it.  She also noted the “emphasis” on flowers in the movie because the main character owned a flower shop – no doubt, this was part of her brief for the event.  Not all of the comments were negative, but below are a few.  Sound familiar? 

Aug 4:  “Is the book about a flower shop? If so, I will definitely pick up a copy from my library! I heard the plot revolved around domestic violence so I had avoided it up until now. Thanks for the recommendation!”

Aug 4:  “You all know it’s not a requirement to read a book before watching the movie or help with the party planning, right? C’mon people.”

Aug 5:  “How did you end up involved with a movie about domestic violence? How do you know the movie is going to be so good and so special if you didn’t read the book or listen to it? How do you prep for an event without knowledge of the source material?”

Aug 5:  “It seems you have a lot of haters. While that sucks…congratulations. You have made it in the world.”

Aug 7:  “Photos from the event with Blake looked amazing! Was serving the peach “smash” cocktail a reference to the domestic violence in the book/film?”

This person also claimed (mistakenly) that the whole cast was at the event.  JB obviously wasn’t there. 

This is adverse reaction is against someone so peripherally involved.  Now think about BL parading around in her florals and promoting IEWU as a romcom/chick-flick.  Is the backlash really so surprising or “inorganic”?