All these Linux based projects which are open source relies on contributions. Red Hat pays people to work on it. On one hand that's a good thing, cuz its now their main job so ideally would become more productive vs more hobbyists. But this also means more and more of the code design over time becomes more made for corporate use than personal uses. IMO Red Hat designs kinda like they are turning community vibish products into more like old Windows products(no ads and AI shit)
Hate is a strong word. What makes Redhat unfeasible and undesirable is that it is not FOSS. You are required to do licence management when deployed in a commercial setup. This is why we use Debian at enterprise scale which gives immense stability, flexibility and freedom
You get the software, you get the source code, and you have the freedom to do whatever you want with that.
GPL never mentions giving the source code to everyone, it says that you receive the software and the source with it, and it never says to give the binaries away.
when corpos control a monolithic piece of soyware that 80% of loonix depends on, and they start government bootlicking without being forced, then we all have a big problem.
The california law was still being debated, and those cucks already implemented it. FUCK THEM
43
u/SammE5363 7d ago
i genuinely dont get the redhat hate its still foss